Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 조일현

Channel

조일현

@CryptoFamily_ilhyun

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,545subscribers

-326 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001224626870
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoFamily_ilhyun
Created2 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoFamily_ilhyun

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,54514,87114,7086 August 2026 — 14,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,870 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,867 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,856 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,855 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,856 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,850 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,834 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,835 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,837 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,820 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,810 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,807 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,796 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,790 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,782 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,767 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,756 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,743 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,741 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,735 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,722 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,709 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,703 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,696 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,690 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,670 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,634 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,612 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,592 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,578 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,554 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,545 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -326. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,496–14,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:5714,545-9
16 Sept 2026, 15:2014,554-24
14 Sept 2026, 20:3914,578-14
13 Sept 2026, 04:1714,592-20
11 Sept 2026, 09:3714,612-22
8 Sept 2026, 16:0114,634-36
5 Sept 2026, 10:3914,670-20
3 Sept 2026, 13:2114,690-6
2 Sept 2026, 08:4614,696-7
1 Sept 2026, 06:3614,703-6
31 Aug 2026, 08:0814,709-13
30 Aug 2026, 11:0714,722-13
29 Aug 2026, 09:0514,735-6
28 Aug 2026, 06:3414,741-2
27 Aug 2026, 03:4214,743-8
26 Aug 2026, 02:4314,751-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:1314,756-11
24 Aug 2026, 02:4414,767-15
22 Aug 2026, 10:5514,782-8
20 Aug 2026, 21:3514,790first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

673 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
51476.4%
👍13019.3%
👏162.38%
🖕60.892%
🔥40.594%
🥰20.297%
🤣10.149%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 693 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC≈3,260 views109 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

대한독립만세🇰🇷

👍8722

Signed 일현이

6 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈3,350 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @yeouidobi

정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다 @netdebtzer0 로 연

10🖕3

Signed 일현이

31 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC≈4,190 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @cryptomouseview

주식용 부캐를 만들어 투자에 대한 아이디어 기록과 복기를 위해 블로그를 시작했습니다 얼마나 열심히 할지는 모르겠습니다 그래도 할까 말까 하면 하고 후회하는 스타일이라 일단 합니다 주식 ㅈ밥의 성장을 위한 기록입니다. 재밌게 봐주세요 * 크마뷰 채널은 항상 쥐듣노와 똥글을 지향합니다. https://blog.naver.com/leverage_moment/224364041273

3🖕3🥰2

Signed 일현이

30 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC≈4,510 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @ilhyunNotesonLife

왜냐면 이 시장을 경험할수록 특정 종목이나 특정 자산군들에 대한 믿음이 얼마나 무참히 박살나는지 보게 된다. 반대로 특정 종목이나 자산군을 믿고 큰 부를 얻게 된 사람도 있다. 그런데 이런 구조가 오래 가냐는 말이다. 다들 내가 하이퍼리퀴드를 알아보고 초기부터 참여해서 안목이 있다는 느낌으로 알고 있는데 전혀 사실이 아니다. 첨부터 하이퍼리퀴드가 잘 될지 안 될지 어떻게 아노 그냥 나는 5년간 계속 반복하다가 어쩌다 하나 터진게 하이퍼리퀴드 였을뿐. 물론 하이퍼리퀴드에 좀 더 공을 들인건 사실이다. 하지만 그것은 비중의 문제 였을뿐. 나는 그때도 다른 프로젝트를 여전히 하고 있었다. 무너지지 않는 구조를 만들자. 나에겐 하나에만 몰두 하는게 아닌 여러 프로젝트에 씨를 뿌려두는게 무너지지 않는 형태였다. 그리고 더 나아가 현금 주식

41👍14

Signed 일현이

30 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈3,130 views38 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @justdegenguy

