Галерея 🤍
Views per post sit far below this size band
153 average views per post against 125,119 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.122%. Across the 2,340 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,022–316,171 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.39% and 20.6%, with a median of 9.80%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 221 of 221 published in the window (221 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 33,692 |
| Mature posts only | 0.191% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 125,119 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:rus · 2,340 channels · p10 2.03% · p25 4.39% · p50 9.80% · p75 20.6% · p90 32.9% |
| Position in cohort | 0.470th percentile · 1/83 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.231% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
