Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for COIN DIGGERS

Channel

COIN DIGGERS

@Coindigs

Not marked by Telegram, checked 9 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,155subscribers

-517 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002192430629
TypeChannel
Username@Coindigs
DescriptionИнформация о самых выгодных Tap2Earn проектах, а еще Airdrop, NFT, Crypto. Для связи @Hamsterk1ng
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Coindigs

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

84.8 average views per post against 30,225 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.28%. Across the 24,466 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.58% and 23.3%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (21 July 2026 20 August 2026)
Posts measured82 of 82 published in the window (82 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled6,950
Mature posts only0.286% over 77 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers30,225 measured 20 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 24,466 channels · p10 2.70% · p25 5.58% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.3% · p90 41.6%
Position in cohort0.948th percentile · 1/42 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.096% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

30,15530,67230,413.57 August 2026 — 30,672 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,672 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,664 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,644 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,601 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,553 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,512 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,482 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,433 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,387 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,340 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,299 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,254 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,225 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,211 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,155 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net -517. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,077–30,750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 17:0830,155-56
21 Aug 2026, 04:5530,211-14
20 Aug 2026, 07:4130,225-29
19 Aug 2026, 10:0730,254-45
18 Aug 2026, 11:4730,299-41
17 Aug 2026, 09:3630,340-47
15 Aug 2026, 14:1730,387-46
14 Aug 2026, 04:1530,433-49
12 Aug 2026, 22:1330,482-30
11 Aug 2026, 23:5730,512-41
11 Aug 2026, 02:0130,553-48
10 Aug 2026, 00:5830,601-43
8 Aug 2026, 23:3230,644-20
7 Aug 2026, 20:1530,664-8
7 Aug 2026, 13:0030,672no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:4930,672first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.274%
avg views ÷ 30,155 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.5
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held93 (3 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total7,673
Reactions total1,621
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,780
Videos
99
Links
1,390

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 39s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,621 reactions across 93 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,43188.3%
🔥784.81%
774.75%
😱201.23%
👎40.247%
🎉30.185%
👏30.185%
🙏20.123%
😁10.062%
🤔10.062%
🥰10.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,621reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC18 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 🔓 Эксплойт моста SAND: хакер начеканил 14,9 млрд токенов The Sandbox столкнулась с серьёзным инцидентом: атакующий получил права на минтинг SAND и выпустил токены сверх обеспечения через кросс-чейн мост между Base и BNB Smart Chain. По данным PeckShield, на двух адресах появилось около 14,9 млрд SAND — объём, способный обрушить рынок. Биржи уже отреагировали: Upbit предупредил о волатильности, а Bithumb приостано

👍21🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 ⚡ Solana жмёт на газ: первый этап апгрейда уже в мейннете Сеть сократила среднее время слота с 400 до 350 мс — это первый шаг по плану SIMD-0525. Впереди ещё три апгрейда, которые ужмут тайминги до 300, 250 и 200 мс. Меньше задержка — быстрее подтверждение транзакций и выше устойчивость к цензуре. Для сети, которая позиционирует себя как самый быстрый блокчейн, это способ удержать лидерство по пропускной способно

👍21🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 🔄 Apple увольняет 200+ сотрудников Siri и Vision Pro ради ИИ Компания сокращает команды Siri и Vision Pro — примерно по сотне человек из каждого отдела. Причина: ассистент и Apple Intelligence заметно отстают от конкурентов, и Кук решил действовать жёстко. – Глава отдела ИИ покинул пост — видимо, за то, что Siri не дотянулась до уровня GPT и Gemini; – Apple официально отложила часть функций персонализации ассист

👍21🔥1

22 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 🌐 Telegram маскирует прокси под обычный сайт Мессенджер готовит новый способ обхода блокировок: подключение будет прятаться внутри обычного HTTPS-трафика. Telegram Desktop сможет соединяться через HTTPS/WebSocket, а внутри «безобидного» канала пойдёт MTProxy-трафик. Сам домен продолжит работать как обычная веб-страница — со стороны его не отличить от любого другого сайта. Это большой шаг для пользователей из стра

