Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net -404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,423–61,124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 13:46
60,605
+98
7 Nov 2026, 07:11
60,507
-3
6 Nov 2026, 05:35
60,510
+6
5 Nov 2026, 01:06
60,504
-4
4 Nov 2026, 04:10
60,508
-13
3 Nov 2026, 01:44
60,521
-15
2 Nov 2026, 03:41
60,536
-20
1 Nov 2026, 03:04
60,556
-19
31 Oct 2026, 01:26
60,575
+1
30 Oct 2026, 01:41
60,574
-15
29 Oct 2026, 01:40
60,589
-16
28 Oct 2026, 00:40
60,605
-19
27 Oct 2026, 00:16
60,624
-17
26 Oct 2026, 03:16
60,641
-23
25 Oct 2026, 05:00
60,664
-15
24 Oct 2026, 01:28
60,679
-29
23 Oct 2026, 01:18
60,708
-10
21 Oct 2026, 22:31
60,718
-7
20 Oct 2026, 19:57
60,725
+16
19 Oct 2026, 16:21
60,709
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 60,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,200
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.368%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
67 (8 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
213,420
Reactions total
785
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
43m 47s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,912 reactions across 67 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,413
87.2%
👍
171
4.37%
🙏
165
4.22%
🥰
59
1.51%
🔥
37
0.946%
👏
15
0.383%
😇
7
0.179%
👎
5
0.128%
💯
5
0.128%
😁
4
0.102%
🎉
3
0.077%
🏆
3
0.077%
🕊
3
0.077%
🍌
2
0.051%
😍
2
0.051%
😐
2
0.051%
🤩
2
0.051%
🤷♀
2
0.051%
🌭
1
0.026%
🎄
1
0.026%
10 further kinds
10
0.256%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,912 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
„Meiner Frau nicht helfen zu können, war schwierig.“
Dr. med. Mathias Künlen ist Neurologe. Die Diagnose bei seiner Frau Christine war eindeutig. Doch therapeutisch konnte sein eigenes Fachgebiet nichts mehr für sie tun.
Wenn du Mathias live erleben möchtest:
📅 Di. 10. & Mi. 11. November, 19 bis 21 Uhr
🎁 Kostenloses Online-Live-Event „Heilung ist (k)ein Wunder“
👉 Jetzt kostenlos anmelden
⏰ Tick Tack... Die Zeit läuft! ⏰
Der Find Your Flow Livestream steht kurz bevor und die letzten Plätze werden knapp! Sichere dir noch schnell dein kostenloses Ticket und sei am 7. und 8. November dabei, wenn es heißt:
🌊 Eintauchen in den Flow und dein Leben neu gestalten! 🌊
Lass dir diese einmalige Gelegenheit nicht entgehen. Unsere Top-Speaker geben ihr Bestes, um dich zu inspirieren und dir wertvolle Tools an di…
„Gib nicht auf. Aber geh einen anderen Weg.“ 🙏
Diese Worte von Dr. med. Mathias Künlen sind für alle, die schon so vieles ausprobiert haben.
Erlebe Dr. med. Mathias Künlen live! Und lass dich in die Welt der Aurachirurgie entführen.
📅 Di. 10. & Mi. 11. November, 19 bis 21 Uhr
🎁 Kostenloses Online-Live-Event „Heilung ist (k)ein Wunder“
👉 Jetzt dabei sein!
OPERIEREN. OHNE SCHNITT.
Ohne den Körper zu berühren. In der Aura. Klingt verrückt? 🤯
Das dachte sich auch Dr. med. Mathias Künlen.
Über 30 Jahre Medizin. Facharzt für Neurologie. Ein Mann, der an Messbares glaubt. Nicht an Wunder.
Und heute arbeitet er ausschließlich mit Aurachirurgie.
Was, wenn hinter manchen Beschwerden, Ängsten oder wiederkehrenden Lebensmustern mehr steckt, als wir bisher vermutet haben? 🔎 Find…
🌊 Lass dich vom Flow finden! 🌊
Der legendäre Find Your Flow Livestream geht in die nächste Runde – dieses Mal mit spannenden neuen Inhalten und noch mehr Tiefgang. 🙌
🗓️ Sei am 7. & 8. November live dabei, wenn unsere Top-Speaker ihr Wissen mit dir teilen:
✨ Wege zu innerem Frieden
✨ Entfalte dein volles Potential
✨ Die Kraft der Achtsamkeit
✨ Bringe mehr Leichtigkeit in dein Leben
✨ Finde Klarheit für deinen Weg
…
Wir sind heute mit Tag 1 des 5-tägigen Online-Trainings «Das Alphabet deines Körpers» mit Dr. Ruediger Dahlke gestartet & wir sind überwältigt von dieser unglaublich schönen Resonanz.
