The crypto market added $14B in less than 24 hours.📈

Channel
Crypto TV India (Crypto Asad)
@CryptoTvIndia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,376subscribers
-1,222 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001131328128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoTvIndia |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoTvIndia |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 30,376 | -167 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 30,543 | -53 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 30,596 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:45 | 30,621 | -52 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:44 | 30,673 | -29 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 30,702 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 30,737 | -37 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 30,774 | -30 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 30,804 | -40 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 30,844 | -31 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 30,875 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 30,904 | -44 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 30,948 | -76 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 31,024 | -52 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 31,076 | -29 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 31,105 | -27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 31,132 | -29 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 31,161 | -46 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 31,207 | -49 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 31,256 | first reading |
Engagement
303 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.43%
- avg views ÷ 30,376 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 433
- 243 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.12%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 248
- of 303 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 177 of 243 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 303 (5 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 105,220 |
| Reactions total | 857 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 23:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 57s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,001 reactions across 204 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 346 | 34.6% | |
| 👏 | 103 | 10.3% | |
| 😍 | 93 | 9.29% | |
| 🔥 | 81 | 8.09% | |
| 👍 | 72 | 7.19% | |
| 🤗 | 69 | 6.89% | |
| 💯 | 52 | 5.19% | |
| 🥰 | 48 | 4.80% | |
| 👌 | 43 | 4.30% | |
| 😭 | 42 | 4.20% | |
| 🏆 | 29 | 2.90% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 1.70% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 303 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,001 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 303 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 $BTC is hovering around the $80,000 level. Weekly close is the most important here, as Bitcoin is very close to the 50W MA. A weekly close above it could make a strong case that the bottom is in. 👀
❤2
🚨 2026 MONTHLY CANDLE PATTERN LOOKS LIKE THE 2022 CYCLE BOTTOM. The pattern looks surprisingly similar to 2022. Could history be repeating itself?
BNB Chain's Executive Director of Growth says lowering blockchain gas fees is no longer the priority. Sustainable business models are.
👏1🔥1🥰1
China produced less than 3% of the world's manufactured goods in 1990. Today, it produces nearly 30% - more than the US, Japan and Germany combined.
👏1🔥1🥰1
🚨 If you're feeling bad about your investment decisions... 🇹🇷 Turkey has sold and used tens of billions of dollars in FX and gold reserves to defend the Lira. And the Lira still keeps struggling. Sometimes, even governments can’t fight the market forever. 👀
👏1🔥1🥰1
Interesting
👌3🤗2👏1
So true 😂
👍3
My BNB position is still opened and just make $17,000 in this trade..🔥 Seriously this is amazing 😍 If you hold right coin with good fundamentals, you get the confidence to hold that for long term. Cheers for this win 🍾
❤3
$ETH tapped the $2,450 resistance again and got rejected. Now Ethereum needs to hold $2,400, or it could drop another 8%–10%.
🚨 FED RATE HIKE BACK IN FOCUS 🇺🇸 Markets are now expecting the Fed to hike rates in September. The odds have risen after the strong August jobs report. A rate hike could put pressure on risk assets like Bitcoin.
🇮🇳 Binance’s Bigger Focus on India Binance is looking at India beyond just crypto trading. The country’s technology, digital payments and growing financial ecosystem could make it an important part of Binance’s next phase. 🚀 Key Highlights 🇮🇳 India Is A Priority India has a strong developer ecosystem, growing digital finance adoption and huge potential for digital assets. 🌐 Beyond Crypto Binance’s vision cover…
Showing the 12 most recent of 303 posts we hold for @CryptoTvIndia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@CryptoTvIndia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you guys agree with this??
- Yes81%
- No24%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Kya apne yeh trade li??
- Yes38%
- No73%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Are you guys Ready ?
- Yes89%
- No11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ap sabko yeh trade kesi lagi ??
- Bhut badia54%
- Bhut zada badia 🤣54%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Kya apne yeh trade li??
- Yes40%
- No67%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Once everyone has created their accounts and made the deposit, let me know. I’ll share the trade then.
