🎁 НЕ СКАМ - ЗАБРАТЬ ПОДАРОК

Channel
FOX & TOKENS
@fox_buy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,837subscribers
-4,846 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002170499491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fox_buy |
| Description | Сотрудничество/реклама - @buy_foxy Ссылка для друзей и знакомых - https://t.me/+E_AYOvcBRww4OWYy |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fox_buy |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 52,837 | -189 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 53,026 | -245 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 53,271 | -209 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 53,480 | -283 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 53,763 | -167 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 53,930 | -413 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 54,343 | -254 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 54,597 | -183 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:23 | 54,780 | -50 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:04 | 54,830 | -195 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 55,025 | -145 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 55,170 | -121 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 55,291 | -127 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 55,418 | -93 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 55,511 | -76 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 55,587 | -103 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 55,690 | -89 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 55,779 | -240 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 56,019 | -216 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 56,235 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.17%
- avg views ÷ 52,837 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 90.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 August 2025 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 180 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 16:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 376
- Videos
- 87
- Links
- 316
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🎁 Подарки выпадают ВСЕМ! Gorilla Case сейчас выдает NFT-подарки вообще всем в бесплатном кейсе. Поспеши, пока акция не закончилась 👇
⭐️ Хочешь подарю тебе звезды и подарки? Получай их каждые 24 часа в бесплатной рулетке!
🧐 Хотите NFT? Тогда прочтите пост Давно не заходил ни в какие проекты. Думаю, настало время Долгое время слежу за Grow Tea. Вроде, хорошо себя показывают. Поэтому решил тоже поучаствовать, надеясь что они долго будут жить и принесут хороший профит Смысл игры очень простой: сажаем кустики и собираем урожай. Часть дохода получаем в серебре (на покупку внутриигровых предметов) и часть в золоте (можно выводить на коше…
⛰ НАШУМЕВШИЙ РЕЖИМ MINECRAFT — ТЕПЕРЬ В TELEGRAM! 🥇 Готов проверить удачу? 💎 В @RandomGames появился новый топ-режим — настоящий майн-экшен прямо в Telegram! Разбивай блоки, кидай кирку и прокладывай путь к подаркам 🥇 Чем глубже копаешь — тем круче награды!
Pulse event in MRKT is finished! ❓Will TON rise above $2.00 on January 29 at 23:59 UTC+0?❓ 💰Event pool: 18558.38 TON 📢Total votes: 796 📊Event result: - Yes - 7.0% ✅ - No - 93.0% 👇Keep your finger on the Pulse
💎 Получи алмаз за запуск бота
⚰️ Розыгрыш на 9 NFT-подарков Итоги 7 ноября в 20:00 по мск, а условия очень простые: 1. Подписаться на канал @digitality и включить уведомления 2. Вступить в наш чат - [тык] Репост данного розыгрыша увеличивает ваши шансы на победу Всем удачи 🥟
💰Сколько заработает Павел Дуров с новых подарков? 🎁 5000⭐️— 125 000 000⭐️ (=1 875 000 $) 🎁 2500⭐️ — 125 000 000⭐️ (=1 875 000 $) Итого: Павел заработает 3 750 000 $.
