بيان إدانة واستنكار صادر عن جامعة صنعاء حول ماتعرضت له كلية الطب والعلوم الصحية بجامعة الحديدة من استهداف جوي في إطار العدوان السعودي على بلدنا.
❤18👍2

Channel
@USFYemen
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
68,113subscribers
-2,845 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001002365699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @USFYemen |
| Description | |صوت الطالب الجامعي، وصدى عنفوان الشباب| كن صوت الطالب وشاركنا بأخبار كليتك وآرائك ومقترحاتك عبر بوت الاستفسارات: https://t.me/USFsanabot |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/USFYemen |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 12 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 41 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @USF_Althagafia/1317216 Mar 2026, 16:01 UTC | @USFYemen/30642 · this entry16 Mar 2026, 16:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @USF_Althagafia/1317416 Mar 2026, 16:04 UTC | @USFYemen/30643 · this entry16 Mar 2026, 16:04 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @USF_Althagafia/1317616 Mar 2026, 20:30 UTC | @USFYemen/30645 · this entry16 Mar 2026, 20:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @USF_Althagafia/1317717 Mar 2026, 00:55 UTC | @USFYemen/30648 · this entry17 Mar 2026, 00:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @USF_Althagafia/1318529 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC | @USFYemen/31442 · this entry29 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @USFYemen/31537 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC | @USF_Althagafia/1318613 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @USF_Althagafia | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @USF_Althagafia (11–1) |
| @Coutyarms | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (7–3) |
| @Ph_tadreebUSF | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 6.5 hours | @Ph_tadreebUSF (7–2) |
| @ghmusf | 8 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @ghmusf (8–0) |
| @USF_Sareah_Law | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 6.2 hours | @USF_Sareah_Law (5–3) |
| @alharisnet | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 27 minutes | @alharisnet (6–2) |
| @AppliedMedical2024 | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 6.5 hours | @AppliedMedical2024 (5–2) |
| @courses_habilitation | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 5.9 hours | @courses_habilitation (6–1) |
| @SG_USF_A49 | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 46 minutes | this entry (6–1) |
| @USF_YEMEN | 7 (6/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @USF_YEMEN (7–0) |
| @SCfacultyofEducation | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | under a minute | even |
| @artUSF | 8 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4.9 hours | this entry (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 83 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7,836 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 December 2020 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 41, the earliest publisher we hold is @USFYemen — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 40 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:35 | 68,113 | -28 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 68,141 | -14 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:27 | 68,155 | -48 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:40 | 68,203 | -62 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 68,265 | -40 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:27 | 68,305 | -46 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 68,351 | -41 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 68,392 | -56 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:38 | 68,448 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 68,465 | -32 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:50 | 68,497 | -22 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 68,519 | -42 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 68,561 | -28 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 68,589 | -21 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 68,610 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 68,619 | -43 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 68,662 | -34 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:41 | 68,696 | -19 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 68,715 | -35 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 68,750 | first reading |
13,781 posts held, back to 22 December 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1,115 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13,781 (22 December 2020 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 281,354 |
| Reactions total | 609 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 104 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,088 reactions across 343 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,579 | 75.6% | |
| 👍 | 165 | 7.90% | |
| 🫡 | 127 | 6.08% | |
| 👏 | 98 | 4.69% | |
| 💯 | 44 | 2.11% | |
| 🎉 | 39 | 1.87% | |
| 🤩 | 36 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 919 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 April 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 92 posts held from the last 30 days (16.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
بيان إدانة واستنكار صادر عن جامعة صنعاء حول ماتعرضت له كلية الطب والعلوم الصحية بجامعة الحديدة من استهداف جوي في إطار العدوان السعودي على بلدنا.
