Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فيصل عثمان

Channel

فيصل عثمان

@FayssalOthmane

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,139subscribers

-267 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001498043517
TypeChannel
Username@FayssalOthmane
CreatedBetween 1 August 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/FayssalOthmane

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1396,4066,272.56 August 2026 — 6,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,405 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,387 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,380 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,365 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,352 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,345 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,337 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,331 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,319 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,302 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,293 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,290 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,277 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,258 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,225 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,221 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,212 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,201 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,195 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,189 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,180 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,168 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,155 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,146 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,139 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -267. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,099–6,446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 23:166,139-7
5 Nov 2026, 02:456,146-9
1 Nov 2026, 16:366,155-13
29 Oct 2026, 19:296,168-12
27 Oct 2026, 01:266,180-9
23 Oct 2026, 18:386,189-6
21 Oct 2026, 05:016,195-6
18 Oct 2026, 07:466,201-11
15 Oct 2026, 18:296,212-9
13 Oct 2026, 00:446,221-4
6 Oct 2026, 17:196,225-33
29 Sept 2026, 11:156,258-19
19 Sept 2026, 16:396,277-13
15 Sept 2026, 11:426,290-3
12 Sept 2026, 00:366,293-9
7 Sept 2026, 18:016,302-17
2 Sept 2026, 19:196,319-12
30 Aug 2026, 09:566,331-6
27 Aug 2026, 07:356,337-8
24 Aug 2026, 02:166,345first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 6,139 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held41 (6 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total17,524
Reactions total534
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 55s
Average length
1m 37s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,584 reactions across 41 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,00863.6%
😡33221.0%
🔥1026.44%
🫡875.49%
👏513.22%
⚡40.253%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC243 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

فيما تعلّق بالعدوّ، وفي الخط العام، لا فرق بين ديمقراطي وجمهوري، ولا بين يميني ويساري، ولا بين معتدل ومتطرّف، ولا بين يهودي وصهيوني... تلك تفاصيل أهمّ أهلها وحدهم.

👏11🔥2

1 Nov 2026, 22:11 UTC609 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

مازال أهلكم يستصرخون بقيّة نخوة فيكم. إن عجزتم عن الفعل فلا تعجزوا عن المساهمة بأموالكم. قوا أنفسكم نارًا فإن عاقبة الخذلان مريرة!

❤29

1 Nov 2026, 21:56 UTC502 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @melhamyPhoto

بغير أن أبحث ولا أقصد.. بينما كنت أراجع شيئا في كتاب "ظلام السجن" لمحمد علي الطاهر، جاءتني هذه الفقرة المكثفة! ومحمد علي الطاهر شخصية معروفة في النصف الأول من القرن العشرين، مصري فلسطيني، وكان من النخبة المصرية، وكونه لم يعد الآن معروفا ومذكورا فإنما ذلك من طبع هذه الدنيا التي تجعل كل مذكور منسيًّا، وكم من نجم كان ساطعا في زمانه ثم صار مغمورا بالكلية!! وقد هيَّجت هذه الفقرةُ خاطرةَ هيمنت عليّ خلال هذا الأسبوع المنص…

❤6🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 20:28 UTC740 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

ما أصدقكم وما أحقر من خذلكم! الشهيد يحيى السنوار في مكالمة مع الشهيد القائد محمد الضيف لحظة إعلان وقف إطلاق النار عام 2021

❤55🫡8⚡3

27 Oct 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,110 views35 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ملك البندورة يتفاخر بقتل أطفال درعا كما تفاخر الأسد قبله بذلك، وكما يتفاخر ملك البابجي بقتل اليمنيين، وابن زايد بقتل السودانييين، والمبرّر الذي يشتركون فيه هو محاربة الإرهاب. ليست المشكلة في هؤلاء الخونة الذين ابتليت بهم الأمة فأمرهم جلّي، إنما المشكلة في هذه الشعوب التي يبرّر جزء عريض منها جرائم هؤلاء الأنذال بداعي الوطنية.

