JUST IN: U.S. 🇺🇸 Bitcoin ETFs saw $986.8 million in inflow this week 🚀 Source: https://x.com/bitcoinmagazine/status/2096292784516817257 SatoshiSlice
🎄10🤣7🙏6🍌5🦄5😭5🙈5🎃4

Channel
@orangesats3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37,114subscribers
+1,198 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002509785327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orangesats3 |
| Description | Microperspectives on Bitcoin, from sats to big trends — orange-pilled content that cuts deep. 🍊🔥 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orangesats3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 37,114 | +35 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 37,079 | +46 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:33 | 37,033 | +22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 37,011 | +24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 36,987 | +43 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 36,944 | +73 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 36,871 | +51 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 36,820 | +17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 36,803 | +72 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 36,731 | +27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 36,704 | +44 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 36,660 | +11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 36,649 | +25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 36,624 | +29 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 36,595 | +30 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 36,565 | -18 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 36,583 | +64 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 36,519 | +136 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 36,383 | +94 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 36,289 | first reading |
236 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 236 (5 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,930,700 |
| Reactions total | 8,124 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 15:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 62 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,292 reactions across 236 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.15% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 479 | 5.15% | |
| ⚡ | 282 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 281 | 3.02% | |
| 🤓 | 277 | 2.98% | |
| 🍓 | 276 | 2.97% | |
| 😎 | 258 | 2.78% | |
| 👏 | 254 | 2.73% | |
| 😘 | 253 | 2.72% | |
| 🌭 | 252 | 2.71% | |
| 🤣 | 251 | 2.70% | |
| 🎃 | 250 | 2.69% | |
| 🙏 | 239 | 2.57% | |
| 😍 | 238 | 2.56% | |
| 🤗 | 238 | 2.56% | |
| 🔥 | 234 | 2.52% | |
| 🤷 | 234 | 2.52% | |
| 🍾 | 231 | 2.49% | |
| 💯 | 229 | 2.46% | |
| 🦄 | 229 | 2.46% | |
| 🏆 | 225 | 2.42% | |
| 34 further kinds | 4,082 | 43.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 236 of the 236 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
JUST IN: U.S. 🇺🇸 Bitcoin ETFs saw $986.8 million in inflow this week 🚀 Source: https://x.com/bitcoinmagazine/status/2096292784516817257 SatoshiSlice
🎄10🤣7🙏6🍌5🦄5😭5🙈5🎃4
BULLISH: 🟠 On-chain analysis of Bitcoin holders currently suggests today "is similar to the 2023 breakout that sent bitcoin from $20k to $125k", Unchained Capital reports. 👀 "For the first time since the ATH, short-term holders have positions that are meaningfully in profit" 🚀 Source: https://x.com/bitcoinmagazine/status/2095980352971915596 SatoshiSlice
🍓16💋13🤝13💔12🔥11😱11🤷10😡10
Follow Bitcoin without the noise. 📣 https://x.com/BTCTimescom SatoshiSlice
💯13😭12👏11💔10👌9❤8🏆7😍7
NEW: 🇬🇧 U.K.'s largest investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown is now offering Bitcoin products to 2 million clients! 👏 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2095952167139991916 SatoshiSlice
💩9🌭8🦄8🙏8🎃6👀6👏6🤝6
JUST IN: 🇸🇬 Singapore public company BitFuFu disclosed adding 59 Bitcoin, raising their total holdings to 1,373 BTC worth $108.4 million 🚀 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2095929081472733300 SatoshiSlice
👏9😎8😴8🤮6😁6🔥5🤬5🤷5
BLACKROCK: 🟠 Government debt and monetary debasement are driving Bitcoin’s rally. 👀 BTC has historically performed well under these conditions. - Robbie Mitchnick, Head of Digital Assets. Source: https://x.com/BitcoinArchive/status/2095916486594339028 SatoshiSlice
❤11👻9🥰9🙏8😍7🍓5🏆5🐳5
JUST IN: 🟠 $1T Fidelity International says Bitcoin could "just soar" as macro risks escalate. 👀 Calls BTC an "insurance policy." Source: https://x.com/BitcoinArchive/status/2095872491579163043 SatoshiSlice
🦄8🙏7🖕6🤗6❤5⚡4✍4🤷4
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Major U.S. law enforcement organization National Sheriffs’ Association no longer opposes The Clarity Act 👀 “We believe the most appropriate course is to step back and allow the legislative process to proceed to establish a… much needed regulatory framework.” Source: https://x.com/bitcoinmagazine/status/2095813271991333031 SatoshiSlice
⚡10🤷8🔥7🙉6✍4🦄3👍1💋1
JUST IN: 🟠 Bitcoin has experienced its shallowest bear market in its history, Galaxy Research reports 🚀 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2095622205216587991 SatoshiSlice
🤝11😇10🍌7🏆7🙉6👏5🍓4🐳4
JUST IN: 🟠 Bitcoin's correlation with gold hit a six-year high, according to Bitwise 👀 "The last time it was this high was 2020, after the Covid stimulus." 🚀 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2095597794119533007 SatoshiSlice
🎄13🦄13😍8🤷5😈5🐳4👍4💯4
JUST IN: 🟠 World's largest prediction market Polymarket.com launches perpetual Bitcoin futures trading with up to 20x leverage 🚀 Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2095552824016785504 SatoshiSlice
🏆13🤩10🌭7🤗5🤣5😈5😎5👍3
BREAKING🚨: U.S. Treasury is scheduled to buy back $12.5 Billion of their own debt today. Source: https://x.com/SimplyBitcoin/status/2095537274247119065 SatoshiSlice
😴8❤7🎃6👌6😍4🙏4⚡3🖕3
Showing the 12 most recent of 236 posts we hold for @orangesats3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SatoshiSlice” (@orangesats3), 37,114 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orangesats3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.