21 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1,849. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,391–48,794 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 18:13
46,668
-90
27 Aug 2026, 16:42
46,758
-74
26 Aug 2026, 14:45
46,832
-80
25 Aug 2026, 13:38
46,912
-100
24 Aug 2026, 10:47
47,012
-163
22 Aug 2026, 19:12
47,175
-132
21 Aug 2026, 11:55
47,307
-73
20 Aug 2026, 10:43
47,380
-58
19 Aug 2026, 12:12
47,438
-82
18 Aug 2026, 11:57
47,520
-119
17 Aug 2026, 13:48
47,639
-88
16 Aug 2026, 09:09
47,727
-148
14 Aug 2026, 22:17
47,875
-100
13 Aug 2026, 11:35
47,975
-50
12 Aug 2026, 12:23
48,025
-114
11 Aug 2026, 09:14
48,139
-100
10 Aug 2026, 11:44
48,239
-95
9 Aug 2026, 10:31
48,334
-66
8 Aug 2026, 13:41
48,400
-102
7 Aug 2026, 15:11
48,502
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.23%
avg views ÷ 46,668 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,310
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
29 (15 June 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
56,000
Reactions total
1,379
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,270
Videos
≈79
Links
≈1,140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,561 reactions across 29 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
948
26.6%
🔥
524
14.7%
❤
466
13.1%
❤🔥
283
7.95%
🎉
218
6.12%
🤩
202
5.67%
🥰
202
5.67%
😍
200
5.62%
💯
171
4.80%
👀
160
4.49%
👏
115
3.23%
👎
24
0.674%
🤷
21
0.59%
🤝
10
0.281%
😎
8
0.225%
😁
3
0.084%
🤔
3
0.084%
⚡
2
0.056%
👌
1
0.028%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,561reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 29 we hold a reading for · 59%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Crypto_FarmTrade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🐂 ВТС вошел в начальную фазу бычьего рынка
Bull Score за последнюю неделю вырос с 30 до 80, а 8 из 10 индикаторов уже дают бычий сигнал.
При этом аналитики предупреждают: после такого резкого роста Bitcoin может сначала уйти в небольшую коррекцию, прежде чем продолжить движение вверх.
Похоже, бычий нарратив снова набирает обороты — но именно в такие моменты рынок иногда любит преподносить сюрпризы 😏
Верим в бычку…
USDT можно тратить так же как рубли в РФ?
С PGON Wallet 🌟 можно хранить USDT и тратить их в повседневной жизни: сервис конвертирует крипту в рубли прямо при оплате.
🌟Отсканировали QR-код → подтвердили оплату → USDT списались, а продавец получил рубли.
А ещё через PGON можно:
- Оплачивать зарубежные сервисы без посредников
- Пополнять связь и оплачивать коммунальные услуги
- Выпускать виртуальную зарубежную карту
- …
🔼CryptoQuant: медвежий тренд Bitcoin завершился
Основатель CryptoQuant Ки Ён Джу заявил, что медвежья фаза Bitcoin фактически завершилась. По его оценке, после длительного снижения рынок начал переходить к новому этапу — спрос на BTC снова становится положительным.
При этом он отмечает, что для полноценного подтверждения нового бычьего цикла позитивная динамика спроса должна сохраниться ещё некоторое время. То есть…
🔽 Трейдеры Kalshi ждут Bitcoin по $54к
Участники рынка на Kalshi делают ставку на дальнейшее снижение Bitcoin
По текущим ожиданиям, BTC в этом году ещё может опуститься к отметке $54 000. Если сценарий реализуется, рынок получит ещё одну серьёзную волну снижения перед возможным формированием дна.
При этом прогнозы на Kalshi отражают ожидания участников рынка, а не гарантированный сценарий.
Увидим BTC по $54k или …
💎Чем дольше торгуешь на централизованных биржах, тем больше начинаешь ценить простые вещи: нормальные комиссии, контроль над своими средствами и отсутствие постоянной зависимости от одной компании.
На этом фоне интересным выглядит Rubin.
Это децентрализованная инфраструктура со своим L1-блокчейном и DEX для торговли бессрочными фьючерсами. Здесь нет привычной модели, где вся торговля завязана на одну централизованн…
🔽Дно Bitcoin уже близко
Аналитики VanEck считают, что Bitcoin приближается к циклическому минимуму.
