Strategy acquired 950 Bitcoin for $75.7 million at an average price of $79,670. Its total Bitcoin holdings now stand at 846,000 BTC. Bull pulse
👻16🍾12💯11🔥10🤗8🤓7😁7😱7

Channel
@bullpulse8
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
39,722subscribers
+2,257 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002661501397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bullpulse8 |
| Description | Dive into bullish crypto insights driven by honest market observations! 🚀 Uncover hidden gems and capitalize on trends with exclusive, fearless opinions. 🔥 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bullpulse8 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
21,500 average views per post against 39,722 subscribers — an engagement rate of 54.1%. Across the 3,655 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,635–99,947 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.75% and 11.1%, with a median of 5.17%.
| Window | 30 days (23 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 71 of 71 published in the window (0 exact, 71 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,524,810 |
| Mature posts only | 56.2% over 65 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 39,722 measured 18 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:eng · 3,655 channels · p10 0.429% · p25 1.75% · p50 5.17% · p75 11.1% · p90 21.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.316th percentile · 10.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.074% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 39,722 | +1,149 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 38,573 | +79 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 38,494 | -210 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 38,704 | -144 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 38,848 | +102 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 38,746 | +67 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 38,679 | +106 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 38,573 | +20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 38,553 | +20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:26 | 38,533 | +58 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 38,475 | +30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 38,445 | +69 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 38,376 | +49 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 38,327 | +67 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 38,260 | +24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 38,236 | +41 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 38,195 | +19 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 38,176 | +19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 38,157 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 38,158 | first reading |
122 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 122 (1 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,524,810 |
| Reactions total | 8,627 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13,798 reactions across 122 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.27% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 727 | 5.27% | |
| 💯 | 476 | 3.45% | |
| 😍 | 471 | 3.41% | |
| 🤗 | 458 | 3.32% | |
| 🎃 | 451 | 3.27% | |
| 👍 | 436 | 3.16% | |
| 💋 | 412 | 2.99% | |
| 🔥 | 395 | 2.86% | |
| 🤓 | 395 | 2.86% | |
| 🤩 | 394 | 2.86% | |
| 👏 | 392 | 2.84% | |
| 😘 | 366 | 2.65% | |
| 🌭 | 351 | 2.54% | |
| 🎉 | 351 | 2.54% | |
| 👌 | 343 | 2.49% | |
| 🦄 | 334 | 2.42% | |
| 😁 | 333 | 2.41% | |
| 😎 | 330 | 2.39% | |
| 😇 | 312 | 2.26% | |
| 🎄 | 309 | 2.24% | |
| 34 further kinds | 5,762 | 41.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 122 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,798 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Strategy acquired 950 Bitcoin for $75.7 million at an average price of $79,670. Its total Bitcoin holdings now stand at 846,000 BTC. Bull pulse
👻16🍾12💯11🔥10🤗8🤓7😁7😱7
🔖🔖⬜️🔖 above $83,800 Bull pulse
😎15🌭10👍10🎉9👌8👏8😱7🏆6
⚡️ ZetaChain holders have voted to discontinue its Layer 1 blockchain and transition ZETA to Solana, as the team redirects its efforts toward Anuma, a private AI application. Bull pulse
🤩13🍌11🐳10😱10👌7🤔7👏6🔥6
🔖🔖⬜️🔖 above $80,217 Bull pulse
🔥39⚡34🌭31👌25🎃23🎄22💯21🤮21
⚪️ SEC revealed a new innovation exemption designed to modernize America’s capital markets Bull pulse
❤36🥰32🗿30👏28😍26😎25🤗24💯23
📢 JPMorgan acknowledges the CLARITY Act isn't “entirely off the table,” but stresses its odds of passing this year are still “extremely slim.” Bull pulse
🤓42🤩31😇29🥰27🌚25⚡23🎉21🎄20
🔷 Vitalik Buterin has highlighted Ethereum’s push toward AI-assisted verification of full software programs, a move aimed at strengthening overall system security. He emphasized that developers should go beyond just securing critical code—verification should extend to every layer, including databases, networking, and caching systems. Bull pulse
🎄27🍓22😍19🌭17⚡16❤16🤓15🎃14
📈 FOMC hikes rates by 25 basis points to a range of 3.75%–4% The Fed says this move is intended to accelerate progress toward its 2% inflation target. All 12 FOMC members voted in favor. Most officials expect rates to settle at 4.1% by the end of 2026, while the median estimate for the longer-term neutral rate has been raised to 3.2%. Bull pulse
🐳23🔥22🤝20👏18😘17👎16😍16🌚15
⚡️ Circle has launched Arc mainnet, its new Layer 1 blockchain built specifically for financial markets and the AI agent economy, with BlackRock, Visa, Mastercard, and DTCC as founding validators. Bull pulse
🎉23🌭22🎃19🖕19🥰18❤16👏15😍15
⚡️ Deutsche Bank will launch Bitcoin and cryptocurrency custody services for institutional clients later this year. Bull pulse
🤔20🌭13😍13👌12😢12👍11👎10😘10
⚡️ X has rolled out its Cashtag Partner Program in the US, enabling users to buy stocks, ETFs, and crypto directly through connected brokerages such as Gemini, Kraken, and Coinbase. Bull pulse
🍾14🤣14🙈12🎃11🤩11🦄11😍11🤝9
📢 Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called the Senate's failure to move forward with the Clarity Act "disappointing," but remains confident that regulatory clarity for crypto will eventually arrive. He emphasized that both the SEC and CFTC already have the tools needed to create clearer rules for the industry. Learn more Bull pulse
😎9😨8🤓7🍾6💔6✍5💋5🤗5
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @bullpulse8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bullpulse8 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bull pulse” (@bullpulse8), 39,722 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bullpulse8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.