These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
18,800 average views per post against 26,879 subscribers — an engagement rate of 70.1%. Across the 8,334 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.22% and 15.6%, with a median of 7.71%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (10 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Posts measured
36 of 36 published in the window (7 exact, 29 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
678,261
Mature posts only
92.4% over 27 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 9 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 33 days, net +2,860. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 04:15
26,879
-16
5 Sept 2026, 22:36
26,895
+43
3 Sept 2026, 16:56
26,852
+31
2 Sept 2026, 10:11
26,821
-66
1 Sept 2026, 11:17
26,887
+33
31 Aug 2026, 14:13
26,854
+82
30 Aug 2026, 12:54
26,772
+90
29 Aug 2026, 10:06
26,682
-11
28 Aug 2026, 07:34
26,693
+19
27 Aug 2026, 07:54
26,674
-37
26 Aug 2026, 08:32
26,711
+54
25 Aug 2026, 12:02
26,657
+46
24 Aug 2026, 12:37
26,611
+57
22 Aug 2026, 22:16
26,554
+75
21 Aug 2026, 08:42
26,479
-34
20 Aug 2026, 10:35
26,513
-3
19 Aug 2026, 09:03
26,516
+26,484
11 Aug 2026, 20:47
32
-24,035
10 Aug 2026, 23:43
24,067
+12
9 Aug 2026, 23:33
24,055
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
70.1%
avg views ÷ 26,879 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,800
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
36
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
63 (6 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
678,261
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
بازی دادن ادما یه ضعفه به عقده هاتون افتخار نکنید.
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @MatinAndHisFriends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MatinAndHisFriends named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@playlist named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
@download named in 1 post, 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@never named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بیگ شگی | Big Shaggy @BigShaggyReal · 29,842 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 September 2026
𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂 𝐃𝐎𝐙𝐇𝐀𝐌 @MUSIC_DOZHAM · 44,076 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
Hossein Tiem | حسین تی ام @TiemReal · 33,136 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
ReMixee RapY | ریمیکسه رپی @ReMixeeRapY · 43,729 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“متین و دوستانش” (@MatinAndHisFriends), 26,879 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MatinAndHisFriends.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
