24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,828–18,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 03:28
18,918
-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:33
18,919
-3
28 Aug 2026, 04:03
18,922
-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:56
18,923
-3
26 Aug 2026, 08:33
18,926
-3
25 Aug 2026, 09:57
18,929
+2
24 Aug 2026, 13:16
18,927
+27
22 Aug 2026, 23:44
18,900
+51
21 Aug 2026, 15:44
18,849
-2
20 Aug 2026, 11:06
18,851
-3
19 Aug 2026, 12:23
18,854
-1
18 Aug 2026, 15:16
18,855
+2
17 Aug 2026, 13:38
18,853
+9
16 Aug 2026, 08:06
18,844
+3
14 Aug 2026, 18:12
18,841
-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:52
18,842
-10
11 Aug 2026, 12:16
18,852
-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:42
18,853
-4
9 Aug 2026, 14:16
18,857
+4
8 Aug 2026, 17:41
18,853
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 18,918 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,250
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.137%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
47 (28 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
153,090
Reactions total
204
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,330
Links
≈3,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
304 reactions across 44 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
216
71.1%
👍
27
8.88%
👏
14
4.61%
🙏
14
4.61%
🆒
12
3.95%
💯
9
2.96%
🥰
8
2.63%
😁
3
0.987%
🤨
1
0.329%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📡 주간 퀀트 코멘트 (‘26.8.30, 하나증권 이경수)
✔️엔비디아, 미국 실적 전체를 끌어올리다
💬엔비디아 실적 편중화 심화, 미국 실적모멘텀 글로벌 최상위, 반도체 및 전기장비, 기술하드웨어, 바이오가 실적 상향 상위, 반면 상호미디어, 에너지, 자동차, 음식료는 하위
💬Nvidia (NVDA) — 8/26 장 마감 후 ✅ 서프라이즈, 주가 -1.6% → 시간외 +4.7%
매출 $96.22억(YoY +106%, 컨센 $92.07B 대비 +4.5% 서프라이즈). 총이익률 75.0%(YoY +260bp). 데이터센터 $89.0B(총매출 92.7%, YoY +117%) — 하이퍼스케일러 $49B·그외(소버린AI,온프레미스 등) $40B(YoY +138%)으로 처음으로 오픈웨이트 관련 비중이 절반에 근접. FCF $21.3B. Q3 가이던스…
8/31일 하나증권 전략 이재만
[9월 주식시장 전망과 전략] 무엇을 사서 4분기를 대비할까
▶자료: https://bit.ly/4ycnOo1
* 1980년 이후 미국 중간선거가 있었던 연도의 9월은 S&P500지수와 코스피 월 평균 수익률은 마이너스였고, 상승확률도 45%에 불과. 오히려 10~11월에는 지수는 플러스, 상승확률도 높았음
* 미국 명목성장률을 감안 시 10년물 국채금리가 5%에 근접하면 지수 하락 압력 높아짐. 금리 상승의 구조적인 이유는 투자 중심 경제 성장. 다만 장기채 중심 바이백과 GENIUS Act 통해 금리 하락 유도
* 2000년 이후 미국 10년물 국채금리 4% 이상, S&P500지수 EPS 증가율 10% 이상 연도의 이익 증가율 대비 주가 수익률 비율의 상단 0.89배. 2027년 S&P500 EPS 증가…
[하나증권 퀀트 이경수] [실전 퀀트(Quant MP)] 고금리의 산물, 종목 장세
▲ CAPEX 과도한 빅테크 기업의 4분기 계절성
- 8월 시장은 글로벌 CAPEX 부담이 큰 빅테크 기업들이 고금리 환경에 고착되면서, 빅테크에 집중됐던 수급이 아래로 흘러내리는 낙수효과로 종목 장세가 형성된 국면
- 미국과 한국에서 공통적으로 관찰된 특징이며, 8월 미국 고CAPEX 팩터의 부진과 금리 간 뚜렷한 역상관이 이를 뒷받침
- 여기에 계절성도 존재. 미국의 시가총액 대비 고CAPEX 및 CAPEX 증가 팩터는 9월부터 연말까지 부진한 경향을 반복
- 배경에는 1~3분기 동안 ‘추정치’로 계상되던 비용이 회계연도 말에 실제치로 정산되면서, 매출원가와 판관비에 내재된 발생주의 추정치가 4분기에 대거 확정되는 구조
- Binz & Kapons(202…
🥲하향 주요 종목
Berkshire Hathaway -6.2 +4.5 Q2 보험 인수손해율 악화 + BHE 에너지 이란 재긴장 가이던스 불확실성
Glencore -5.1 +3.1 석탄 수요 구조적 감소 + 구리 제련 마진 압박 + 중국 경기 부진
Xiaomi -4.5 -9.9 메모리·파운드리 공급부족으로 스마트폰 원가 급등. 가격 전가 한계
FedEx -3.9 -0.3 글로벌 항공화물 물동량 감소 + 이란 재긴장에도 항공 대체 효과 제한
Lowe's -1.2 -1.6 동일점포 +0.2% — 홈디포 대비 150bp 격차(최근 최대). 연간 가이던스 하단 하향
Tencent -1.5 -3.7 게임 신규 허가 지연 + AI 콘텐츠 규제 강화 + 위챗 광고 수익화 성장 둔화
Alibaba -1.2 +2.1 이커머스 경쟁 심화(핀둬둬·틱톡) + 클라…
📡 주간 퀀트 코멘트 (‘26.8.23, 하나증권 이경수)
✔️AI 데이터센터 관련 산업재, 전자장비, 반도체, 기술하드웨어 업종이 글로벌 실적 상향 리드 지속
💬Home Depot (HD) — 8/18 장 전 ✅ EPS 비트, 매출 소폭 미스
매출 $431.7억(YoY +1.4%, 컨센 소폭 미스). EPS 컨센 상회. 동일점포 +1.7%(4년 만에 최고). "주택시장 frozen 상태이나 소규모 프로젝트 수요 견조."
💬Target (TGT) — 8/19 장 전 ✅ 어닝 서프라이즈
동일점포 컨센 대폭 상회. 주가 3달 +20%. 디지털 판매·당일배송·마진 개선 강세. 최근 4분기 중 최강 분기.
💬Lowe's (LOW) — 8/19 장 전 ⚠️ EPS 비트, 매출 미스, 가이던스 하향
매출 $259.6억(컨센 $261.3억 미스). EP…
8/24일 하나증권 전략 이재만
[화수분전략] 금리가 높을 때, 어떤 기업을 사야 할까
▶자료: https://bit.ly/4gao2Wu
* 고금리 국면에서 기업의 효율성(ROE) 개선 여부는 주가 수익률에 영향을 줌
* 우선 2023년 3월~10월까지 연준의 추가적인 2회 기준금리 인상과 10년물 국채금리 상승(3.5%→ 4.9%) 국면에서 S&P500 내 ROE 상승 폭 상위 3개 업종의 평균 주가 수익률은 10%와 하위 3개 업종(-5%) 대비 월등히 높았음
* ROE는 [ROA(순이익/총자산)*재무레버리지 비율(총자산/총자본)]. 시중금리가 상승하는 국면에서는 이익 증가에 대한 신뢰가 높지 않기 때문에 재무레버리지 비율을 높여 ROE 상승에 대한 기대가 높은 기업의 주가 성과가 좋음
* 최근 4개 분기 합산 알파벳의 자본지출 금액…
❤7🥰2
Signed 이재만
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @HANAStrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 72,299 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《하나 주식전략》 이재만과 이경수” (@HANAStrategy), 18,918 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HANAStrategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.