Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
52 measurements spanning 83 days, net -12,252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,061–92,834 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 09:16
78,531
+1,038
1 Nov 2026, 09:34
77,493
-40
31 Oct 2026, 12:31
77,533
+65
30 Oct 2026, 10:35
77,468
+76
29 Oct 2026, 12:09
77,392
+123
28 Oct 2026, 11:37
77,269
+118
27 Oct 2026, 08:40
77,151
+39
26 Oct 2026, 08:30
77,112
-110
25 Oct 2026, 11:09
77,222
-124
24 Oct 2026, 11:45
77,346
-132
23 Oct 2026, 14:15
77,478
-91
22 Oct 2026, 17:16
77,569
-137
21 Oct 2026, 11:26
77,706
-155
20 Oct 2026, 05:50
77,861
-143
19 Oct 2026, 02:46
78,004
-97
18 Oct 2026, 04:56
78,101
-104
17 Oct 2026, 04:57
78,205
-121
16 Oct 2026, 05:35
78,326
-114
15 Oct 2026, 07:16
78,440
-178
14 Oct 2026, 04:37
78,618
first reading
Engagement
1,400 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.737%
avg views ÷ 78,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
579
536 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
536
of 1,400 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 529 of 536 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
1,400 (9 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
310,395
Reactions total
8,252
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Nov 2026, 21:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,730
Videos
≈295
Links
≈43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
38m 47s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 116 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,914 reactions across 970 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,452
58.3%
🤣
4,379
24.4%
🔥
860
4.80%
💔
573
3.20%
💩
570
3.18%
👍
425
2.37%
😐
208
1.16%
❤🔥
195
1.09%
🥰
72
0.402%
👏
46
0.257%
🤯
38
0.212%
😍
31
0.173%
⚡
30
0.167%
👌
16
0.089%
💯
12
0.067%
🏆
5
0.028%
🎉
1
0.006%
🙏
1
0.006%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 973 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,914 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 September 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎮هیجان مسابقات 2 DOTA را با تماشای زنده در وینرو تجربه کنید🎲
✅قهرمانت رو انتخاب کن، تیم رو بساز و برای یک نبرد نفسگیر آماده شو!
🎲 سایت وینرو با بیش از 400 گزینه متنوع برای پیشبینی
✅🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس اولین واریز
✅🤩🤩🤩بونوس واریز کریپتو
✅درگاه اختصاصی برای کاربران 💰
🎲🎲🎲🎲🎲
🤩🇪🇺رای لیونل مسی برای جایزه کوپا:
🥇لمین یامال
🥈پائو کوبارسی
🥉ابراهیم مازا
جالب اینه اگه مسی به جای اینکه اول به یامال رای بده، به کوبارسی رای میداد، کوبارسی برنده جایزه کوپا میشد. چون یامال 96 امتیاز گرفت و کوبارسی 94 امتیاز
@dgvrz|دلقک ورزشی
🔵اونای امری تا حالا ۱۵ بار در ورزشگاه نیوکمپ مقابل بارسلونا مربیگری کرده که حاصلش ۱۴ شکست و فقط ۱ برد بوده!
حالا تیم اونای امری یعنی استون ویلا، فردا باید به مصاف بارسلونا بره
@dgvrz|دلقک ورزشی
🔴زلاتان : زمان ما اگه توی تمرین یه پاس اشتباه میدادی، از ترس خایه نمیکردی بری توی رختکن! اما نسل امروزی، ۱۰ دقیقه بعد از باختنِ بازی، تو اتوبوس بهجای فکر کردن به باخت دارن بحث میکنن که با چه آهنگی برای تیکتاک ویدیو بگیرن
@dgvrz|دلقک ورزشی
🔴از شروع فصل 2025/26 فرمین لوپز تونسته 43 تاثیر گذاری مستقیم داشته باشه؛ 19 گل و 24 پاس گل، بیشتر از تمام هافبک هجومی های حال حاضر جهان 💀
@dgvrz|دلقک ورزشی
❤12🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,400 posts we hold for @dgvrz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 September 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
فوتبال برتر | لیگ ایران | بیست و دو @bistodo_ir · 138,166#67
رپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz @RapBad_Newz · 246,305#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ba30Tweet @Ba30Tweet · 33,962 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 2 September 2026
کانال خبر | اخبار روز ایران و جهان @Fori360 · 93,275 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 August 2026
فرکانس شبکه کانالهای ماهواره Satellite @satlastnews5 · 27,123 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 11 September 2026
توییتر فارسی | Twitter @Fatwite · 44,781 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
خبر کوتاه فوری @kotahforii · 47,023 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان فارکس | آموزش فارکس @forextrder1 · 299,068 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
مشاوره کنکور رندو | سروش جباری @randoteam · 480,127 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
خبرفوری|جام جهانی @khabar_atak · 510,710 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
PaseGoal | پاس گل @PaseGoal · 64,653 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
کریپتو خبر @AlphaGoldClub · 101,472 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
⚠️CRYPTO PLUS+⚠️ @Real_Ayhan · 109,916 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 11 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دلقک فوتبالی” (@dgvrz), 78,531 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dgvrz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.