❤30🫡3🔥1😡1

26 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC≈1,090 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026

جيش ملك البندورة الذي يشتغل قبّة حديدية لحماية اليهود قام بقتل 5 مواطنين سوريين في ريف درعا جنوب سوريا. هذا الجيش الذي لم يطلق رصاصة واحدة تجاه الصهاااينة يستأسد على المستضعفين فقط. سوريا المسكينة كان ناقصها فقط قصف جيش ابن البريطانية.

😡31🔥1

25 Oct 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,150 views49 reactionsread 6 November 2026

أطلق أخي هشام مطاطله حملة لمساندة إخواننا في غزة تستهدف مشاركة شهرية بمبلغ 1000 دج فقط يدفعها كلّ متابع لصفحته. أهيب بكم جميعا أن يكون لكم مساهمة في ذلك. نحن هنا 45 ألفًا، لو يساهم النصف فقط انظروا كم سنجمع لأهلنا في غزة. من يريد المساهمة يتواصل في فيسبوك على الخاص مع صاحب المبادرة جزاه الله خيرًا. #حملة_الالف_دينار

❤48👏1

23 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,440 views56 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ما أبهى أصحاب السلاح الطاهر! من الخليل بعد القضاء على اثنين 🐷 في عملية مباركة هذا الصباح.

❤54🫡2

21 Oct 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,260 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @a2qanita1

أزمة المجاعة في غزة تطل برأسها من جديد، بعد نجاح الاحتلال في هندستها خلال الأشهر الماضية عبر اعتماد سياسة التنقيط لبعض الاحتياجات الأساسية، ومنع دخول الكثير من الأصناف أصلاً، بحيث لا تغطي حاجة الناس حد الاكتفاء، مما يجعل الأسواق دائماً متعطشة لهذه البضائع. تعود أزمة المجاعة بقوة بسبب منع وتقليص الاحتلال إدخال الخضروات والفواكه واللحوم المجمدة والأغذية الأساسية، والاكتفاء بكميات ضئيلة جداً لا تكفي حاجة الناس. يا مسل…

😡21👏5

18 Oct 2026, 20:53 UTC≈1,380 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @eayid3

قرأتم أن الدُنيا قد أمطرت اليوم في غزة، وهذا شيءٌ محمودٌ نشكر الله عليه، فالحمدُ لكَ يا ربي على نعمة المطر..لكن الذي لم تقرأوه ولم تشاهدوه أن كثيرًا مِن الخيام البالية المتهالكة قد غرقت، والدنيا لم تمطر بعد بغزارة، وأن خبر غرق الخيام ستقرأونه كثيرًا، وسيتردد على مسامعكم بشكلٍ متكررٍ ما لم تنقذوا أهل الخيام من هذه المآسي التي تنتظرهم، ومن المطر الذي يهدد خيامهم وأطفالهم وحياتهم.

❤27

17 Oct 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,380 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @a2qanita1Video

ليسمعها مشايخ الكبسة ولحى السوء.. الشيخ د. محسن العواجي -فك الله أسره- يتحدث عن المجاهدين في غزة وكأنه بيننا اليوم.

❤39🔥7

17 Oct 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,210 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

كل يوم يسخر هذا الخنزير القذر من اسم نبيّنا صلى الله عليه وسلم ولا أحد يردّ عليه. هؤلاء الحكام الذين يصمتون عليه هم أنفسهم من يتابعوننا في المحاكم بدعاوى إثارة البلبة وتهديد الأمن العام في حال دعونا إلى مجرّد وقفة أمام سفارة هذا الخنزير.

😡31

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @FayssalOthmane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أحمد قنيطة
@a2qanita1 · 21,469
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
الكذاب الدولي
@kedhab · 18,751
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 5 October 2026
مجدي المغربي - فلسطين - قطاع غزة
@mogr7775 · 20,896
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
أدهم شرقاوي
@adhamsharkawii1 · 84,893
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
نون بوست
@noonpost · 29,880
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
🍃لله ثم للتاريخ🍃
@llilahthumlilttrikh · 25,331
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
قناة د. وصفي أبو زيد
@drwasfy · 31,079
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
د. أبو محمود نائل
@dr_naelgazy · 37,522
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فيصل عثمان” (@FayssalOthmane), 6,139 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FayssalOthmane.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.