👍21🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 ⚡ Tether напечатали $2 млрд USDT и тут же сожгли Эмитент крупнейшего стейблкоина выпустил на Ethereum 2 млрд токенов, доведя предложение до рекорда, а затем отправил те же монеты на уничтожение. Это стандартная техническая процедура управления ликвидностью: сначала чеканят токены для будущих выпусков, потом сжигают, если спрос не подтвердился. По сути, переброска между внутренними кошельками, которая не меняет ре

👍21🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 ⚡ EU AI Act лишил писателя контракта на $2 млн В августе вступили в силу ключевые нормы европейского регулирования ИИ: теперь сгенерированный контент нужно маркировать, чтобы защитить индустрию от дипфейков. Но закон обнажил неожиданную проблему — авторам приходится доказывать, что текст написан человеком. Яркий пример — писатель Джерри Фаладе. Издательство отозвало его роман и разорвало контракт на $2 млн не из-

👍21🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 📈 Резерв Strategy снова в плюсе: бумажная прибыль превысила $1 млрд На балансе компании 840 447 BTC, купленных в среднем по $75 385. После скачка курса до $76,7 тыс. (рост 21% за неделю) стоимость резерва достигла $64,46 млрд — это на $1,1 млрд выше затрат. Резкий разворот после убыточного квартала: во втором квартале Strategy зафиксировала минус $8,2 млрд из-за падения цены до $60 тыс. Теперь стратегия Сэйлора с

👍21🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 📱 ChatGPT теперь рулит iMessage — правила игры меняются OpenAI запустила поддержку iMessage внутри ChatGPT. Теперь нейросеть напишет сообщение, отредактирует черновик или разберёт входящие — всё без выхода из чата. Интеграция работает через Apple Intelligence и появится на iOS, iPadOS и macOS уже в этом году. Что это значит: – Siri станет заметно умнее: сложные запросы подхватит ChatGPT – Writing Tools получит

👍21🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 ⚡ Binance открыла биржу для ИИ-агентов Binance запустила платформу Agent OS и собственный MCP Server — теперь нейросети могут стандартизированно подключаться к сервисам биржи. Это официальный «мост» между ИИ-инструментами и торговой инфраструктурой. Что умеют агенты после авторизации: – получать рыночные данные в реальном времени; – открывать спотовые и фьючерсные сделки; – переводить средства между счетами вн

👍31🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 💰 Solmate докупила SOL: казначейство выросло до $102 млн Криптоинфраструктурная компания Solmate, держащая нативную монету Solana как главный актив, докупила ещё 1000 SOL. Теперь на балансе — 1,25 млн SOL, это примерно $102,2 млн. Компания делает ставку на долгосрочный рост экосистемы. Solmate — институциональный игрок из ОАЭ, который строит инфраструктуру для Solana и соединяет капитал с офчейн-стороны с блокчей

👍21🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC61 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 💸 X Маска готовит выплаты авторам в криптовалюте Соцсеть X ведёт переговоры о внедрении стейблкоинов вроде USDC от Circle для выплат роялти блогерам. Об этом сообщает CoinDesk со ссылкой на источники. Официально компания не комментирует, но шаг логичен: SpaceX уже использует стейблкоины для оплат Starlink в развивающихся странах. Косвенно слухи подтверждает кадровая политика: в марте Маск нанял экс-главу дизайна

👍21🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚀 💸 ИИ-агенты в крипте: кто успеет заработать Fidelity считает, что массовые автоматические платежи сами по себе почти ничего не дадут блокчейнам. Гораздо ценнее для сетей — торговля, кредитование и другие операции, генерирующие комиссии. Эксперты видят двухуровневую денежную систему: биткоин как слой сбережений, стейблкоины — как слой расходов. По аналогии с золотом и фиатом. Темпы внедрения ИИ бьют рекорды: техн

👍2🔥1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @Coindigs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 964,251 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Bar
@icryptobar · 87,443
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
КРИПТОЧАЙ
@icryptotea · 82,632
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Очко Олексія Кулеби
@shkilmaksym · 238,852
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
MEM Notcoin
@mem_notcoin · 84,916
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Типичный Инвестор
@eduardinvest · 1,449,814
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Doctor Baks
@doctorbaks · 120,315
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Trugiant
@trugiantcrypto · 166,517
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
Крипто | Лента
@prodengibar · 162,943
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
КСТАТИ, экономика
@kstati_e · 101,316
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“COIN DIGGERS” (@Coindigs), 30,155 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Coindigs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.