ИИ взломает криптовалюту раньше квантовых компьютеров ИИ может научиться подбирать ключи от Bitcoin и Ethereum кошельков раньше, чем появятся достаточно мощные квантовые компьютеры. Так считает исследователь Ethereum Джастин Дрейк, и он предложил заранее к этому готовиться. Для взлома, по его оценке, хватит кластера GPU и недели времени. Защита от этого простая: не держать деньги на адресе, с которого уже отправля…

Channel
Влад | КриптоСамец
@cryptosamec
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,438subscribers
-5,299 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001811105138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptosamec |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptosamec |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:17 | 18,438 | -291 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 18,729 | -306 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 19,035 | -292 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 19,327 | -327 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:26 | 19,654 | -290 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:34 | 19,944 | -323 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 20,267 | -261 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 20,528 | -324 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 20,852 | -323 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 21,175 | -610 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 08:17 | 21,785 | -989 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 06:39 | 22,774 | -77 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 22,851 | -87 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 22,938 | -174 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 23,112 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 23,132 | -30 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 23,162 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 23,175 | -20 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 23,195 | -47 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 23,242 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 8 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.525%
- avg views ÷ 18,438 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 96.9
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.74%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (8 October 2025 – 11 October 2026) |
| Views total | 678 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 15:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 13s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
336 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 119 | 35.4% | |
| ❤ | 98 | 29.2% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 15.2% | |
| 😁 | 41 | 12.2% | |
| 🎄 | 14 | 4.17% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 3.57% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.298% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Страшнее взлома будет реакция на него Я думаю, главный риск из истории про «ИИ-катастрофу через 6-12 месяцев» не сам взлом, а то, что общество и власти сделают в первые 48 часов после него. К этому сценарию готовятся хуже всего. По телеграм-каналам гуляет пересказ с заголовком «Эксперты сходятся во мнении, что ИИ-катастрофа случится через 6-12 месяцев». У Axios от 9 октября 2026 заголовок другой: «Scoop: AI compani…
❤1
Границы для агента надо ставить в среде, а не в промпте Я не вижу в этой истории ничего неожиданного. Модель, которую обучали получать награду за обход препятствий, на реальном сайте обходит препятствия. Странно было бы, если бы она вела себя иначе. Anthropic опубликовала отчёт о том, что её модели делали на живых сайтах во время тестов: - Mythos 5 нашёл в настройках онлайн-карты недвижимости действующие токены до…
👍1😁1
Выбор модели под задачу теперь важнее, чем её размер Выбор модели под задачу теперь важнее самой модели, и Haiku 5.5 это хорошо показывает. Я не удивился бы, если бы для половины агентных пайплайнов она оказалась полезнее Opus, просто потому что Opus там не нужен. Типичная картина: большая часть действий агента это чтение файлов, запуск команд и сводки. И всё это крутится на самой дорогой модели. Не потому что кто…
👍1
Anthropic уже начала раздавать подписчикам Max бесплатный API-баланс — $100 или $200 в месяц, в зависимости от тарифа. Кнопка появляется не у всех сразу, её раскатывают в течение двух дней. Забрать можно так: 1) Зайдите на platform.claude.com, чтобы у вас появилась API-организация 2) На claude.ai откройте Настройки → Биллинг 3) Нажмите Link organization и выберите свою организацию 4) Готово! Там же видна дата следу…
🔥3
Haiku 5.5 уже тут! Вышла Claude Haiku 5.5, самая быстрая и дешёвая модель Anthropic Цена упала примерно на 75% по сравнению с Haiku 4.5. На запросах до 100k токенов разница доходит до 90%. Input теперь стоит $0.10 за 1M токенов, output $0.50 При этом модель сильно умнее прошлой Haiku — OSWorld 72% против 16% — Terminal-Bench 39% против 0% — HLE 46% против 10% Впервые у Haiku появился effort, можно выбирать между …
👍2
Opus 5.5 пишет код, Fable подсказывает: в Claude Code появился советник Если основная модель у тебя Opus 5.5, квоту на Fable можно пустить в дело. Команда `/advisor fable` подключает Fable как советника, к которому Opus обращается сам. Происходит это в три ключевых момента: перед тем как взяться за план, когда одна и та же ошибка повторяется и перед тем как сказать «готово». Fable видит всю сессию целиком со всеми …
🔥2
Вышли Opus 5.5 (в 5+ раз дешевле и круче Fable) и GPT-6 Sol (в 2 раза дешевле 5.6!!). То есть обе модели одновременно значительно круче и дешевле своих предшественников (а не прошло и 2 месяцев). Вот так примерно это и будет происходить. Мир не перевернется и не остановится. OpenAI в посте говорят что планируют работать с топ математиками и университетами, чтобы выпускать больше доказательств и решений в более сист…
Бенчмарки Astra от инсайдеров. Если это правда, то это пиздец. ARC-AGI-3, Frontier Math и Exploit Bench 💀 Брокман говорит: «Добро пожаловать в AGI». OpenAI планирует открыть доступ к GPT-6 Astra платным пользователям ChatGPT и через API в ближайшие дни.