✈️ В Telegram вышло обновление В новом обновлении появились профили с музыкой, новые темы на основе подарков и расширенные функции для коллекционеров. Теперь можно добавлять треки на свой профиль, выбирать основную вкладку, дарить друзьям апгрейды для их подарков и следить за статистикой цен на маркетплейсе. 1️⃣ Музыка в профиле Любой аудиофайл можно закрепить на своей странице под аватаркой. Треки автоматически со…
❤1
Мошенники снова воруют подарки💰 🔨В Telegram зафиксированы случаи кражи Gifts 🎁через перехват SMS или SIM-swap, включая аккаунт модератора канала Dino TON с потерями от $2,5 тыс. до $12 тыс. К слову, это может быть очередным топливом для роста анонимных номеров ✈️
🐸 Кирпичи снова дают иксы Сегодня через продан аккаунт с одним кирпичом за 318 TON (≈1000 $). Себестоимость кирпича — 5000 Stars (≈75 $). Чистая прибыль составила 925 $, что равно ≈1233% от изначальной цены.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fox_buy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@digitality · 200,202#1
@pig_in_crypto · 75,438#2
@slonyaraton · 102,016#3
@investcrypto_tg · 207,717#4
@arbuzvcryptee · 22,681#5
@ctbarcrypto · 58,865#6
@BaronTon0 · 875,072#7
@MirWeb3 · 177,745#8
@tonfo · 139,619#9
@Crypto_Meteora · 331,101#10
@mnimiycrypto · 13,824#11
@TON_Elixir · 220,970#12
@CryptoZaryad · 326,766#13
@BrokeinCrpt · 93,694#14
@ton_vseznayka · 172,382#15
@intervtone · 634,517#16
@geekstonmedia · 287,933#17
@T0Nomania · 155,962#18
@WORLD_CRYPTO23 · 6,182#19
@moonpatrol_media · 87,209#20
@lenvies · 1,562,601#21
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#22
@Ledger_Media · 101,922#23
@solid_web · 87,797#24
@cryptonews_nft2023 · 44,371#25
@Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 39,705#26
@CryptoFantomDrop · 345,929#27
@crypto_shrks · 93,621#28
@antizarplata · 78,921#29
@jdm_crypto1 · 54,070#30
@team_krm · 874,677#31
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#32
@belevskmove · 1,078,890#33
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,191,483#34
@C_R_Y_P_T_O_P_U_N_K · 489,108#35
@DeCenter · 1,823,722#36
@tons_base · 486,041#37
@trader_ua1 · 350,781#38
@vestirussia · 986,059#39
@onerussia · 1,407,516#40
@crypto_jeman · 666,447#41
@prodengi · 355,499#42
@pro_crypto · 771,829#43
@Palantir_116 · 70,691#44
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,149,354#45
@krm_crypto · 201,472#46
@cryptep · 60,752#47
@kriptovsky_drop · 143,313#48
@cryptosamec · 23,112#49
@biznest0n · 672,526#50
@geostakeio · 192,933#51
@estonec_na_tone · 36,327#52
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#53
@TonAirDrop_EN · 555,745#54
@Monkey_on_TON · 819,656#55
@hash_cats · 2,095,260#56
@notcoin · 8,643,687#57
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#58
@tomarket_ai · 6,657,802#59
@nomis_protocol · 1,549,523#60
@realgoats_channel · 4,674,136#61
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#62
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#63
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,296,110#64
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#65
@catgoldminerann · 904,797#66
@gram · 6,689,636#67
@GTM_TON · 848,353#68
@autoruss · 833,622#69
@mediarussia · 1,694,028#70
@onus_globalchannel · 1,650,302#71
@dogs · 7,065,215#72
@boomloudcoin · 1,671,644#73
@hexnio · 1,998,607#74
@theyescoin · 5,697,036#75
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#76
@seedupdates · 8,226,508#77
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#78
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#79
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#80
@theTapCoins · 2,919,608#81
@token_1win · 2,980,801#82
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#83
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#84
@fx_holding_community · 6,083,788#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Pro_T_r_o_n_news · 39,705
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
@cryptonews_nft2023 · 44,371
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@prodengi · 355,499
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
@cryptosamec · 23,112
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
@solid_web · 87,797
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
@cryptep · 60,752
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@jdm_crypto1 · 54,070
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@ctbarcrypto · 58,865
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@arbuzvcryptee · 22,681
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 September 2026
@pig_in_crypto · 75,438
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
@moonpatrol_media · 87,209
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@slonyaraton · 102,016
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
@digitality · 200,202
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@Ledger_Media · 101,922
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
@trader_ua1 · 350,781
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@BrokeinCrpt · 93,694
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
@CryptoFantomDrop · 345,929
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
@crypto_lucid · 34,254
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
@ton_vseznayka · 172,382
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
@kriptovsky_drop · 143,313
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@antizarplata · 78,921
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
@estonec_na_tone · 36,327
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
@crypto_shrks · 93,621
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@krm_crypto · 201,472
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOX & TOKENS” (@fox_buy), 52,837 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fox_buy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.