Uns erreichen so viele Kommentare & Nachrichten und es freut uns sehr, dass euch das Training so gefällt.
Du kannst dir jetzt noch das Video von Tag 1 anschauen. Morgen folgt dann bereits das neue Video von Tag 2.
Klicke hier, um Tag…
📅 Fünf Tage, fünf Themen, ein Live-Abend.
Nur 20 Minuten am Tag, und du lernst Schritt für Schritt, die Sprache deines Körpers zu lesen. 🌱
So läuft’s:
☀️ Jeden Morgen ab 6 Uhr kommt dein Video per E-Mail
⏱️ Jedes Video bleibt 48 Stunden für dich online
🎙 Am 30. Oktober um 19.15 Uhr erlebst du Dr. Ruediger Dahlke live
👉 Jetzt kostenlos anmelden:
https://www.gesundheit.consulting/plc-dasalphabetdeineskoerpers/optin/…
🎥 Eine persönliche Einladung von Dr. Ruediger Dahlke
Fast 50 Jahre Erfahrung als Arzt. Fünf Tage, in denen er dir einen Eindruck von den grossen Themen seiner Medizin gibt. Und von der Frage, was dir dein Körper eigentlich sagen will. 💭
✨ Das Alphabet deines Körpers
Kostenloses 5-Tage-Online-Training
📅 26. bis 30. Oktober, täglich ab 6 Uhr ein Video
🎙 Live-Abend am 30. Oktober um 19.15 Uhr
👉 Jetzt kostenlos anmeld…
🧩 Hast du alle fünf gewusst?
Unsere Sprache weiss längst, was wir oft übersehen: Körper und Seele stehen im Dialog. Und du sprichst diese Sprache schon, ohne es zu merken.
✨ Im kostenlosen 5-Tage-Online-Training „Das Alphabet deines Körpers“ zeigt dir Dr. Ruediger Dahlke, wie du die Rufe deiner Seele besser verstehen lernst.
📅 26. bis 30. Oktober, täglich ab 6 Uhr ein Video
🎙 Live-Abend am 30. Oktober um 19.15 Uhr…
🎬 Vom Tiefpunkt zu einem selbstbestimmten Leben
Vor ein paar Jahren war Marco an einem Tiefpunkt: unzufrieden im Job, ständig erschöpft, ungesunde Gewohnheiten.
Dann hörte er Dr. Ruediger Dahlke über Ernährung und Krankheitsbilder sprechen und spürte sofort: Das resoniert.
Schritt für Schritt stellte er seine Ernährung um, entdeckte das Fasten für sich und ging seine eigenen Themen an.
Sein grösster Aha-Moment? E…
Heute Abend geht’s los! 🔥
Um 19:00 Uhr startet HEILEN, das brandneue Online-Live-Event mit Steffen Lohrer und Matthias Vette.
Drei Abende, drei Schritte:
🔍 Tag 1 (heute): Erkennen
Wir starten mit der körperlichen und der mentalen Ebene.
💧 Tag 2: Auflösen
Hier geht es um die emotionale Ebene.
✨ Tag 3: Ganzheitlich heilen
Zum Abschluss die energetische Ebene, und wie alle vier zusammenwirken.
💡 Unser Tipp für heu…
✨ Das Alphabet deines Körpers ✨
Kostenloses 5-Tage-Online-Training mit Dr. Ruediger Dahlke.
Dein Symptom kommt immer wieder. Immer an derselben Stelle. Und niemand kann dir sagen, warum?
Vom 26. bis 30. Oktober nehmen wir dich mit auf eine Reise zur Sprache deines Körpers.
Dr. Ruediger Dahlke zeigt dir Schritt für Schritt, was hinter deinen Symptomen stecken kann. Wie bei einem neuen Alphabet: Buchstabe für Buchs…
❤43👍8🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @younity_mee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Christian Bischoff @christian_bischoff_mindset · 28,428 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 September 2026
Gaia deutsch @Gaiadeutsch · 38,197 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
THEKI Academy @theki_offiziell · 21,239 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
🇨🇭QS24 | Schweizer Gesundheitsfernsehen - Eine Perspektive mehr Gesundheit & Persönlichkeitsentwicklung. @QS24_tv · 27,079 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
️ Silke Schaefer Astrologie Offiziell @silkeschaefer · 120,187 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Birgit Fischer official @mediumbirgitfischer · 80,965 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Pavlina Klemm Lichtbotschaften von den Plejaden @pavlinaklemmlichtbotschaften · 26,746 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
Dr. Michael Spitzbart @drspitzbart · 67,925 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
Raik Garve @Gesundheitslehrer · 40,911 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“younity.com” (@younity_mee), 60,605 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/younity_mee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.