Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 43 days, net -3,187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 06:54
58,619
-185
16 Sept 2026, 18:18
58,804
+58,758
16 Sept 2026, 12:40
46
-58,880
14 Sept 2026, 20:59
58,926
-162
13 Sept 2026, 08:00
59,088
-168
11 Sept 2026, 09:57
59,256
-196
8 Sept 2026, 18:16
59,452
+59,414
7 Sept 2026, 19:56
38
-59,644
5 Sept 2026, 12:17
59,682
-172
3 Sept 2026, 14:38
59,854
-95
2 Sept 2026, 06:37
59,949
-115
1 Sept 2026, 03:18
60,064
-83
31 Aug 2026, 04:35
60,147
-93
30 Aug 2026, 04:14
60,240
-47
29 Aug 2026, 18:00
60,287
no change
29 Aug 2026, 17:45
60,287
+60,279
29 Aug 2026, 09:02
8
-60,432
28 Aug 2026, 06:33
60,440
-73
27 Aug 2026, 06:12
60,513
-62
26 Aug 2026, 08:03
60,575
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.02%
avg views ÷ 58,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,700
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
26 (21 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
51,705
Reactions total
1,021
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 03:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
187
Videos
2
Links
177
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,501 reactions across 26 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
514
20.6%
👍
403
16.1%
👾
274
11.0%
😎
264
10.6%
❤
240
9.60%
🎉
192
7.68%
🆒
133
5.32%
💯
120
4.80%
🐳
82
3.28%
🍾
64
2.56%
❤🔥
56
2.24%
⚡
39
1.56%
🏆
34
1.36%
🤝
31
1.24%
🍓
13
0.52%
👨💻
11
0.44%
🍌
9
0.36%
🕊
9
0.36%
😇
9
0.36%
🤡
4
0.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,501 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⏳3 DAYS LEFT TO ENTER: $5,000 COMMUNITY GIVEAWAY!⏳
The clock is ticking! We are officially wrapping up the giveaway and announcing our 10 lucky winners in just 3 days! Haven't joined yet? There is still time to secure your spot and grab your share of the prize pool: 10 Winners $500 Cash Each (Credited straight to your account)
Jump in, play, and take your shot at the $500 cash drop. Best of luck to everyone partici…
Welcome, guys! 🔥
We’re kicking off an absolute banger of a stream tonight. 🚀 The vibes are on point ✨, the balance is loaded 💰, and we’re hunting those monster multipliers and max wins! 🎰⚡
We’ve got high-stakes bonus buys lined up 💣, top-tier slots 🍒, and pure adrenaline from start to finish.
let’s run it up together! 🏆🤑
🚨 Live Stream!
🖥 Stream 🥩 Stake
EXCLUSIVE $5,000 COMMUNITY GIVEAWAY 🏆
It is time to give back to the high rollers. We are turning up the heat and dropping $5,000 directly into the hands of our most dedicated community members!
THE PRIZE POOL
Total Pool: $5,000
Winners: 10 lucky players
Reward: $500 each, drawn completely at random
HOW TO ENTER
Be a Referral: Must be registered on Stake using our official referral link
Monthly Volume: Have a m…
BIGGEST WIN OF THE CENTURY OR TOTAL BUST?! 🚨 Testing High-RTP Slots to the Limit 💸💥 Pure Adrenaline! 📈🤑
✅ Live Stream!
🖥 Stream: https://kick.com/satoshi-kick
🥩 Stake: stake.com/?c=u5KQ6wEk
Sun, salt, and pure gold on the horizon. 🌊☀️
Spent the last few days completely disconnected from screens, breathing in the sea air, and soaking up every last bit of this summer energy. Nothing clears your head like watching the sunset roll in over the waves while the beach settles down. After countless late-night sessions and endless spins, you need moments like this to reset the balance and build up that winning a…
What an absolute banger of a day: the weather is amazing, the energy is at an all-time high, and the mood is set to crush some slots and hunt for massive multipliers! ☀️🔥
Feeling like luck is right around the corner today. What do you say—should we jump on a stream tonight, or line up a heavy session over the next few days? 🎰
If you’ve been missing the big wins, good vibes, and want to see the stream go live, smash…
🚀 Official Partnership Announcement 🚀
I’m excited to announce my official partnership with Stake.com and Stake.us!
Use my exclusive code Satoshi when you sign up or make a deposit to unlock these rewards:
🏆 $1,000 Leaderboard – Compete and climb the ranks for a shot at the prize pool
💰 $25–$60 every $10,000 wagered – Consistent cash rewards based on your play
🎁 Bonus Giveaway: I’m giving away $10 to 3 lucky peopl…
I HAVE A HORSESHOE UP MY ASS! FUCKING SAVED!
oh code Satoshi by the way on .com and .us!
🖥 Stream: https://kick.com/satoshi-kick
🥩 Stake: stake.com/?c=u5KQ6wEk
🆒31❤15🎉11🔥10👍6🤝5🐳4
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @PROFlT_CRYPTO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Trading in the crypto @CRYPTO_HACKlNG · 62,121 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
PRO 💎 CRYPTO @proton_invest · 59,000 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto ☠️ NWO @BlTCOlN_one · 48,988 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
SLOTS 👑 777 @slots_winrate777 · 42,242 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Maribston {🦅} @CryptoMaribstone · 40,224 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 29 August 2026
БУДКА ЛЕНДЕРА @bender_live · 360,105 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Crypto QuickNet⚡️ @cryptoquicknetuakh · 239,026 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
DARKWING DUCK @bunnnycrypto · 33,756 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
⚡️Инвестиции Григория @tg_majorka · 84,641 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
TONomania | Crypto @T0Nomania · 155,962 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Insider Alpha Hunter @AlphaHuntIns · 94,764 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Crypto🪼Движ @CryptoDvisj · 295,108 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
CRYPTO EXTRASIDE @crypto_extraside · 412,509 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Янукович в крипте @YanucovihInCrypto · 39,436 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
CRYPTO DZEN @cryptodzenq · 48,784 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Satoshi Kick Stream 🎲” (@PROFlT_CRYPTO), 58,619 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Satoshi_kick.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.