برترین پاسور های این فصل پنج لیگ معتبر اروپایی @PaseGoal

Channel
PaseGoal | پاس گل
@PaseGoal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,816subscribers
-4,647 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002114811725 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PaseGoal |
| Description | تعرفه تبلیغات https://t.me/tch_ads گل های بازیها: https://t.me/golpasegol |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PaseGoal |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 63,816 | -209 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 64,025 | -127 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 64,152 | -151 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 64,303 | -202 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 64,505 | -259 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 64,764 | -301 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 65,065 | -168 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:26 | 65,233 | -107 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 65,340 | -111 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 65,451 | -91 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 65,542 | -96 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 65,638 | -98 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 65,736 | -111 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 65,847 | -97 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 65,944 | -123 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 66,067 | -88 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 66,155 | -184 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 66,339 | -261 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 66,600 | -132 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 66,732 | first reading |
Engagement
1,726 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.775%
- avg views ÷ 63,816 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 495
- 1,087 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.59%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1,087
- of 1,726 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 788 of 1,087 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,726 (6 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 537,714 |
| Reactions total | 6,591 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈31,000
- Videos
- ≈9,320
- Links
- ≈994
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 04m
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 120 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,256 reactions across 702 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 2,535 | 40.5% | |
| ❤ | 1,331 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 784 | 12.5% | |
| 👎 | 446 | 7.13% | |
| 👍 | 422 | 6.75% | |
| 💔 | 403 | 6.44% | |
| 😐 | 207 | 3.31% | |
| 😁 | 128 | 2.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 728 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PaseGoal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
کی قدر بدونه @PaseGoal
🤣14
مثلث تیمای مطرح اروپا @PaseGoal
🤣7❤2
حضور کیر کلفت ترین هافبک های تاریخ در تمرینات فرانسه و هلند @PaseGoal
🔥9
تیمای باقی مونده در 5 لیگ معتبر اروپایی که تا اینجای فصل باخت نداشتن @PaseGoal
🔥4👎1
ازبکستان نبود ایران دیگه با کی بازی دوستانه میکرد @PaseGoal
🤣12👍2
بیانیه رسمی اتلتیکو: ما اومدیم اشتباهای داوری به نفع رئالو چاپ کنیم ولی دیدیم محیط زیست نابود میشه و درختای جهان نصف میشه @PaseGoal
🤣18👍1👎1
🚀 پلن نامحدود فقط 180 هزار تومان | 🤖 برای خرید اینجا کلیک کنید
دکلان رایس سومین بازیکن جوان تاریخ پرمیرلیگ شد که به 300 بازی میرسه @PaseGoal
❤7
تو صدا سیما عالیشاه رو مسخره کردن @PaseGoal
👎12🤣3
اما من قشنگ ترین و عاشقانه ترین متن ها و تک بیتی هارو اینجا دیدم 👌 @dubity_hivaa @dubity_hivaa
🔥2❤1💔1
اسپویل از آخرین تلاش های بیرانوند اگه قضیه اعصاب روان و رباط دستش به نتیجه نرسه: @PaseGoal
🤣8
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,726 posts we hold for @PaseGoal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@magicvpnn · 35,5656 postsOCTPUSVPN
@OCTPUSVPN · 715 postsShirazVPN | شیراز وی پی ان
@Shiraz_VPN_Free · 2,3935 postsElden VPN | الدن وی پی ان
@EldenVpn3 · 10,1944 postsHajm Agha | حجم آقا
@Hajmagha · 6524 postsVincci_vpn |کانال
@Vincci_vpn · 2,3442 postsZikoTech
@ZikoTech · 1,1712 postsNOTRON VPN | نوترون
@notronvpn_store · 38,9512 postsver2 vpn
@ver2vpn · 3,5102 postsاکانت آباد
@AccAbad · 5,9681 postAzizz Vpn
@Azizz_vpn · 3,4331 postDigiato | دیجیاتو
@Digiato · 113,5071 postMistidey Stream🟢🟣
@MistideyStream · 2,0901 postنور | Noor
@Noor_art08 · 16,7581 postOSCAR VPN |اسکار وی پی ان
