Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Beautiful Mind

Channel

Beautiful Mind

@calmlife

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,282subscribers

+504 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001037586826
TypeChannel
Username@calmlife
Created26 February 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/calmlife

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,77814,28214,0305 August 2026 — 13,778 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,778 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,852 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,841 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,820 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,815 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,794 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,946 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,968 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,954 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,944 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,932 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,921 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,073 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,051 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,022 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,005 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,990 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,082 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,088 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,073 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,051 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,042 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,032 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,021 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,159 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,160 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,103 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,213 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,282 subscribers5 August 202613 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 39 days, net +504. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,702–14,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 10:2014,282+69
11 Sept 2026, 12:1814,213+110
8 Sept 2026, 16:5814,103-57
5 Sept 2026, 11:0014,160+1
3 Sept 2026, 10:2614,159+138
2 Sept 2026, 05:2314,021-11
1 Sept 2026, 08:4314,032-10
31 Aug 2026, 07:1214,042-9
30 Aug 2026, 06:5814,051-22
29 Aug 2026, 05:5414,073-15
28 Aug 2026, 07:2414,088+6
27 Aug 2026, 09:1214,082+92
26 Aug 2026, 06:0913,990-15
25 Aug 2026, 03:5514,005-17
24 Aug 2026, 00:2514,022-29
22 Aug 2026, 08:5414,051-22
20 Aug 2026, 20:1514,073+152
19 Aug 2026, 18:0613,921-11
18 Aug 2026, 18:2713,932-12
17 Aug 2026, 18:1813,944first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.69%
avg views ÷ 14,282 subscribers
Avg views / post
956
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held58 (25 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total23,894
Reactions total342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

992 reactions across 57 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍50851.2%
32933.2%
👏727.26%
💔424.23%
👌292.92%
👎90.907%
🤔30.302%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 992 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:29 UTC56 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @tabadolat_kahkeshean

💯 بانک جامع برترین کانال های تلگرام؛ ⭐ دیگر لازم نیست، برای خرید کتاب پولی پرداخت کنید، اینجا تمام منابع رایگان در اختیار شماست.✉️

2 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC491 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

در سیاره کوچک ما عقاید بیش از طاعون و زلزله موجب بلایا شده است. فرانسوا ولتر 🌿 @Calmlife

👍51👌1

1 Sept 2026, 11:56 UTC438 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

انسان محکوم به آزادی است یعنی ما نمی‌توانیم از انتخاب کردن فرار کنیم. حتی انتخاب نکردن هم، خودش نوعی انتخاب است. و اینجاست که آزادی سنگین می‌شود. چون هر انتخاب، امکان‌های دیگری را از بین می‌برد. و هر تصمیم، مسئولیتِ آنچه می‌شوی را بیشتر بر دوش خودت می‌گذارد. شاید به همین دلیل است که انسان گاهی از آزادی فرار می‌کند! ترجیح می‌دهد کسی به او بگوید چه کسی باشد، چه بخواهد، چگونه زندگی کند، چه چیزی درست است و چه چیزی غلط

6👍2

31 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC566 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ثبات، کلاهی است که زندگی گاهی بر سر ما می‌گذارد! ما به ثبات عادت می‌کنیم. صبح از خواب بیدار می‌شویم، سر کار می‌رویم، پول درمی‌آوریم، برای فردا برنامه می‌ریزیم، با آدم‌هایی که دوستشان داریم حرف می‌زنیم و کم‌کم به این توهم می‌رسیم که فردا هم تقریباً شبیه امروز خواهد بود. اما چه چیزی به ما چنین قولی داده است؟ زندگی هیچ قراردادی برای ادامه‌ی وضع موجود با ما امضا نکرده است. ممکن است سال‌ها شغل داشته باشی و یک روز نداشته

