Закулисье российской политики. 15 лет корреспондент Кремлёвского пула
Для связи: @Y_vopros
Регистрация в перечне РКН: gosuslugi.ru/snet/673488b1714e072e37877ef1
Created
24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +354. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,248–31,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 05:58
31,853
-24
15 Sept 2026, 06:58
31,877
-4
13 Sept 2026, 15:02
31,881
-6
8 Sept 2026, 22:58
31,887
+111
5 Sept 2026, 16:40
31,776
+1
3 Sept 2026, 20:19
31,775
-2
2 Sept 2026, 13:47
31,777
+31
1 Sept 2026, 13:08
31,746
+7
31 Aug 2026, 13:12
31,739
+63
30 Aug 2026, 13:03
31,676
+26
29 Aug 2026, 13:14
31,650
+5
28 Aug 2026, 16:42
31,645
-5
27 Aug 2026, 14:38
31,650
+7
26 Aug 2026, 11:22
31,643
+299
25 Aug 2026, 08:22
31,344
-9
24 Aug 2026, 10:35
31,353
-8
22 Aug 2026, 21:04
31,361
-17
21 Aug 2026, 12:13
31,378
+2
20 Aug 2026, 11:28
31,376
+5
19 Aug 2026, 14:24
31,371
first reading
Engagement
190 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.3%
avg views ÷ 31,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,900
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.191%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
108
of 190 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
190 (2 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
2,040,860
Reactions total
3,890
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,900
Videos
≈2,760
Links
≈92,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 83 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,149 reactions across 187 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,517
21.2%
👍
1,288
18.0%
❤
1,180
16.5%
👎
1,142
16.0%
🔥
899
12.6%
🤔
544
7.61%
👏
320
4.48%
🤯
93
1.30%
🥰
74
1.04%
🤩
71
0.993%
😱
21
0.294%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 190 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 190 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Yunashev_Live. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 190 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Спросил у Дмитрия Пескова, ожидать ли нам перестановок в правительстве.
Такие слухи возникают регулярно, но в этот раз есть достаточно логичная причина.
Сразу несколько членов кабмина прошли на выборах в Госдуму.
Сергей Лавров - по федеральному списку.
Юрий Трутнев и Виталий Савельев — по списку Дальнего Востока и Московской области соответственно.
Тут вспоминается, как Трутнев сказал мне, что его выдвижение - это "…
Большая часть недели уже позади, и осталось только два дня до выходных. Надеюсь, на этой неделе они коснутся и меня. Вспоминаем главное за сегодня и идем отдыхать.
▪️Владимир Путин провел совещание с членами правительства. Чиновники докладывали президенту о текущем положении дел в их зоне ответственности: о результатах Международного фестиваля молодежи, о работе по переезду головных офисов госкомпаний в регионы, о в…
Мария Захарова опубликовала первое фото со встречи Лаврова и Рубио в Нью-Йорке.
Глава госдепартамента США улыбается. Видимо, ещё не считал куда более серьёзный настрой Сергея Викторовича.
Юнашев LIVE теперь и в МАХ
💬 Задать вопрос
Песков высказался о перспективах встречи Путина с Трампом и Зеленским.
- Готовность президентов России и США есть. Они в своих телефонных разговорах подчеркивают готовность при необходимости провести такую встречу. Что касается Зеленского, то он все еще может приехать в Москву. Гарантии безопасности ему будут предоставлены, - заверил пресс-секретарь президента.
Однако пока что о встречах на высшем уровне "конкрети…
Ну что, все посмеялись над мимикой Зеленского во время совместного заявления с Трампом? Как в первый раз, право слово.
А теперь давайте к смыслам — про них я написал вот здесь.
Юнашев LIVE теперь и в МАХ
💬 Задать вопрос
Вторник позади, но ощущение, что вся новостная повестка либо отходит от дней выборов, либо уже замерла в ожидании информации из Нью-Йорка (об этом ниже). В любом случае, подводим традиционные итоги дня:
▪️Владимир Путин провел телефонный разговор с наследным принцем и председателем Совета министров Саудовской Аравии. Также рабочий день президента включал в себя встречу с председателем правления Сбербанка Германом Гр…
В Кремле заявили о необходимости реформирования ООН.
Дмитрий Песков рассказал о том, как в Москве видят изменения, которым должна подвергнуться организация для успешной работы.
- Постоянное членство должно быть расширено в обязательном порядке. Появилось много государств и межгосударственных образований, которые, безусловно, должны иметь свой голос в Совбезе, - уверен пресс-секретарь президента.
Однако со звучащим…
Такую важную персону, прибывшую аж в Нью-Йорк для участия в целой Генеральной Ассамблее ООН, вновь почему-то встречают только "свои" – представитель Украины при ООН и поверенный в делах страны в США.
Юнашев LIVE теперь и в МАХ
💬 Задать вопрос
Интересное про работу пресс-служб президентов США и РФ.
Сейчас у Трампа затяжной конфликт с моими американскими коллегами. Он закрыл некоторым СМИ доступ в Белый дом, и они мстят - например, на последнем подходе президенту не поставили микрофон и не повесили петличку, поэтому никто не услышит, о чем он вещал (впрочем, сомневаюсь, что там было что-то жутко важное).
У нас же техническим обеспечением трансляций и подх…
Подводим итоги понедельника в дайджесте — новостей не так много, основной фокус внимания сосредоточен на минувших выборах.
▪️ЦИК подвел итоги обработки 97,37% протоколов на выборах в Госдуму. Окончательный результат будет объявлен только 25 сентября, после рассмотрения всех жалоб и обращений. Но уже сейчас понятно, что лидером ожидаемо стала «Единая Россия» - 57,96% голосов. КПРФ — 13,67%, ЛДПР — 8,96%, «Новые люди»…
"Несчастлив игрой, да счастлив женой!"
Сегодня бы исполнилось 90 лет бывшему мэру Москвы Юрию Лужкову.
При всей неоднозначности его фигуры он был не просто градоначальником — он был политиком старой формации и большого влияния. Знаю о случаях, когда иностранные коллеги были вынуждены выбирать: присутствовать на мероприятии с Лужковым или с главой иностранного государства, который в те же дни посещал их город. Как п…
👏28❤20👎5🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @Yunashev_Live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 61 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Yunashev_Live named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@rgrunews named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 27 posts, 8 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
@rian_ru named in 4 posts, 18 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мэр Москвы Сергей Собянин @mos_sobyanin · 362,973#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Образ жизни @rflifestyle · 38,537 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юнашев LIVE” (@Yunashev_Live), 31,853 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yunashev_Live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.