Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Влад | КриптоСамец

Channel

Влад | КриптоСамец

@cryptosamec

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,438subscribers

-5,299 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001811105138
TypeChannel
Username@cryptosamec
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptosamec

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,43823,73721,087.57 August 2026 — 23,737 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,737 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,735 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,715 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,697 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,689 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,679 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,657 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,646 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,625 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,593 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,582 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,572 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,553 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,532 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,514 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,493 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,469 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,455 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,437 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,410 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,398 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,384 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,375 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,351 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,334 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,321 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,285 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,242 subscribers10 September 2026 — 23,195 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,175 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,162 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,132 subscribers17 September 2026 — 23,112 subscribers27 September 2026 — 22,938 subscribers4 October 2026 — 22,851 subscribers9 October 2026 — 22,774 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,785 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,175 subscribers15 October 2026 — 20,852 subscribers16 October 2026 — 20,528 subscribers17 October 2026 — 20,267 subscribers18 October 2026 — 19,944 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,654 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,327 subscribers21 October 2026 — 19,035 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,729 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,438 subscribers7 August 202624 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 78 days, net -5,299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,643–24,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 01:1718,438-291
23 Oct 2026, 00:0818,729-306
21 Oct 2026, 19:3919,035-292
20 Oct 2026, 17:5919,327-327
19 Oct 2026, 15:2619,654-290
18 Oct 2026, 17:3419,944-323
17 Oct 2026, 19:0620,267-261
16 Oct 2026, 21:1620,528-324
15 Oct 2026, 19:2920,852-323
14 Oct 2026, 20:0021,175-610
13 Oct 2026, 08:1721,785-989
9 Oct 2026, 06:3922,774-77
4 Oct 2026, 17:5922,851-87
27 Sept 2026, 00:3722,938-174
17 Sept 2026, 16:0123,112-20
15 Sept 2026, 13:2123,132-30
14 Sept 2026, 01:2023,162-13
12 Sept 2026, 09:3923,175-20
10 Sept 2026, 05:1423,195-47
6 Sept 2026, 23:0123,242first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 8 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.525%
avg views ÷ 18,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.9
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held23 (8 October 2025 – 11 October 2026)
Views total678
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 15:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

336 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11935.4%
❤9829.2%
🔥5115.2%
😁4112.2%
🎄144.17%
🤯123.57%
😱10.298%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 10:43 UTC47 viewsread 12 October 2026

ИИ взломает криптовалюту раньше квантовых компьютеров ИИ может научиться подбирать ключи от Bitcoin и Ethereum кошельков раньше, чем появятся достаточно мощные квантовые компьютеры. Так считает исследователь Ethereum Джастин Дрейк, и он предложил заранее к этому готовиться. Для взлома, по его оценке, хватит кластера GPU и недели времени. Защита от этого простая: не держать деньги на адресе, с которого уже отправля…

10 Oct 2026, 15:11 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Страшнее взлома будет реакция на него Я думаю, главный риск из истории про «ИИ-катастрофу через 6-12 месяцев» не сам взлом, а то, что общество и власти сделают в первые 48 часов после него. К этому сценарию готовятся хуже всего. По телеграм-каналам гуляет пересказ с заголовком «Эксперты сходятся во мнении, что ИИ-катастрофа случится через 6-12 месяцев». У Axios от 9 октября 2026 заголовок другой: «Scoop: AI compani…

❤1

10 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Границы для агента надо ставить в среде, а не в промпте Я не вижу в этой истории ничего неожиданного. Модель, которую обучали получать награду за обход препятствий, на реальном сайте обходит препятствия. Странно было бы, если бы она вела себя иначе. Anthropic опубликовала отчёт о том, что её модели делали на живых сайтах во время тестов: - Mythos 5 нашёл в настройках онлайн-карты недвижимости действующие токены до…

👍1😁1

10 Oct 2026, 05:46 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Выбор модели под задачу теперь важнее, чем её размер Выбор модели под задачу теперь важнее самой модели, и Haiku 5.5 это хорошо показывает. Я не удивился бы, если бы для половины агентных пайплайнов она оказалась полезнее Opus, просто потому что Opus там не нужен. Типичная картина: большая часть действий агента это чтение файлов, запуск команд и сводки. И всё это крутится на самой дорогой модели. Не потому что кто…