По их мнению, текущее снижение пока укладывается в привычную структуру четырёхлетнего цикла, поэтому компания рассматривает постепенный набор позиций вместо попыток поймать идеальное дно.
Похоже, крупные игроки уже начинают готовиться к следующей фазе рынка 👀
Дно уже рядом или рынок ещё удивит? 👇
🚬 Очень рискованный шорт
Трейдер открыл шорт на 2 136 BTC примерно на $136 млн, став одним из крупнейших медведей на рынке.
При этом цена ликвидации находится совсем рядом — около $64 592. Любое резкое движение BTC вверх может поставить позицию под угрозу.
Если рынок продолжит расти, крупный шорт может стать топливом для нового шорт-сквиза.
Заработает или ликвиднется?
Bitcoin снова в зоне накопления по Rainbow Chart 🌈
Согласно Rainbow Chart, Bitcoin снова опустился в нижние синие диапазоны — исторически это зона страха и потенциального накопления.
🔴 Красные уровни — сильная жадность и потенциальная зона фиксации прибыли.
🔵 Синие уровни — страх и потенциальная зона накопления.
В прошлый медвежий цикл именно в нижней части индикатора формировалось дно. При этом во время предыдуще…
📣 Покупайте самый дешевый USDT на A7A5
Мы предоставляем лучшие условия на рынке
Сравните сами:
Курс на 11 августа, 10:30 МСК
🏆 A7A5 — 83 ₽
Bynex — 85,6 ₽
Rapira — 85,2 ₽
BestChange — от 86,1 ₽
🔵 У нас вы получаете:
🔵 Чистый USDT без санкционного следа. Вся ликвидность проходит проверку через крупнейшей AML-сервис — Elliptic.
🔵 Легальную покупку крипты с банковской карты. Покупайте A7A5 и обменивайте на USDT пря…
🪙 Bitcoin еще может сходить к $45k-$50k
По аналогии с двумя предыдущими медвежьими циклами Bitcoin финальное дно часто формировалось в зоне 0.382–0.5 по уровням Фибоначчи. Если текущий цикл повторит эту структуру, потенциальной областью завершения коррекции может стать диапазон $45–50 тыс
Всё больше технических индикаторов указывают именно на эту зону как на возможное дно. Однако ни один из них не даёт гарантий — р…
Вряд ли кто-то не сравнивает курсы перед обменом. Но есть одна штука, на которую мало кто смотрит – а зря 💀
Это история криптоадреса. Именно из-за этого потом появляются истории с замороженными депозитами, проверками документов и долгими разбирательствами.
Дело в том, что у крипты есть история. Если монеты раньше проходили через мошеннические схемы, даркнет, санкционные или другие высокорисковые адреса, а затем попа…
🐳 Артур Хейс снова ставит на ENA — рынок относится к этому с осторожностью
Сооснователь BitMEX Arthur Hayes приобрёл 6 млн токенов Ethena на сумму около $525 000 по средней цене $0,09.
📊 На первый взгляд это выглядит как сильный бычий сигнал.
Однако в криптосообществе многие вспоминают, что в последние месяцы сделки Хейса не всегда оказывались удачными:
• 📈 часть покупок совершалась уже после роста цены;
• 📉 некот…
❤61👎24👍22😍9🤩8🔥7❤🔥6🎉6
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Crypto_FarmTrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,113,854 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
OG CRYPTO TRADE @ogcryptop · 47,647 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
NEO INSIDER CRYPTO @neo_cryptoboss · 53,487 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
CryptoCash | Трейдеры @cryptoanlyst · 43,147 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 August 2026
Bambooster 🐼 @bambooster · 44,668 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Крипто Источник | Киты 🐋 @crypto_istok · 44,826 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Horrizon Trading @Crypto_Horrizon · 44,774 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
WHITE TRADER @WhiteTradeCom · 46,597 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
ton://backrooms (cryptorofls) @cryptoroflston · 147,922 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐬 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 @VenustradePro · 83,205 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO FARM - Криптовалюты” (@Crypto_FarmTrade), 46,668 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_FarmTrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.