Channel
@eng_hala95
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,207subscribers
+294 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001668849917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eng_hala95 |
| Description | كُلَّ كَلِمَةٌ كُتِبَت هُنْا راعيتُ فيها قَوِلهِ تَعالى: "ما يَلْفِظُ مِنْ قَوْلٍ إِلَّا لَدَيْهِ رَقِيبٌ عَتِيدٌ" 🌻. |
| Created | 22 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eng_hala95 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
20,600 average views per post against 39,207 subscribers — an engagement rate of 52.6%. Across the 2,109 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,631–99,876 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.57% and 10.9%, with a median of 4.98%.
| Window | 30 days (23 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 15 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 309,320 |
| Mature posts only | 52.6% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 39,207 measured 17 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:ara · 2,109 channels · p10 0.41% · p25 1.57% · p50 4.98% · p75 10.9% · p90 20.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.478th percentile · 10.6× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.035% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 86.7% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 39,207 | +62 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 39,145 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 39,156 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 39,155 | +48 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 39,107 | +6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 39,101 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 39,093 | +28 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 39,065 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 39,082 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 39,088 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 39,089 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 39,096 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 39,100 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 39,109 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 39,105 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 39,112 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 39,116 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 39,126 | +18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 39,108 | +14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 39,094 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (28 July 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 309,320 |
| Reactions total | 26,059 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 23:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62,358 reactions across 46 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 62,358 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62,358 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
يُحيي الإنسان المحبُّ للسيدة الزهراء، الليالي الفاطميّةَ بلهفةٍ قلَّ نظيرُها؛ لأنّه لم ينكبَّ على قبرٍ لها فيبكيه، ولا شباكًا يقبضُ عليه بقوةٍ فيهدأ، ولهذا يموجُ الإنسان بحزنِه هائمًا ضائعًا؛ فقد قُدِّر لهذا الحزنِ الكبير ثلاثُ ليالٍ يواسي فيها مولاتَه -فوق ضلعِها المكسور- بأنّه لا قبرَ لها معلومٌ ولا ضريح. -هالة الجبوري
❤1,290
وصلتني رسائل عديدة من الأخوات، يسألن فيها عن هذا المشروع: كيف نبدأ؟ ما الأدوات؟ وكيف نجعله مشروعًا ناجحًا؟ وهنا سأُبيّن الخلل الذي يقع فيه الشباب والبنات فيما يخصّ مثل هذه المسائل، أمّا باقي التفاصيل يستطيع الشخص أن يستنتجها من خلال الفكرة المُختَصَرة. البعض عندما يريد أن يرفع مستوى علاقته بإمام الزمان "عجّل الله فرجه" يحصر هذه العلاقة فقط في اطّلاعه على الكتب التي تخصّ الإمام، ويعتقد أن المعلومات في هذه الكتب -التي…
❤779