👍1

8 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC108 views3 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Anthropic уже начала раздавать подписчикам Max бесплатный API-баланс — $100 или $200 в месяц, в зависимости от тарифа. Кнопка появляется не у всех сразу, её раскатывают в течение двух дней. Забрать можно так: 1) Зайдите на platform.claude.com, чтобы у вас появилась API-организация 2) На claude.ai откройте Настройки → Биллинг 3) Нажмите Link organization и выберите свою организацию 4) Готово! Там же видна дата следу…

🔥3

7 Oct 2026, 18:02 UTC104 views2 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Haiku 5.5 уже тут! Вышла Claude Haiku 5.5, самая быстрая и дешёвая модель Anthropic Цена упала примерно на 75% по сравнению с Haiku 4.5. На запросах до 100k токенов разница доходит до 90%. Input теперь стоит $0.10 за 1M токенов, output $0.50 При этом модель сильно умнее прошлой Haiku — OSWorld 72% против 16% — Terminal-Bench 39% против 0% — HLE 46% против 10% Впервые у Haiku появился effort, можно выбирать между …

👍2

25 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Opus 5.5 пишет код, Fable подсказывает: в Claude Code появился советник Если основная модель у тебя Opus 5.5, квоту на Fable можно пустить в дело. Команда `/advisor fable` подключает Fable как советника, к которому Opus обращается сам. Происходит это в три ключевых момента: перед тем как взяться за план, когда одна и та же ошибка повторяется и перед тем как сказать «готово». Fable видит всю сессию целиком со всеми …

🔥2

22 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC228 viewsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Вышли Opus 5.5 (в 5+ раз дешевле и круче Fable) и GPT-6 Sol (в 2 раза дешевле 5.6!!). То есть обе модели одновременно значительно круче и дешевле своих предшественников (а не прошло и 2 месяцев). Вот так примерно это и будет происходить. Мир не перевернется и не остановится. OpenAI в посте говорят что планируют работать с топ математиками и университетами, чтобы выпускать больше доказательств и решений в более сист…

3 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC401 views2 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Бенчмарки Astra от инсайдеров. Если это правда, то это пиздец. ARC-AGI-3, Frontier Math и Exploit Bench 💀 Брокман говорит: «Добро пожаловать в AGI». OpenAI планирует открыть доступ к GPT-6 Astra платным пользователям ChatGPT и через API в ближайшие дни.

🤯1😱1

24 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC802 views7 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Claude Opus 5 уже вышел Как и ожидалось, по уровню возможностей Opus 5 по цифрам круче Fable и Sol 5.6, но в два раза дешевле — цена такая же, как у старого Opus В ближайшее время буду гонять его и в хвост и в гриву Тестируем, наслаждаемся Карточка модели

👍5🔥1🤯1

14 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC638 views5 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Получил разрешение от Anthropic использовать их ИИ для пентеста. Больше никаких «Я понимаю, что это может быть важно для вас, но я не могу помочь со взломом чужой системы» в ответ на мои запросы. Теперь жду, когда OpenAI тоже дадут добро. Ну и параллельно пытаюсь выклянчить у них бесплатных токенов на кругленькую сумму, вдруг прокатит.

👍2🤯2🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC648 views4 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Ведущий инженер Anthropic случайно засветил своё личное хранилище Obsidian. Внутри: ни кода, ни промптов. Только схема его собственного мышления, построенная как нейросеть. 8 893 узла. 4 729 связей Живой мозг для принятия решений внутри компании: 9 000 документов, каждый как отдельное пространство знаний, все связаны между собой. Он получает около $2 млн в год за то, что раскладывает markdown-файлы по нужным папкам…