- Yes88%
- No13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 303 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@CryptoKingKeyur · 684,644#1
@airdropsupdatein · 1,365#2
@moneygurudigi · 79,282#3
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 142,346#4
@hamster_kombat · 21,257,954#5
@mastercryptohq · 271,710#6
@hamster_digest · 399,002#7
@cryptoamanclub · 105,397#8
@T_airdrop_kanishk · 6,042#9
@CryptoTalksBudhil · 90,783#10
@cryptoshubhrantchaudhary · 70,988#11
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,570#12
@crypto_expertYT · 6,733#13
@cryptosutraofficial · 43,009#14
@odes_ai · 358,232#15
@KeyGen_Channel · 190,438#16
@freetonairdropfee · 10,235#17
@cryptoairdropcrown · 50,363#18
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,565,591#19
@MoC_Airdrop · 29,714#20
@techranjanofficial · 49,166#21
@spyongems · 49,519#22
@shivamcryptouniverse · 57,419#23
@earncryptowithazu · 4,461#24
@cryptowithbhavesh · 25,734#25
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,627,711#26
@mgdairdrops · 5,221#27
@shubhratewari · 11,485#28
@learnwithronykapoor · 33,312#29
@CryptoRanjan · 22,512#30
@EarnWithSSTube · 26,794#31
@cryptofam_eng · 604,743#32
@theTapCoins · 2,990,727#33
@THE_CRYPTO_CHIPS · 13,820#34
@cryptoanshuclub · 1,888#35
@open4profit · 80,739#36
@cryptocrownofficial · 43,209#37
@officialbitprofit · 8,698#38
@maskedbharat1 · 4,908#39
@Malik_developer · 6,775#40
@thecryptopandit · 4,427#41
@startfromzerofamily · 44,522#42
@buertradesofficial · 10,153#43
@Crick_Stocks · 5,075#44
@glciofficial · 3,328#45
@Flip_Airdrop · 3,436#46
@weekshit_crypto · 9,453#47
@thecryptometic · 9,918#48
@TheFootballCity · 272,944#49
@smc_Kapil_Dev · 425,739#50
@blumcrypto · 14,700,866#51
@notcoin · 8,803,455#52
@Cats_housewtf · 8,129,863#53
@catapult_extreme · 8,681,649#54
@next10xgem1 · 333,179#55
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,061,340#56
@realgoats_channel · 4,773,562#57
@theyescoin · 5,828,260#58
@gram · 6,785,001#59
@tonkeeper_news · 4,879,583#60
@iamalexfalcon · 3,153,710#61
@seedupdates · 8,436,482#62
@Cryptoniicks · 8,480#63
@pigscrew · 2,182,770#64
@hotonnear · 4,747,491#65
@mediarussia · 1,519,076#66
@hipofinance · 762,103#67
@onus_globalchannel · 1,682,270#68
@coincoinai · 1,800,220#69
@gameechannel · 1,930,034#70
@dotcoincommunity · 4,046,866#71
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,703#72
@dogs · 7,196,362#73
@moonbergai · 298,981#74
@catizenann · 3,641,479#75
@banana_update · 1,424,852#76
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,179,204#77
@rockyrabbitio · 3,557,418#78
@tapswapai · 10,541,428#79
@CherryTrendingEVM · 878,546#80
@babydogecoin · 1,034,620#81
@fx_holding_community · 6,226,119#82
@monorixofficial · 1,362,868#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@abituriyentlar_kanali2026 · 91,967
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
@moneygurudigi · 79,282
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
@cryptoshubhrantchaudhary · 70,988
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 142,346
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,570
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
@mastercryptohq · 271,710
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@spyongems · 49,519
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@shivamcryptouniverse · 57,419
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@cryptoairdropcrown · 50,363
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@cryptowithkiran · 37,689
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
@CryptoTalksBudhil · 90,783
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@cryptoamanclub · 105,397
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@cryptosutraofficial · 43,009
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@dilsetrader7 · 77,819
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
@Shubham13LMentor · 43,861
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
@learnwithronykapoor · 33,312
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@NoMaiMaiVerse · 235,578
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
@faizanharoontelegram · 52,807
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@moonbergai · 298,981
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 19 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto TV India (Crypto Asad)” (@CryptoTvIndia), 30,376 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoTvIndia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.