Channel
@RusskiyBis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,769subscribers
-1,756 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001322583554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RusskiyBis |
| Description | ⚡️ По рекламе - @Biz1ru_bot РКН № 5015612231 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RusskiyBis |
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 41,769 | -96 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 41,865 | -41 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 41,906 | -72 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 41,978 | -58 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 42,036 | -79 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 42,115 | -148 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 42,263 | -101 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 42,364 | -65 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 42,429 | -49 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:53 | 42,478 | -36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 42,514 | -61 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 42,575 | -35 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 42,610 | -46 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 42,656 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 42,670 | -35 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 42,705 | -45 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 42,750 | -55 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 42,805 | -77 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 42,882 | -62 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 42,944 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (17 April 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 42,390 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RusskiyBis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хотите настоящие бизнес-инсайты? Золотое сечение — авторский канал Александра Хруща, топ-менеджера полиметаллического Холдинга, известного своими интересными финансовыми инструментами. Именно он выпустил первые «золотые облигации», первое ЦФА в золоте. Александр постоянно, но не навязчиво делится личными инсайтами и интересными наблюдениями в бизнесе. Там не только про золото и олово, но и широкий взгляд на бизнес: …
Россияне приобрели почти на 50% меньше недвижимости в строящихся объектах Дубая, чем годом ранее — в августе было зарегистрировано 6412 сделок. Продажи готового жилья также снизились на 35% год к году — до 2724 сделок. @RusskiyBis
Обстановка в мире санкций - банка Guinness в России стоит в 5 раз дешевле чем на родине напитка, в Ирландии @RusskiyBis
Бывшей главе УФНС Ямала Яне Калюжиной дали 11 лет колонии за взятки в 11 млн рублей в виде Porsche и ювелирных украшений. По словам подсудимой, она воспринимала это как подарок @RusskiyBis
🦠Война с ВИЧ получила главное оружие за последние годы. Учёные создали ленакапавир — препарат нового поколения для профилактики ВИЧ, который показал почти 100% эффективность в исследованиях. Вместо ежедневных таблеток — всего ДВА укола в год. Препарат уже получил одобрение для доконтактной профилактики, а ВОЗ назвала его одним из самых значимых прорывов в борьбе с вирусом. @RusskiyBis
🌐 В России упал спрос на мобильный интернет Объём мобильного трафика в 2026 году снизился на 22%. Причина — регулярные отключения сети. @RusskiyBis
👩🦰 Топ самых дорогих косметических брендов 1. 🇫🇷 Chanel. Стоимость бренда — $27,3 млрд. 2. 🇫🇷 L’Oréal. Стоимость бренда — $15,6 млрд. 3. 🇺🇸 Gillette. Стоимость бренда — $9,1 млрд. 4. 🇩🇪 Nivea. Стоимость бренда — $7,8 млрд. 5. 🇫🇷 Guerlain. Стоимость бренда — $7,7 млрд. @RusskiyBis
Налоговая ликвидировала ИП солиста группы Little Big Ильи Прусикина* По данным сервиса проверки контрагентов Rusprofile, Федеральная налоговая служба 27 июня ликвидировала ИП солиста группы Little Big Ильи Прусикина. Музыкант был зарегистрирован в качестве индивидуального предпринимателя с 2017 года с основным видом деятельности "Деятельность в области исполнительских искусств". "Исключение индивидуального предприн…
Вилла на Пхукете стоит столько же, сколько двушка на 47 квадратов в Сочи. За ₽8 млн можно купить огромный двухэтажный особняк на острове. Придется потратиться на мебель, остальные удобства уже включены в стоимость @RusskiyBis
Маркетплейсы — ВСЁ. Бренды всё чаще просят покупателей оформлять заказы напрямую через свои сайты, а не через маркетплейсы. Чтобы переманить аудиторию, предлагают скидки, подарки, эксклюзивные товары и более личный подход. Так, например, один бренд из Петербурга положил в заказ настоящие камушки с Финского залива — просто чтобы покупку хотелось запомнить. @RusskiyBis
Fresh Bar представил новую линейку Sensia – вода с витаминами и электролитами. В составе нет добавленного сахара, а калорийность составляет всего 1 ккал на 100 мл. Бренд делает ставку на растущий спрос на напитки с добавленным функционалом: в линейке появилась вода для концентрации, расслабления и красоты, а также артезианская вода Fresh Water. @RusskiyBis
Туры в Турцию и Таиланд резко подешевели — цены уже сравнивают с 2020 годом. 💸 Сейчас можно улететь почти по цене телевизора: 🟡 Аланья на двоих на 5 ночей — от 40 тысяч рублей с перелётом 🟡 Пхукет на 14 дней — от 85 тысяч рублей.
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @RusskiyBis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русский Бизнес” (@RusskiyBis), 41,769 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RusskiyBis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.