🔥2👍1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @cryptosamec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Moon Patrol
@moonpatrol_media · 82,674
#1
Где деньги Криптовски
@kriptovsky_drop · 134,918
#2
🦇CTBAR🦇
@ctbarcrypto · 55,156
#3
Crypto-Крипта |News|Prop-Trading|Crypto projects️
@cryptonews_nft2023 · 41,544
#4
🇺🇦PRO TRON NEWS🇺🇦
@Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 37,133
#5
Арбузер
@arbuzvcryptee · 22,201
#6
FOX & TOKENS
@fox_buy · 49,191
#7
Slonya Ra (ton arc)
@slonyaraton · 95,591
#8
mnimiy.crypto{?}
@mnimiycrypto · 13,420
#9
ЧП | НОВОСТИ РОССИИ
@pig_in_crypto · 70,769
#10
JDM Crypto
@jdm_crypto1 · 50,150
#11
CRYPTEP
@cryptep · 56,681
#12
Лёха в Short’ах Long’ует
@team_krm · 825,135
#13
🐋ЭсTONец на TONе
@estonec_na_tone · 33,573
#14
HAYZON
@hayzonn · 2,645,244
#15
Crypto Broke
@BrokeinCrpt · 91,450
#16
WORLD CRYPTO
@WORLD_CRYPTO23 · 5,851
#17
🤑ALEKSEY PAS - Crypto Investor
@krm_crypto · 185,324
#18
TONomania | Crypto
@T0Nomania · 148,856
#19
Crypto Wolf
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,060,303
#20
TonsBase⚡️Live
@tons_base · 462,941
#21
ФАНТОМ ПОЗНАЕТ КРИПТУ👻
@CryptoFantomDrop · 318,832
#22
Россия Вещает | News
@vestirussia · 933,141
#23
INVEST CRYPTO | AirDrops | News
@investcrypto_tg · 196,041
#24
CRYPTO PUNK🪁
@C_R_Y_P_T_O_P_U_N_K · 515,684
#25
Trader UA 🇺🇦
@trader_ua1 · 321,446
#26
Geeks Crypto
@geekstonmedia · 272,453
#27
Crypto - TEAM | JEMAN
@crypto_jeman · 635,925
#28
DeCenter — блокчейн, биткоин, инвестиции
@DeCenter · 1,699,497
#29
TON AirDrop (RU)💎
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,065,143
#30
Raw & Chill
@Raw_Chill · 67,765
#31
Тренды России | Новости
@onerussia · 1,317,324
#32
Bergerz
@Bergerz1 · 65,945
#33
Крипта Скруджа ⚡️
@crypta · 516,431
#34
Ladesov Crypto
@eeusd · 1,087,521
#35
CRYPTO BULL💸
@cryppttoo_bull · 1,373
#36
Architecton Wallet Media🦄
@architecton_tech · 1,897,215
#37
Криптопаук 🎆
@CryptoPayk · 150,605
#38
Crypto Burg 🏙️
@crypburg · 144,538
#39
Ledger Media l Крипта и блокчейн
@Ledger_Media · 95,261
#40
BITCOIN / ETH / SOL
@solid_web · 82,124
#41
Digitality / Диджиталити
@digitality · 190,284
#42
Palantir
@Palantir_116 · 68,577
#43
Ton.Fo
@tonfo · 133,853
#44
Monkey on TON
@Monkey_on_TON · 774,702
#45
PIGS Community
@pigscrew · 2,014,771
#46
HEXN.IO Channel
@hexnio · 1,889,888
#47
Alex Falcon
@iamalexfalcon · 2,893,986
#48
PocketFi News
@pocketfi · 1,696,345
#49
Simple Wallet
@smpl_app · 1,538,200
#50
EARTH TON
@earthtonofficial · 21,031
#51
billion_wallet
@billion_wallet · 1
#52
Mining telegram bots 🔴⚫️
@telegabotua · 265,089
#53
N1 Channel
@num1_ch · 373,892
#54
Vertus Announcements
@the_vertus · 2,039,516
#55
Trending Apps
@trendingapps · 3,637,179
#56
Amio Community
@AmioCommunity · 1,590,937
#57
TON Station
@tonstationgames · 2,991,280
#58
Cat Gold Miner Announcements
@catgoldminerann · 856,100
#59
Era Of Explorers(EOE)
@EraOfExplorers · 674,950
#60

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bergerz
@Bergerz1 · 65,945
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 September 2026
Raw & Chill
@Raw_Chill · 67,765
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
Где деньги Криптовски
@kriptovsky_drop · 134,918
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
🇺🇦PRO TRON NEWS🇺🇦
@Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 37,133
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
🐋ЭсTONец на TONе
@estonec_na_tone · 33,573
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
CRYPTEP
@cryptep · 56,681
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto-Крипта |News|Prop-Trading|Crypto projects️
@cryptonews_nft2023 · 41,544
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Про Деньги | Финансы
@prodengi · 334,743
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
FOX & TOKENS
@fox_buy · 49,191
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
JDM Crypto
@jdm_crypto1 · 50,150
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Влад | КриптоСамец” (@cryptosamec), 18,438 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosamec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.