16 measurements spanning 14 days, net +3,216. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,413–54,161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 20:54
53,283
-330
20 Aug 2026, 16:04
53,613
+3,373
19 Aug 2026, 14:43
50,240
-61
18 Aug 2026, 15:19
50,301
-72
17 Aug 2026, 18:47
50,373
-69
16 Aug 2026, 16:06
50,442
-137
14 Aug 2026, 21:55
50,579
-113
13 Aug 2026, 16:39
50,692
-101
12 Aug 2026, 12:53
50,793
-62
11 Aug 2026, 16:04
50,855
+22
10 Aug 2026, 16:12
50,833
+872
9 Aug 2026, 19:41
49,961
-32
8 Aug 2026, 20:53
49,993
-61
7 Aug 2026, 17:24
50,054
-13
7 Aug 2026, 13:15
50,067
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:06
50,067
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.87%
avg views ÷ 53,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,590
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
65 (1 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
166,000
Reactions total
8,653
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,500
Videos
≈228
Links
≈717
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,653 reactions across 64 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,757
31.9%
🔥
2,416
27.9%
👍
2,336
27.0%
😁
655
7.57%
🤡
471
5.44%
👎
18
0.208%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,653reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17,697
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 64 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
6,670
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptaad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌟АВАТАРКИ НА ГИФТАХ - ОШИБКА?
За активность в комментариях можно получить 😀
Адлер тоберг рассказал что аватарки в углу нфт подарка нужны лишь для новой фишки с подписью гифтов, а в профиль они попали случайно 🌟
Ждем обновление с исправлением багов?
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
Ежедневная рубрика:
Изменения цен на подарки за последние 24 часа
За активность в комментариях можно получить 😀
Топ 3 роста:
🎁 Eternal Rose 📈 +4.2%
🎁 Plush Pepe 📈 +3.98%
🎁 Nail bracelet 📈 +3.73%
Интересный факт: первоначальный тираж 🎁 Eternal Rose составлял 50000, из них 12360 было сожжено. Улучшенных подарков сейчас 31937 шт.
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
🌟ЛУЧШЕЕ ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ ТГ?
Стали известны новые функции вчерашнего обновления Telegram🌟
Аватарка отправителя на подарках
Теперь подарки в профиле будут отмечены аватаркой пользователя, который их подарил
Подписи к подаркам
На подарках отправленных через внутренний тг маркет теперь можно оставлять подпись!
🌟Полный список нововведений:
• Встроенный кошелёк TON (Gram) — отдельный раздел внутри Telegram. Функция может по…
🌟СЛИЛИ СКИН НА ФОНАРИК
Вот такую красоту на вампирскую тематику нам стоит ожидать, как вам?
UPD: оказалось что это кулон 🎁
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
🎁 Бесплатное NFT
Только для наших подписчиков.
✅ Crypta AD
🏆 Победитель:
1. keolari (@dobrofile)
Boost на канал кратно увеличивает ваши шансы на победу😈
🌟УЛУЧШЕНИЯ ЛАМП SOON?
Креативный директор Telegram рассказал, что улучшения🎁Ламп готовы уже на 99% — похоже, ждать осталось совсем недолго🌟
Также он рассказал, что половина скинов на 🎁 кулоны уже готова!
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
🌟 ИТОГИ КОНКУРСА СРЕДИ КОММЕНТАТОРОВ
Победителем стал @lollipapka🌟
Приз отправлен
🌟Ссылка на комментарий
В комментах под этим постом видео прокрутки рандомайзера 👇
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
Павел Дуров рука об руку вместе с Адлером, собственноручно, лично, взялся за дизайны Redo 🎁
10 уникальных комментариев получат 🧸
По крайней мере так нам сообщил креативный директор.
Но мне интересно другое, что в этот момент делает Адель? Ну вы поняли о чем я 😁
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
Немного порадовал активных ребят с чата
Выбрал вот такие красивые модели...
как вам? Пойдет?
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟 CryptaAD chat 🌟 CryptaAD
Ежедневная рубрика:
Изменения цен на подарки за последние 24 часа
За активность в комментариях можно получить 😀
Топ 3 роста:
🎁 Spiced Wine 📈 +6.36%
🎁 Big Year 📈 +5.26%
👁 Evil Eye 📈 +4.35%
Интересный факт: первоначальный тираж 🎁 Spiced Wine составлял 400000, из них 254000 было сожжено. Улучшенных подарков сейчас 107614 шт.
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
🌟КРИПТА СНОВА ЛЕТИТ ВВЕРХ
Bitcoin уже подбирается к отметке 77 000$, а тон уверенно движется следом! 📈
💰BTC — 76 500$ (+10%)
🪙 ETH — 2 385$ (+6.19%)
💎GRAM — 1.48$ (+9.16%)
🕹🕹🕹 — Твой шанс сделать $100 из $1, всем даем по мишке
🌟CryptaAD chat 🌟CryptaAD
❤38👍30🔥16😁13🤡6👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @cryptaad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 141,854 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бэкспейс @backspace_mag · 133,756 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Удалёнка 24/7 @worko_com · 186,824 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
VideootWELVURA @tsitatyns · 190,343 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
Конспиролог Файлы Эпштейна Остров @TamaevAshabTG · 215,893 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
КСТАТИ, экономика @kstati_e · 101,316 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Очко Олексія Кулеби @shkilmaksym · 238,852 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Факт дня @faktiru · 686,900 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Bar @icryptobar · 87,443 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
МЕМАЧ @memachh · 4,410,526 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 August 2026
СМИ Россия не Москва @smi_rf_moskva · 2,592,455 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 August 2026
Жеcть дня @zhestnovosty · 1,468,102 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypta AD Смотрящего” (@cryptaad), 53,283 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptaad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.