Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 62 days, net +37,048. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,259–81,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 10:59
75,864
+1,055
7 Nov 2026, 05:31
74,809
+1,325
6 Nov 2026, 05:59
73,484
+1,349
5 Nov 2026, 01:47
72,135
+2,241
4 Nov 2026, 05:07
69,894
+1,355
3 Nov 2026, 07:35
68,539
+159
2 Nov 2026, 08:38
68,380
-653
1 Nov 2026, 10:01
69,033
-1,334
31 Oct 2026, 08:55
70,367
-761
30 Oct 2026, 09:16
71,128
-130
29 Oct 2026, 12:41
71,258
-411
28 Oct 2026, 09:20
71,669
-270
27 Oct 2026, 12:44
71,939
-201
26 Oct 2026, 15:59
72,140
-508
25 Oct 2026, 16:09
72,648
+2,143
24 Oct 2026, 16:18
70,505
+2,286
23 Oct 2026, 13:35
68,219
+509
22 Oct 2026, 11:44
67,710
+3,460
21 Oct 2026, 07:46
64,250
+308
20 Oct 2026, 02:40
63,942
first reading
Engagement
1,083 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 75,864 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
713 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.848%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
713
of 1,083 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 699 of 713 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
1,083 (29 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
7,213,812
Reactions total
61,030
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 19:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,400
Videos
≈210
Links
≈475
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 35s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
64,521 reactions across 974 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 6.09% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙉
3,927
6.09%
🙊
3,684
5.71%
🍌
2,764
4.28%
💋
2,636
4.09%
👍
2,601
4.03%
💯
2,600
4.03%
🔥
2,595
4.02%
🏆
2,541
3.94%
🤗
2,527
3.92%
🤣
2,526
3.92%
😁
2,508
3.89%
🙏
2,507
3.89%
❤
2,472
3.83%
😍
2,433
3.77%
👌
2,427
3.76%
🦄
2,378
3.69%
🎉
2,345
3.63%
🥰
2,340
3.63%
😎
2,335
3.62%
⚡
2,236
3.47%
6 further kinds
12,139
18.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 974 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64,521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 713 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The White House has signaled a possible easing of tensions in the Middle East. President Trump told CNN that renewed strikes on Iran are “highly unlikely” if talks make progress on its nuclear program and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
The shift could ease geopolitical risks for global markets. Still, traders should remain cautious until formal agreements are reached.
What can trigger a Binance account review, and what should users know?
https://x.com/News_crypto/status/2119377579043885074?a=V-sFciWRWSTvGYLgj4w&s=20
https://newscrypto.org/news/binance-account-reviews-explained-what-triggers-scrutiny-and-what-users-need-to-know/
Russia has opened a limited path to retail crypto trading. Starting November 17, licensed intermediaries can offer access to #Bitcoin, #Ethereum and USDT.
Non-qualified investors will be capped at 300,000 rubles, about $3,700, in purchases per year through each intermediary.
Crypto is moving further into Russia’s regulated financial system. But the central bank still sets the limits.
What can make Binance raise an eyebrow?
First, a friend sends you money. Then your family does the same, or you transfer funds from another exchange to Binance. Money arriving from a gambling site may also attract attention.
Trade leveraged futures and win more than $50,000? Your account may be frozen while Binance asks for further information.
And if you deposit a large sum without explaining where the funds came…
UK influencer MoDeen won a boxing match last night, but the result was overshadowed by a confrontation with Tommy Robinson. After the bout, MoDeen reportedly jumped on Robinson’s head, injuring his neck.
Robinson said he is consulting his legal team and intends to pursue charges against MoDeen, seeking a prison sentence. MoDeen defended his actions, saying they were a response to Robinson’s alleged remark: “I hope a…
Zachxbt has made a shocking comparison: if Ansem gets life in prison, crypto influencer Sahil should be executed for scamming more people.
The prominent on-chain investigator put it this way: “If Ansem goes jail for life than Sahil should be executed for scamming more people.”
Thai police are widening their investigation into Shuffle com, a crypto gambling platform. Data from three crypto exchanges is helping them trace the funds.
A former Holograph Foundation employee in France has been sentenced to five years in prison. Two years must be served.
The sentence follows the illegal minting of 1 billion HLG tokens in 2024, valued at approximately $14 million.
How can Russia’s use of cryptocurrency to evade sanctions be addressed? The European Union has established a sanctions task force to tackle the issue.
😭16🎉11😱11😘10🔥9😎9😨9🙊9
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,083 posts we hold for @NFOfficialAirdrop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 NEWS @Crypto_FDNEW · 60,727 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
Jaallattoota Liverpool Qofaaf ²⁰²⁶/²⁷ @LIIVARPUULL · 26,539 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 30 September 2026
Ethio zodiac/ ዞዳይክ @zodiac_channels · 37,255 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NF Official Airdrop” (@NFOfficialAirdrop), 75,864 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NFOfficialAirdrop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.