반도체 하따를 잡으려는 나에 관해서 생각해봤음. 국장 매매는 7월 15일 반등을 마지막으로 무포지션. 160만원대에 사서 평균 매도가는 235만원 정도였고, 그 이후로는 아무것도 들고 있지 않았음. 근데 시장의 가장 큰 관심이 여전히 반도체에 쏠려있다 보니까 나도 계속 보게 됨. 최근 하락을 보고 심장이 쿵쾅대서 어제 125만원에 나도 모르게 매수버튼을 좀 큰 사이즈로 눌렀음. 그러고 금방 정리함. 포지션을 열고 정리하기까지 잠깐 생각해봤는데, 내가 왜 지금 반도체를 당연히 매매해야하는 종목으로 생각하고 있지? 기존에 진입했던 논리는 지금 대부분 사라졌음. 외국 리테일의 진입, 수급의 확장, 그리고 반도체 내러티브가 사람들을 어디까지 설득할 수 있을지에 대한 기대가 있었음. 근데 탑에서는 사실 나도 정신을 차리기가 힘들었음. 전세계

35👍3

Signed 일현이

30 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC≈3,230 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @eastsouthwind

https://m.blog.naver.com/pillion21/222344581658

9

Signed 일현이

7 Jul 2026, 05:52 UTC≈5,610 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @vinil_11

https://m.blog.naver.com/pillion21/224332954637

21🔥4

Signed 일현이

30 Jun 2026, 07:41 UTC≈7,100 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @ilhyunNotesonLife

투자 채널에 제 생각과 기록을 너무 많이 올리는 것 같아, 앞으로는 이런 내용은 이곳에만 기록하려고 합니다.

18

Signed 코생코사

30 Jun 2026, 07:19 UTC≈6,580 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

혼돈의 시대, 나는 어떤 사람이 될 것인가 혼란의 시대다. 기술은 빠르게 발전하지만 그것을 다루는 지혜는 항상 같은 속도로 따라오지 않는다. 정보는 넘쳐나지만 진실을 가려내기는 점점 어려워진다. 자유는 커졌지만 책임은 회피되는 경우가 많고, 권리는 강하게 주장하면서도 의무는 소홀히 여기는 모습도 적지 않다. 질서는 약해지고, 공동체보다 개인의 이익이 우선되는 일이 늘어난다. 로버트 무어는 성숙한 남성성을 네 가지 원형으로 설명한다. 왕(King)은 질서와 책임을 세우고, 혼란 속에서도 방향을 제시하며 공동체에 안정감을 주는 존재다. 전사(Warrior)는 규율과 용기, 실행력으로 목표를 향해 나아가며, 감정에 휘둘리지 않고 해야 할 일을 해내는 존재다. 마법사(Magician)는 지식과 통찰, 분석과 객관성을 바탕으로 세상의 본질을

33👍2

Signed 일현이

24 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC≈5,960 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026

배우/아이돌만 은밀하게하는 외모관리 (따라하면 무조건 잘생겨짐) 후.. 나중에 꼭 해야지 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOCHANRUIao

👏16👍2

Signed 일현이

24 Jun 2026, 02:30 UTC≈9,230 views65 reactionsread 2 September 2026

"매달 월급 모아서 S&P500 사세요" 예전부터 이 말이 이상하게 거슬렸다. 왜 이런 감정이 들었는지 한번 생각해봤다. 일단 좆같은 점 1. 좋은 걸 찾았는데 왜 굳이 별로인 것까지 같이 사지? 2. 내가 스스로 생각하고 판단하고 공부하고 분석할 수 있는데 왜 생각을 멈추고 시장 평균을 사야 하지? 3. 시장을 이길 수 없다고 단정하는 태도 자체가 마음에 들지 않는다. 사고의 가능성을 닫아버리는 느낌이랄까 4. 산업이 어떻게 변하는지, 기술이 어디로 가는지, 사람들이 무엇을 원하게 되는지 고민하는 것. 그런데 인덱스 투자는 그런 과정이 없다. 그냥 정해진 규칙대로 계속 사는 느낌이다. 나에게 투자란 공부, 분석, 통찰, 투자 논리의 검증과 수정을 반복하며 세상을 이해해 가는 과정이다. 여기서 돈은 가장 효과적인 현실과 연결되는 검증

64🤣1

Signed 일현이

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CryptoFamily_ilhyun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,798
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 37,467
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“조일현” (@CryptoFamily_ilhyun), 14,545 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFamily_ilhyun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.