Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mnimiy.crypto{?}

Channel

mnimiy.crypto{?}

@mnimiycrypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,315subscribers

-1,225 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002050240756
TypeChannel
Username@mnimiycrypto
DescriptionДа, это жёстко По вопросам сотрудничества и рекламы - @mnilaxx
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mnimiycrypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,31514,54013,927.56 August 20265 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,131–14,724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 05:2113,315-6
4 Nov 2026, 03:2613,321-4
3 Nov 2026, 00:3513,325-7
1 Nov 2026, 23:3013,332-4
31 Oct 2026, 23:1513,336-4
31 Oct 2026, 00:0613,340-11
30 Oct 2026, 02:3813,351-16
29 Oct 2026, 01:1813,367-3
27 Oct 2026, 21:2713,370-16
26 Oct 2026, 17:3713,386-15
25 Oct 2026, 15:5113,401-6
24 Oct 2026, 17:2513,407-13
23 Oct 2026, 19:0613,420-14
22 Oct 2026, 19:4813,434-28
21 Oct 2026, 14:1113,462-16
20 Oct 2026, 13:1513,478-10
19 Oct 2026, 14:1013,488-23
18 Oct 2026, 17:0913,511-24
17 Oct 2026, 16:0613,535-18
16 Oct 2026, 13:3613,553first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 13,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held45 (4 May 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total38,560
Reactions total601
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,710
Videos
≈72
Links
≈1,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,430 reactions across 44 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍33823.6%
❤30821.5%
🔥26618.6%
😁22916.0%
🤡1228.53%
💊725.03%
🐳463.22%
🤯402.80%
🤔50.35%
🙏40.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,430 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 44 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mnimiycrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,310 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026

а вот это уже интересно 🚨

❤5👍1🤡1

5 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,290 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026

бля вот эти брачные игры сша иран заебали уже всех, не?🙂 если не воздух, пусть белобрысый хуярит ядерку и мы там дружно откупим по $0.3 тончик и прочее хорошо наблюдать за этим, когда крипта для тебя давно лишь способ оплаты (хотя по эфиру всё равно больно) чедум?

🔥4👍3❤2

4 Nov 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,650 views23 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Спустя 13 лет вернусь сегодня ночью 🤗 кто-то планирует тоже подвигаться?

❤11🐳6🔥3🤔2👍1

31 Oct 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,860 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Подарочным завезли лучшую коллекцию эвер 🤗 Грех спорить, пока это пик со стороны тг дизов. Завтра у меня др и открою свои 30+- масочек на видос 🙂 Сегодня же чуть позже вернусь с опросом, а то пока позор... Мнимый. Открываться.

🔥11❤6👍4

29 Oct 2026, 21:03 UTC≈1,740 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Храните деньги под подушкой 🙏

👍9🤯5🔥4

29 Oct 2026, 17:13 UTC≈1,890 views24 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁11👍7🔥4💊1🤔1

28 Oct 2026, 16:44 UTC≈2,980 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026

блять а где опрос

😁14🔥2❤1👍1🤔1

28 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,900 views20 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Помимо постов про игры, игрушки, готовлю и интересные посты. Я хочу заонбордить абсолютно каждого живого подписчика, кто всё ещё юзает GPT как кулинарную книгу или умный гугл ⌨️ Выбирайте в опросе, что вам интересно больше всего 🤗

❤14🔥4💊2

28 Oct 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,800 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

не тратьте время на кастрированную версию ИИ агента от друзей Дурова даже несмотря на то, что многим в этом проекте рулит Карим (ака некогда GasPump фаундер), все проекты роксмана = копирка с целью извлечения максимально возможной выгоды как бизнесмен, он хорош, ничего не скажешь, но как создатель чего-то стоящего)))))))))))))) потратьте по большей мере часик-два и установите себе Hermes в тг. как? есть куча гайдо…

👍15😁6❤4🔥2🐳1

26 Oct 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,710 views31 reactionsread 5 November 2026

антропик айпио)))) пидорасы ебаные на костях русских аккаунтов набрали себе карманы баксов 🤬🤬🤬

❤15👍9🔥5😁2

24 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,940 views24 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

чатжпт сделай мне картинку вот там возьми ассеты и чтоб короче хайпово и красиво мол открыли кладбище и ивент ебать, а по середине стоит босс ну пиздатый наш тыква с косой и надпись сверху ахуеть graveyard is open ⌨️⌨️ Обещанный ивент в Last Chance уже в проде 🙂 > Новая карта с могильным (как у блокчейна TON) вайбом > 10 новых противников, у 8 из которых своя уникальная механика > Босс — Жнец Чёрной Тыквы — легенда…

❤12🔥7👍5

23 Oct 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,660 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Хахахахахахахаахаххаха еблище американских фронтиров и Трампа представили 🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️🏋️‍♂️

👍10🔥6😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @mnimiycrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🐋ЭсTONец на TONе
@estonec_na_tone · 32,657
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
Bambooster 🐼
@bambooster · 41,703
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
ton://backrooms
@cryptoroflston · 138,867
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
CryptoCash | Трейдеры
@cryptoanlyst · 39,327
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 August 2026
JDM Crypto
@jdm_crypto1 · 49,533
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Slonya Ra (ton arc)
@slonyaraton · 93,572
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Крипто Источник | Киты 🐋
@crypto_istok · 39,484
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Horrizon Trading
@Crypto_Horrizon · 39,471
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
WHITE TRADER
@WhiteTradeCom · 41,510
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
🇺🇦PRO TRON NEWS🇺🇦
@Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 36,151
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
OG CRYPTO TRADE
@ogcryptop · 42,431
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Ledger Media l Крипта и блокчейн
@Ledger_Media · 92,969
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Влад | КриптоСамец
@cryptosamec · 18,141
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
CRYPTO FARM - Криптовалюты
@Crypto_FarmTrade · 41,686
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
NEO INSIDER CRYPTO
@neo_cryptoboss · 47,207
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
CRYPTEP
@cryptep · 55,403
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Palantir
@Palantir_116 · 67,014
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
FOX & TOKENS
@fox_buy · 47,847
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto-Крипта |News|Prop-Trading|Crypto projects️
@cryptonews_nft2023 · 40,505
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Про Деньги | Финансы
@prodengi · 324,687
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Арбузер
@arbuzvcryptee · 22,046
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 September 2026
ЧП | НОВОСТИ РОССИИ
@pig_in_crypto · 69,119
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
🦇CTBAR🦇
@ctbarcrypto · 53,940
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Digitality / Диджиталити
@digitality · 186,520
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mnimiy.crypto{?}” (@mnimiycrypto), 13,315 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mnimiycrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.