@OSCARVPN_tem · 321 postتوییتی
@TweetyChannel · 782,2461 postVPN STORE
@VPN_BESTV2RAY · 1,2711 postخرید اکانت هوش مصنوعی - جمنای - کرسر - gemini
@aiaccountshopchannel · 1,0521 postاتصال پایا
@etesal_paya · 1,8281 postفوت غار | Footghar
@footghar · 1,9361 postVPN.HAJI
@napstereetvvpn · 1,0301 postParhambarber
@parhambarberr · 201 postcrypto plus
@pluss_io · 23,9861 postنقل قول؛
@quottations · 10,8511 postRetro Net | کانفیگ رِترو| اینترنت آزاد
@retropingshop · 1,1351 postSilent NetWork
@silnt_network · 2,4911 postSp MeowChat
@spmeow_chat · 1,2101 postاین کانال شعبهی دیگری ندارد (شعبه تلگرام)
@tweetintelgram · 1441 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@vpnpro_ir · 11,3335 postsCharsoVpn ⚡️ چارسو
@ch4arsovpn · 1,5754 postsفال تاروت یوکابد🌞
@fal_yokabed · 2393 posts@falerozhi
@falerozhi · 106,2393 postsMAGIC VPN | مجیک وی پی ان
@magicvpnn · 35,5653 postsNoLimit VPN
@NoLimit_Net · 8943 postsRezayat
@rezayatmagic · 233 postsاکانت پرمیوم Acceto
@Accetoo · 5,0422 postsVEXO | وکسو
@funvexo · 3042 posts𓆩 مــاورا | دعانویسی 𓆪
@mavara_paksaziii · 12,4382 postsنور | Noor
@Noor_art08 · 16,7582 postsOSCAR VPN |اسکار وی پی ان
@OSCARVPN_tem · 322 postsرضایت مشتری
@rezait013 · 212 postsSoor VPN 🚀 | سور وی پی ان رایگان
@SoorVpn · 2832 postsVincci_vpn |کانال
@Vincci_vpn · 2,3442 postsVpn VaslBash | وصل باش
@Vpn_VaslBash · 14,6562 postsZikoTech
@ZikoTech · 1,1712 postsTrust
@ZikoTechtrust · 212 postsفروشگاه کپک / Kapak
@KapakStore · 1,4741 postMozhgannick
@mozhgannick · 7671 postمستر مورفین| اخبار جنگ
@mrphin1 · 29,6401 postنقل قول؛
@quottations · 10,8511 postRetro Net | کانفیگ رِترو| اینترنت آزاد
@retropingshop · 1,1351 postطلاین
@taline · 10,4761 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@PaseGoal named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 20 September 2026 – 20 September 2026
named in 1 post, 17 September 2026 – 17 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@futballbadtv · 323,404#1
@varzesh3 · 1,294,925#2
@FutballBadBoys · 107,222#3
@bistodo · 389,064#4
@SportBaadNews · 914,356#5
@vaarzesh_plus · 316,357#6
@Barca_We · 171,970#7
@bistodo_tweet · 28,817#8
@EsteghlalFc_We · 145,064#9
@FUTBALLI18 · 489,664#10
@Realmadrid_we · 143,259#11
@SportBadTweet · 143,517#12
@FutballBoys · 2#13
@tweet_varzeshplus · 32,888#14
@ft360_ir · 421,602#15
@PesPars · 67,952#16
@SourceShit · 88,739#17
@HipSoccer · 3,685#18
@RealMadridCFz · 258,731#19
@RealMadridTweet · 196,968#20
@Meli_Poroxy · 233,938#21
@iMTProto · 7,490,676#22
@iRoProxy · 7,897,583#23
@TweetyChannel · 782,246#24
@proxy_qavi · 3,410,803#25
@darkproxy · 4,753,824#26
@hamclasixii · 63#27
@drtel · 774,803#28
@CottageOrg · 799,794#29
@weedlashya · 210,199#30
@Fatwite · 47,356#31
@funhiphop · 248,940#32
@MemeHubOriginal · 97,785#33
@proxydaemi · 1,753,381#34
@Herochnl · 383,226#35
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 944,563#36
@roidbest · 1,644,807#37
@chekhabarre · 245,390#38
@hip_hopi · 306,597#39
@raptv · 372,229#40
@razcom · 1,232,708#41
@RapGodNews · 180,063#42
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,891#43
@bistodo_ir · 140,383#44
@akh_mam · 184,096#45
@MARIZMEDIA · 56,827#46
@ir_javan · 635,785#47
@bg_ae · 387,488#48
@proxymtprotoir · 3,253,649#49
@TvMali · 14,209#50
@EfshaKhabar · 274,371#51
@BadCandom · 623,877#52
@NPROXY · 2,413,396#53
@KiriMohems · 215,182#54
@ravanshenasi_movafagh · 2,927#55
@ParsTwt · 506,670#56
@khabarforieh · 200,550#57
@vinyvidzam · 62,358#58
@dgvrz · 82,423#59
@Real_Ayhan · 113,782#60
@proxymtproto · 11,940,791#61
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#62
@rapking · 307,869#63
@HipHopTweety · 207,619#64
@Myporoxy · 4,491,818#65
@randoteam · 477,929#66
@Radiokocsher · 966,334#67
@Nobitexmag · 148,847#68
@animotionart · 497,349#69
@radmehrguitar · 5,572#70
@meme_ol_ski · 220,282#71
@RapPlusNews · 86,869#72
@MEMEZ0NE · 118,264#73
@Hm_companye · 126,874#74
@RapBad_Newz · 270,156#75
@RstCrypto · 393,408#76
@YouBgo · 100,135#77
@rapcity · 80,800#78
@lordcryptovip · 809,725#79
@bit_gold98 · 364,708#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Fatwite · 47,356
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
@kotahforii · 43,207
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
@dgvrz · 82,423
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 August 2026
@randoteam · 477,929
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
@bit_gold98 · 364,708
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PaseGoal | پاس گل” (@PaseGoal), 63,816 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PaseGoal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.