أرجوك، لا تتعامل بالعاطفةِ مع انتظارِ صاحبِ الزمان، بل تعامل معهُ كمشروعٍ،كيف ينجحُ هذا المشروع؟ ألا يحتاجُ إلى السعيِ المستمرّ؟ ألا يحتاجُ إلى بذلِ جُهدٍ جبّار؟ لماذا تقولُ "أحبُّ صاحبَ زماني" لكنّني لا أرى في يديكَ لهُ وردةً؟ أينَ هو البستانُ الذي زرعتَهُ لأجلِهِ؟ ماذا زرعتَ في زمنِ الغيبةِ حتى تحصدَهُ في الظهور؟. -هالة الجبوري
❤1,510
"بنفسي أنتَ أمنيةُ شائقٍ يتمنّى" ليست موجّهةً للخطيب، ولا للزوج، ولا للصديق، ولا للصديقة، بل موجّهةٌ إلى الإمام الغائب صاحب الزمان، فإنّ رؤيته هي الأمنية. نرجو من المصوّرين، والمتزوّجين، والمخطوبين، ومصمّمي بطاقات الدعوات وبوكيهات الورد، الابتعاد عن إيراد مثل هذه العبارات على صورهم ومحتوياتهم. الأدعية ليست اقتباساتٍ من رواية حتى توضع على جلسات تصوير الأعراس، وحفلات التخرّج، والخطوبة؛ للأدعية خصوصيّتها وقدسيّتها، م…
❤1,960
ثلاثون ثانية من الحياء! اتذكّر.. قبل عدّة أيّام كنت اتفرّج علىٰ التلفاز، وتحديدًا إحدىٰ القنوات الّتي تنقل الأجواء داخل حرم وضريح الإمام الحسين (عليه السّلام)، ظهرت لقطة -من بين عدد كبير من الزائرين- لإمرأة علىٰ الكرسي المتحرّك يدفعه ابنها الشاب أو أحد حَفَدَتها؛ لا أعلم، وكما هو معروف أنّ الزيارة لِكبار السنّ من النّساء ومن هنّ علىٰ الكرسي المتحرّك يحق لهنّ الزيارة من جهة الرجال حين يكون المرافق لها رجُل.. عندما د…
❤1,650
من علامات السّلام النفسي للإنسان، أن يلتمس الأعذار للآخرين؛ فلا يُهاجم قبل أن يفهم، ولا يتّخذ موقفًا قبل أن يسمع. لا يُدقّق في ثنايا الردود، ولا يتصيّد الهفوات من أحد، واضحٌ لا يستسيغ المراوغة، ولا يملك وقتًا للجدال. إنسانٌ يعرف قيمة نفسه بما يكفي ليبتعد عن كلّ الصغائر التي لا تليق بنضج عقله. -هالة الجبوري
❤1,550
التوفيق كلُّ التوفيق لمن يُنهي ليلتَهُ بكُميلٍ، ويبدأ فجرَهُ بالعهدِ، ويُكمل صباحَهُ بالنُّدبة. -هالة الجبوري
❤1,890
إنها لَنِعمةٌ ألّا تكون للإنسان رغبةٌ في تطبيق كلّ ترند، بحيث لا يخرج بسببه عن سياق خصوصيّته. خصوصًا المرأة التي لا ترضى أن تضع صورةً لها من دون حجابها، حتى ولو على سبيل صورةٍ غير حقيقية مصنوعة ببرامج الذكاء الاصطناعي. تجد في هذا التصرف ما لا يتناسب مع خصوصيّتها ومحافظتها على حدودها في العفاف والحياء؛ فلا تنشر مثل هذه التفاصيل على العامة، ولا تفرّق معها إن كانت الصورة كرتونيّة أو مُعدَّلة بأيّ طريقة، لأنها لا تريد …
❤1,600
أحيانًا يريد الإنسان أن يقول شيئًا، ولكنّه إلىٰ آخرِ لحظةٍ يودّ أن يجد من ينوب عنه في قول ما يريد، يتمنّى أن يجد مَنَ يأخذ علىٰ عاتقه عبء الشرح؛ لذا تلمع عينا المرء حين يجد من يفهمه. -هالة الجبوري
❤1,590
بعد ترويج فكرة الإستحقاق، يعتقد هذا الشخص أن الاستحقاق لا يتنافى مع كرامة الإنسان المعطي. وأنّ النِّساء ما رح تشوفه بنظرة دونية أو استصغار أو بلا كرامة، طالما هنّ صارن مؤمنات بنظريّة الاستحقاق العالي ورفع الأيغو والأنا، وهذا التشويه للمفاهيم.. ترويج لفكرة استحقاق الأنثى بشكل مُبطّن وعلى حساب هدر الكرامة تصرّف أحمق، لأن النساء السويات بطبيعتهن يرفضن اهانة الرجل لنفسه حتى لو كان هذا التصرف علمودهن، تلقائياً المرأة ا…
❤1,060
الله سبحانه وتعالى بعث الأنبياء حتى يوجهون الناس لعبادة الله الواحد الأحد، هذه العبادة تحفظ كرامة الإنسان من الركوع گدام صنم مصنوع من طين أو حجر أو تمر، أو السجود گدام حيوان أو تمثال. جزء من معنى عبادة الله تعالى هي صون كرامة الإنسان والارتقاء بمستوى عقله عن الخضوع للأصنام والأوثان. القرآن الكريم مواضيعه تدور عن الكرامة.. لا تكذب حتى تحافظ على كرامتك. كُن من المتّقين حتّى تحافظ على كرامتك. تصدّق بطريقة تحافظ بيها عل…
❤830
خدمةً لمحمّد وآل محمّد، وتقديرًا لروح الوالد "رحمه الله تعالى"، لن أنقطع -إن شاء الله تعالى- عن كتابة المواضيع والنصوص، وكلّ كلمةٍ أرجو أن تعود بالنفع والفائدة على الآخرين؛ لتبقى الكتابة بابًا من أبواب الخير، وصدقةً جاريةً في معناها وأثرها. شكرًا لكم من القلب على ما جدتم به من أحرّ التعازي وأصدق المواساة، فقد كنتم نعمَ المواسين والمعزّين. رحم الله أمواتكم جميعًا، وحفظ لكم أحباءكم، وأطال الله في أعماركم وأعمارهم بال…
❤2,210
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @eng_hala95. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 65 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هالة الجبوري” (@eng_hala95), 39,207 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eng_hala95.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.