Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RocketFuel Crypto

Channel

RocketFuel Crypto

@moonfuel_crypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39,723subscribers

+814 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002655790090
TypeChannel
Username@moonfuel_crypto
DescriptionStay ahead with unbiased market news on Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT, Fintech, Web3, DeFi & Blockchain! 🚀✨
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/moonfuel_crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,90939,91539,4128 August 2026 — 38,909 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,909 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,951 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,999 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,150 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,225 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,337 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39,468 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,542 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,547 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,524 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,528 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,553 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,587 subscribers22 August 2026 — 39,571 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,648 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,699 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,729 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,730 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,825 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,831 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,876 subscribers1 September 2026 — 39,875 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,912 subscribers3 September 2026 — 39,915 subscribers5 September 2026 — 39,907 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39,723 subscribers39,7238 August 20268 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 31 days, net +814. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,758–40,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 21:5739,723-184
5 Sept 2026, 13:0139,907-8
3 Sept 2026, 15:5539,915+3
2 Sept 2026, 09:4339,912+37
1 Sept 2026, 11:3439,875-1
30 Aug 2026, 09:3339,876+45
29 Aug 2026, 08:3539,831+6
28 Aug 2026, 09:3839,825+95
27 Aug 2026, 06:3439,730+1
26 Aug 2026, 04:5839,729+30
25 Aug 2026, 06:0539,699+51
24 Aug 2026, 07:2839,648+77
22 Aug 2026, 17:5739,571-16
21 Aug 2026, 11:1739,587+34
20 Aug 2026, 11:0839,553+25
19 Aug 2026, 10:5739,528+4
18 Aug 2026, 11:3839,524-23
17 Aug 2026, 12:0339,547+5
16 Aug 2026, 03:3439,542+74
14 Aug 2026, 13:1839,468first reading

Engagement

545 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 39,723 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,210
525 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.398%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
525
of 545 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 513 of 525 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held545 (4 August 202610 September 2026)
Views total2,211,623
Reactions total8,776
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
600
Videos
32
Links
8,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 11s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,385 reactions across 532 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 6.41% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7306.41%
👏4113.61%
🤓3673.22%
🎄3362.95%
🔥3242.85%
😇3152.77%
😁3132.75%
🤗3072.70%
🎉2992.63%
🐳2862.51%
🙏2862.51%
👍2802.46%
🍾2792.45%
😴2792.45%
🤣2722.39%
🎃2642.32%
👌2642.32%
🍌2632.31%
💯2632.31%
🤩2552.24%
34 further kinds4,99243.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 533 of the 545 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 545 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.83%
10 of 545 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
4,040
over 10 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,510
over 535 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 545 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC21 viewsread 10 September 2026

Scientists cut quantum resource requirements in half for a crucial operation targeting Bitcoin and Ethereum RocketFuel Crypto

10 Sept 2026, 12:59 UTC216 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

⚠️ BREAKING: Solana falls below $100.00 #sol RocketFuel Crypto

🔥1

10 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC370 views3 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Markets are pricing in a 25bps rate hike Expect more selling pressure ahead RocketFuel Crypto

🌭2🔥1

10 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC484 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

MARKETS WORLDWIDE ARE PLUNGING RocketFuel Crypto

💋1

10 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,100 views5 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Telegram Bans Premium Usernames Telegram has suspended a large number of premium usernames, including @aaaa, @bbbb, @cccc, @dddd, and many others. The collective value of these usernames is estimated in the tens of millions. This action follows a U.S. Department of Justice move to freeze over $52 million in cryptocurrency linked to Xinbi Guarantee — the owner of the accounts and a Chinese-based Telegram ma

🥰5

10 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,140 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

NEW: ⚠️ The UN's nuclear watchdog warns it's losing oversight continuity over Iran's nuclear activities. RocketFuel Crypto

🏆1😡1

10 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 10 September 2026

An HMRC official has been fired after being caught on camera admitting he provided false information to non-white callers seeking advice, in an attempt to undermine them. The tax authority is now taking formal action with the aim of prosecuting the former employee. RocketFuel Crypto

😁5

10 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,170 views4 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Iran slashes fees for vessel port calls RocketFuel Crypto

🎉4

10 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,130 views3 reactionsread 10 September 2026

YEMEN’S HOUTHIS CAPTURE MOKHA AND ITS PORT – NYT RocketFuel Crypto

👏3

10 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,140 views3 reactionsread 10 September 2026

Wow Bloomberg, showing up ten minutes late—we’d already moved on. RocketFuel Crypto

🤝2😎1

10 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,220 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026

NEW: 🏦 Nasdaq backs Payward, Kraken’s parent company, at a $21 billion valuation. RocketFuel Crypto

🤗2

Showing the 12 most recent of 545 posts we hold for @moonfuel_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RocketFuel Crypto” (@moonfuel_crypto), 39,723 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonfuel_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.