What did Trump ask? He reportedly said, “How does it feel being a loser?” BullCast

Channel
BullCast
@bullcast4
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
53,643subscribers
+16,075 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002620688291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bullcast4 |
| Description | Your go-to podcast for bullish crypto discussions, expert interviews, and market analysis. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bullcast4 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:21 | 53,643 | +166 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 53,477 | +537 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:48 | 52,940 | +148 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:15 | 52,792 | +51 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 52,741 | +15 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:47 | 52,726 | +99 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 52,627 | +135 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 52,492 | -341 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 52,833 | -155 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 52,988 | -45 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 53,033 | -59 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 53,092 | -72 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 53,164 | +102 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:45 | 53,062 | +75 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 52,987 | +655 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 52,332 | -520 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 52,852 | -345 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:48 | 53,197 | +401 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:35 | 52,796 | -65 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:34 | 52,861 | first reading |
Engagement
1,408 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.53%
- avg views ÷ 53,643 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,430
- 727 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.431%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 727
- of 1,408 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 677 of 727 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,408 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,765,353 |
| Reactions total | 7,404 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,180
- Videos
- ≈218
- Links
- ≈5,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 11m 09s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 58 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,292 reactions across 948 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.25% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 645 | 5.25% | |
| 🌭 | 376 | 3.06% | |
| 🔥 | 364 | 2.96% | |
| 👌 | 357 | 2.90% | |
| 🎉 | 356 | 2.90% | |
| 😇 | 352 | 2.86% | |
| 👍 | 348 | 2.83% | |
| 🤓 | 346 | 2.81% | |
| 🤩 | 346 | 2.81% | |
| 🍌 | 332 | 2.70% | |
| 😁 | 329 | 2.68% | |
| 😍 | 322 | 2.62% | |
| 🎄 | 320 | 2.60% | |
| 👏 | 315 | 2.56% | |
| 😎 | 310 | 2.52% | |
| 🏆 | 305 | 2.48% | |
| 🙏 | 300 | 2.44% | |
| 🥰 | 292 | 2.38% | |
| ⚡ | 289 | 2.35% | |
| 🎃 | 285 | 2.32% | |
| 34 further kinds | 5,403 | 44.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 948 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.00%
- 20 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 1,120
- over 20 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 2,220
- over 980 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 727 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
30% deposit bonus at BTCC. Available to users in the CIS and elsewhere. US users may use the platform where licensed. 🎁 BTCC MEXC offers API trading and low fees. US users are prohibited. MEXC LBank offers a 15% sign-up bonus. LBank Discounted Trezor cold wallet. Code GA4XTT at checkout. Trezor AutoSignal.ai provides crypto signals and trading automation. AutoSignal.ai BullCast
👏1
🍏 How many apps already support the iPhone Duo? More than 100,000, Apple says, with thousands more joining every day. BullCast
2 statements from MEXC: Operations are continuing as usual, and user assets remain secure. The exchange also said it plans to engage in constructive dialogue with FinCEN and other relevant regulatory and supervisory authorities worldwide. BullCast
📸 Too much noise, not enough signal? Get the crypto picture — fast, clear, and straight to the point. ⚡️ @cryptobrief7 — Crypto Snapshot delivers: • Daily market briefs in under 60 seconds • Token launches, alt pumps, trend reversals • Real-time snapshots of Bitcoin, ETH & DeFi action • No fluff. Just fast alpha. 🧠 Perfect for traders, analysts & crypto addicts on the go. 👉 Open. Scan. Profit. #ad #sponosred
🦄3⚡2🌭2😴1
Has Bitdeer sold all its Bitcoin? The exchange has dumped 100% of its holdings. BullCast
😇4🍓1🐳1
Can French Binance users still access their funds? Withdrawals remain available, but deposits have been frozen for all users in France. BullCast
😎2
Did the crypto industry miss its best chance to secure market structure legislation? Former House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry says it did, arguing that the industry let an important opportunity to establish a regulatory framework slip away. BullCast
💯6😘6❤3🍌3🏆3🍓2🍾2👌2
What did Hyperliquid do in the past 24 hours? It bought back and burned about 21,040 HYPE tokens, worth roughly $1.64 million, according to OnchainLens. Those tokens won’t be making a comeback. BullCast
😨8🥰6😐4😘4🎉3👍3👻3🤝2
Sahil has accused Caitlyn Jenner and Clavicular of running crypto scams, adding cryptocurrency to the list of alleged schemes. BullCast
🤣7🦄3😁2😇2❤1🍾1👀1🔥1
Ansem exposed as a scammer KOL accused of stealing from followers. BullCast
😎3🗿2😴2⚡1🌭1🎃1💯1🥰1
A ceasefire agreement and a nuclear deal with Iran could be signed by Sunday, with JD Vance expected to sign them. BullCast
🤓1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,408 posts we hold for @bullcast4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 13 posts on @bullcast4 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 21 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 31 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@venompulse8 · 72,61510 postsDegen gems
@powcalls · 77,7387 postsCrypto Snapshot
@cryptobrief7 · 54,0655 postsRocketFuel Crypto
@moonfuel_crypto · 66,1034 postsBull Market Digest
@bullbrief · 57,9413 postsCoin Core
@coincore_news · 64,7543 postsCrypto Ignition
@cryptofuse7 · 56,3713 postsBull pulse
@bullpulse8 · 58,9502 postsCrypto Flash
@tokenspark3 · 62,4352 postsBit Brilliance
@lambosignal_news · 58,0061 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@cryptobrief7 · 54,0658 postsVenom Pulse
@venompulse8 · 72,6156 postsCrypto Ignition
@cryptofuse7 · 56,3715 postsCoin Core
@coincore_news · 64,7544 postsCRYPTO NEWS
@cryptocurrency_media · 63,6774 postsBit Brilliance
@lambosignal_news · 58,0064 postsCrypto Flash
@tokenspark3 · 62,4354 postsRocketFuel Crypto
@moonfuel_crypto · 66,1033 postsTelegram News
@telegram · 9,177,9083 postsBull Market Digest
@bullbrief · 57,9412 postsBull pulse
@bullpulse8 · 58,9502 postsDegen gems
@powcalls · 77,7382 postsPavel Durov
@durov · 10,108,8881 postquantnetwork
@quantnetwork · 121 postQuantumAnalyst
@QuantumAnalyst · 1551 postRipple - XRP
@Ripple · 15,7191 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BullCast” (@bullcast4), 53,643 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bullcast4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.