🤯1😱1
Claude Opus 5 уже вышел Как и ожидалось, по уровню возможностей Opus 5 по цифрам круче Fable и Sol 5.6, но в два раза дешевле — цена такая же, как у старого Opus В ближайшее время буду гонять его и в хвост и в гриву Тестируем, наслаждаемся Карточка модели
👍5🔥1🤯1
Получил разрешение от Anthropic использовать их ИИ для пентеста. Больше никаких «Я понимаю, что это может быть важно для вас, но я не могу помочь со взломом чужой системы» в ответ на мои запросы. Теперь жду, когда OpenAI тоже дадут добро. Ну и параллельно пытаюсь выклянчить у них бесплатных токенов на кругленькую сумму, вдруг прокатит.
👍2🤯2🔥1
Ведущий инженер Anthropic случайно засветил своё личное хранилище Obsidian. Внутри: ни кода, ни промптов. Только схема его собственного мышления, построенная как нейросеть. 8 893 узла. 4 729 связей Живой мозг для принятия решений внутри компании: 9 000 документов, каждый как отдельное пространство знаний, все связаны между собой. Он получает около $2 млн в год за то, что раскладывает markdown-файлы по нужным папкам…
🔥2👍1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @cryptosamec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@moonpatrol_media · 82,674#1
@kriptovsky_drop · 134,918#2
@ctbarcrypto · 55,156#3
@cryptonews_nft2023 · 41,544#4
@Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 37,133#5
@arbuzvcryptee · 22,201#6
@fox_buy · 49,191#7
@slonyaraton · 95,591#8
@mnimiycrypto · 13,420#9
@pig_in_crypto · 70,769#10
@jdm_crypto1 · 50,150#11
@cryptep · 56,681#12
@team_krm · 825,135#13
@estonec_na_tone · 33,573#14
@hayzonn · 2,645,244#15
@BrokeinCrpt · 91,450#16
@WORLD_CRYPTO23 · 5,851#17
@krm_crypto · 185,324#18
@T0Nomania · 148,856#19
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,060,303#20
@tons_base · 462,941#21
@CryptoFantomDrop · 318,832#22
@vestirussia · 933,141#23
@investcrypto_tg · 196,041#24
@C_R_Y_P_T_O_P_U_N_K · 515,684#25
@trader_ua1 · 321,446#26
@geekstonmedia · 272,453#27
@crypto_jeman · 635,925#28
@DeCenter · 1,699,497#29
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,065,143#30
@Raw_Chill · 67,765#31
@onerussia · 1,317,324#32
@Bergerz1 · 65,945#33
@crypta · 516,431#34
@eeusd · 1,087,521#35
@cryppttoo_bull · 1,373#36
@architecton_tech · 1,897,215#37
@CryptoPayk · 150,605#38
@crypburg · 144,538#39
@Ledger_Media · 95,261#40
@solid_web · 82,124#41
@digitality · 190,284#42
@Palantir_116 · 68,577#43
@tonfo · 133,853#44
@Monkey_on_TON · 774,702#45
@pigscrew · 2,014,771#46
@hexnio · 1,889,888#47
@iamalexfalcon · 2,893,986#48
@pocketfi · 1,696,345#49
@smpl_app · 1,538,200#50
@earthtonofficial · 21,031#51
@billion_wallet · 1#52
@telegabotua · 265,089#53
@num1_ch · 373,892#54
@the_vertus · 2,039,516#55
@trendingapps · 3,637,179#56
@AmioCommunity · 1,590,937#57
@tonstationgames · 2,991,280#58
@catgoldminerann · 856,100#59
@EraOfExplorers · 674,950#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Bergerz1 · 65,945
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 September 2026
@Raw_Chill · 67,765
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
@kriptovsky_drop · 134,918
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 37,133
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
@estonec_na_tone · 33,573
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
@cryptep · 56,681
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@cryptonews_nft2023 · 41,544
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@prodengi · 334,743
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
@fox_buy · 49,191
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@jdm_crypto1 · 50,150
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Влад | КриптоСамец” (@cryptosamec), 18,438 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosamec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.