❤18👍2
🇾🇪 أسبوع الشهيد | وفاءٌ للتضحيات واستذكارٌ للمواقف الخالدة نظّم ملتقى الطالب الجامعي بكلية الصيدلة – جامعة صنعاء، اليوم الأربعاء 4 نوفمبر 2026م، الموافق 23 جمادى الأولى 1448هـ، نزولًا ميدانيًا إلى روضة الشهداء، بمشاركة عدد من طلاب الكلية، وفاءً لتضحيات الشهداء واستذكارًا لسيرهم العطرة وما قدموه من عطاءٍ وبذلٍ وتضحية. وتضمّن النزول استحضار المواقف البطولية التي سطّرها الشهداء، وما جسّدوه من ثباتٍ وإرادةٍ وإيمانٍ راس…
❤4
🔰 كلية الشريعة والقانون – جامعة صنعاء 🔰 🎥 فلاشة من فعالية تدشين برنامج المحكمة الافتراضية التدريبي بكلية الشريعة والقانون، للعام الجامعي 1448هـ. #اللجنة_الإعلامية_بالكلية #كلية_الشريعة_والقانون #ملتقى_الطالب_الجامعي #جامعة_صنعاء https://t.me/Rights_Y
❤3
نُظم ملتقى الطالب الجامعي في كلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية - جامعة صنعاء، نزولًا ميدانيًا مهيبًا إلى روضة الشهداء، يوم الأربعاء الموافق 24 جمادى الأولى 1448هـ - 4 نوفمبر 2026م، بمشاركة طالبات كلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية، وذلك استجابةً لدعوة كريمة من عمادة الكلية وملتقى الطالب الجامعي بالكلية. كانت زيارة تحمل في طياتها أسمى معاني الوفاء، وتجسد لحظة صدقٍ لاستشعار عظمة الشهادة وسمو التضحية. لقد جسد هذا النزول رسالة …
❤3🫡1
في صباحٍ تزين بالوفاء، وقلوبٍ يملؤها الاعتزاز،انطلقت طالبات كلية العلوم - جامعة صنعاء، في نزولٍ ميداني إلى روضة الشهداء، يوم الأربعاء الموافق 4 نوفمبر 2026م، ضمن الأنشطة الثقافية والتوعوية التي ينظمها ملتقى الطالب الجامعي بكلية العلوم. كانت الزيارة وفاءً لتضحيات الشهداء، واستذكارًا لمواقفهم العظيمة التي سطّروها بدمائهم الطاهرة في سبيل الوطن. ولم يكن هذا النزول حدثًا عابرًا، بل حلقةً مضيئة في مسيرة الأنشطة والبرامج …
❤2👍2🫡1
نظم ملتقى الطالب الجامعي في كلية الصيدلة - جامعة صنعاء، نزولًا ميدانيًا إلى روضة الشهداء، يوم الأربعاء الموافق 24 جمادى الأولى 1448هـ - 4 نوفمبر 2026م، في تمام الساعة العاشرة صباحًا، بمشاركة نخبة من طلاب كلية الصيدلة، وذلك استجابةً لدعوة كريمة من عمادة كلية الصيدلة وملتقى الطالب الجامعي بالكلية. لم تكن زيارةً عابرة، بل كانت وقفة وفاء، ومحطة تأمل، ولحظة استشعار لعظمة الشهادة.. هناك، حيث ترقد أجساد قدّمت أرواحها فداءً…
❤10🫡1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
عمادة كلية الحاسوب وتكنولوجيا المعلومات، بالتنسيق مع ملتقى الطالب الجامعي بجامعة صنعاء، تنفذ نزولاً ميدانيا بمشاركة طلاب الكلية لزيارة روضات الشهداء، استذكاراً لتضحياتهم ومواقفهم #جامعة_صنعاء #كلية_الحاسوب_وتكنولوجيا_المعلومات #ملتقى_الطالب_الجامعي #يوم_الشهيد #شهداؤنا_عظماؤنا #اللجنة_الاعلامية_بكلية_الحاسوب
🫡3
عمادة كلية الحاسوب وتكنولوجيا المعلومات، بالتنسيق مع ملتقى الطالب الجامعي بجامعة صنعاء، تنفذ نزولاً ميدانياً بمشاركة طلاب الكلية لزيارة روضات الشهداء، استذكاراً لتضحياتهم ومواقفهم العظيمة، وتجديداً للعهد والوفاء لمن بذلوا أرواحهم في سبيل الله والوطن. #جامعة_صنعاء #كلية_الحاسوب_وتكنولوجيا_المعلومات #ملتقى_الطالب_الجامعي #يوم_الشهيد #شهداؤنا_عظماؤنا
👏3
وقفة بجامعة صنعاء تنديداً باستهداف العدو السعودي كلية الطب بجامعة الحديدة #القناة_التعليمية https://t.me/YemenEducationTV2025
❤3
جامعة صنعاء - افتتاح برنامج المحكمة الافتراضية في كلية الشريعة #القناة_التعليمية https://t.me/YemenEducationTV2025
جامعة صنعاء .. وقفة تنديداً باستهداف العدو السعودي كلية الطب بجامعة الحديدة #قناة_عدن #نشرة_الأخبار_الرئيسية 23جماد أول 1448هـ - 3 نوفمبر 2026م #شاهد 👇 #قناة_عدن_الفضائية https://t.me/adentv20
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 13,781 posts we hold for @USFYemen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@USFYemen edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 11 posts on @USFYemen as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 68 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@USFYemen named 44 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
22 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
1 of 22 shown as text only, not a link. The exact host, not merely a domain it shares a registrable root with, matches a threat-intelligence blocklist this register already checks elsewhere (see methodology) — the link still appearing in a post is still a measured fact and is still shown, but no anchor is rendered here, so no click and no link equity passes to it from this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جامعة صنعاء | USF” (@USFYemen), 68,113 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USFYemen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.