👍84

30 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC584 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🔺 یک برنامه برای همه زبان‌آموزها؟ من بهش اعتقادی ندارم. چرا؟ - چون یک نفر Fast Learner هست، یکی با سرعت کمتری یاد می‌گیره - یکی با دیدن بهتر یاد می‌گیره - یکی با شنیدن و تمرین کردن یکی در Speaking قویه اما Vocabulary ضعیف‌تری داره، یکی برعکس. 🔷 پس چرا باید همه با یک برنامه پیش برن؟ در کلاس‌های من بعد از تعیین سطح برنامه‌ی هر زبان‌آموز متناسب با سطح، هدف، نقاط ضعف و سرعت یادگیری خودش طراحی می‌شه. روی Speaking، List

4👍1

30 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC594 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

چگونه می‌توان کسی را ترساند که شکمش فریاد گرسنگی می‌کشد و روده‌های بچه‌هایش از نخوردن به پیچ و تاب در می‌آید؟ دیگر چیزی نمی‌تواند او را بترساند. او بدترین ترسها را دیده است... خوشه‌های خشم جان اشتاین بک 🌿 @Calmlife

👍7💔62

29 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC783 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

وقتی مرتکب جنایت شدند، عدل و داد را اختراع کردند و برای حفظ عدل و داد، کتاب‌های قطور قانون نوشتند و برای اجرای این قوانین، گیوتین به پا کردند. فئودور داستایِوسکی از کتاب رویای آدم مضحک‌ 🌿 @Calmlife

12

29 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC917 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

‌ خواندن بی‌اندیشە بیهودە است و اندیشەی بدون خواندن خطرناک. کنفوسیوس 🌿 @Calmlife

13👍3

28 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC882 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026

مرگ و زندگی شاید ترس ما از مرگ، فقط ترس از «نبودن» نباشد. شاید از این می‌ترسیم که روزی بفهمیم می‌توانستیم جور دیگری زندگی کنیم و نکردیم. مرگ فقط پایان آینده نیست... گاهی آینه‌ای است که ارزش انتخاب‌های امروزمان را آشکار می‌کند! اگر بدانیم زمان محدود است، چرا بخش بزرگی از آن را صرف چیزهایی می‌کنیم که حتی برایمان مهم نیستند؟ اگر مطمئن بودید فقط پنج سال دیگر فرصت زندگی دارید، کدام بخش زندگی امروزتان را دیگر ادامه نمی‌

👍81👌1

27 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC898 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

به گذشته که نگاه میکنم متوجه می‌شوم سخت ترین بخش زندگی سروکله زدن با آدم‌هاست. خاطرات یک آدمکش کیم یونگ ها به سرچشمه تروماها که نگاه کنی میبینی از تقریبا همه ش از انسانه، از دیگری.... از حیوان یا طبعیت نمیتونی ناراحت باشی کدام یک از تروماهای تو از طبیعت یا حیوانه؟ 🌿 @Calmlife

👍122👌2

27 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC897 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

بسیاری از ما به مدادی که روی آب است چسبیده ایم و گمان می کنیم که دستگیری داریم ، در صورتی که غرق شده ایم و خواب نجات را می بینیم فرانتس کافکا 🌿 @Calmlife

👍71

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @calmlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTCAnonymous Poll168 voters

دوستان یه سوال به این چیزها باور دارید؟

  1. کارما30%
  2. فنگ‌شویی7%
  3. ساعت طلایی4%
  4. قانون جذب15%
  5. آب احساس داره12%
  6. همه شون چرتن، به هیچ کدام باور ندارم51%
  7. همه ش رو باور دارم12%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

روانشناسی آرامش ذهن
@Arameshzehn44 · 49,303
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
صدای مهربانی
@sedaye_mehrabani · 28,116
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 September 2026
کتابیسم
@ketab_iism · 44,333
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
پادکست‌های مجتبی‌شکوری
@drmojtaba_shakoori · 64,733
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
هوای حوا
@Havaye_Havva · 36,853
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
کتابخانه دانشگاهی
@Academic_Library · 144,543
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
مرسی تی وی🌿🌺
@mer30tv · 54,658
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
طنین فرزانگی
@Tanine_farzanegi · 30,545
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
کتابخانه
@bookhapdf · 75,591
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Beautiful Mind” (@calmlife), 14,282 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/calmlife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.