Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
39 measurements spanning 67 days, net -5,315. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,447–50,356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 07:21
44,244
-278
9 Oct 2026, 00:00
44,522
-322
4 Oct 2026, 15:35
44,844
-649
26 Sept 2026, 13:16
45,493
-402
19 Sept 2026, 10:15
45,895
-171
17 Sept 2026, 01:18
46,066
-149
15 Sept 2026, 05:02
46,215
-177
13 Sept 2026, 13:21
46,392
-149
11 Sept 2026, 18:19
46,541
-165
9 Sept 2026, 05:22
46,706
-272
5 Sept 2026, 22:01
46,978
-148
3 Sept 2026, 21:20
47,126
-94
2 Sept 2026, 14:26
47,220
-149
1 Sept 2026, 15:55
47,369
-56
31 Aug 2026, 17:38
47,425
-99
30 Aug 2026, 20:46
47,524
-61
29 Aug 2026, 23:46
47,585
-62
29 Aug 2026, 02:37
47,647
-87
27 Aug 2026, 23:15
47,734
-88
26 Aug 2026, 21:26
47,822
first reading
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 136 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.11%
avg views ÷ 44,244 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,030
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held
45 (5 June 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total
48,360
Reactions total
1,094
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Oct 2026, 20:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,670
Videos
≈94
Links
≈1,410
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
51s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,146 reactions across 45 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,852
36.0%
🔥
1,270
24.7%
❤
1,255
24.4%
🥰
638
12.4%
⚡
58
1.13%
🤝
42
0.816%
👎
31
0.602%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 45 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ogcryptop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Прямые SWIFT-переводы с оплатой в криптовалюте для бизнеса и частных лиц
A7 запустила новый сервис для оплаты инвойсов в криптовалюте – A7 International.
Как это работает:
1. Клиент переводит USDT через Личный кабинет на a7.biz
2. А7 отправляет платеж через SWIFT по реквизитам из инвойса
3. Оплата контрагенту поступает на банковский счет, без привязки криптокошелька
Условия:
● Фиксированная комиссия 0,3%
● Срок …
🐳 Два гиганта скупают BTC, пока остальные наблюдают...
Интересная статистика по корпоративным покупкам биткоина. С начала года Strategy и Strive приобрели около 197 000 BTC, обеспечив практически весь прирост корпоративных запасов. А вот остальные компании наращивают свои резервы куда скромнее.
И здесь интересный момент: корпоративный спрос вроде бы растёт, но основная его часть сосредоточена всего у двух игроков.
…
А7 представит сервис, который изменит рынок международных платежей
13 октября российская система международных расчётов А7, созданная банком ПСБ, представит А7 International. Теперь можно оплатить счёт зарубежного партнёра в USDT, а деньги поступят обычным банковским переводом по SWIFT в нужной валюте.
Сервис предназначен в первую очередь для участников внешнеэкономической деятельности, но воспользоваться им смогут…
🔮 4chan предсказал конец криптозимы?
В декабре 2023 года анонимный пользователь опубликовал необычный расчёт циклов Bitcoin
По его схеме, от дна до вершины проходит 1 064 дня, а от вершины до следующего дна — 364 дня.
И самое безумное — первая часть действительно сработала. Автор назвал 6 октября 2025 года вершиной цикла, и именно в этот день Bitcoin установил ATH выше $126 000
А дальше становится ещё интереснее:…
USDT на кошельке есть. А на странице оплаты снова просят карту...
Думаю, многим знакомо. Получать деньги в крипте удобно, переводить тоже. Но когда нужно оплатить подписку или покупку в интернете, начинается поиск подходящей карты.
У Invoise можно пройти весь путь: принял оплату в крипте, получил деньги на свой кошелёк и потратил с карты.
Сначала создаёшь инвойс и отправляешь ссылку клиенту. Он оплачивает, деньги …
🟠 17 лет назад за $1 давали 1 309 BTC
5 октября 2009 года появился один из первых известных курсов Bitcoin:
$1 за 1 309 BTC
Получается, один биткоин стоил всего около $0,00076
Сегодня те же 1 309 BTC оценивались бы примерно в $110 млн 😅
Представьте: тогда это был всего один доллар, а сегодня — целое состояние
Сколько бы вы вложили в Bitcoin, если бы могли вернуться в 2009 год?
🤑 UPtober начался?
Похоже, октябрь решил не тянуть с интригой.
BTC снова рванул выше $86k, а ETH вернулся над $2 700. После довольно нервного сентября рынок наконец показывает движение вверх — и пока выглядит так, будто покупатели снова начинают перехватывать инициативу.
Самое интересное — это только начало месяца. Если BTC сможет удержаться выше ключевых уровней, вполне можем увидеть продолжение импульса и попытк…
📊 BTC готовится показать один из лучших Q3 в истории
С июля по сентябрь Bitcoin уже прибавил 43,6%. Если BTC удержит этот результат до конца месяца, третий квартал станет вторым лучшим за всю историю.
Впереди останется только легендарный Q3 2017 года — тогда Bitcoin вырос на 80,4% 🚀
BTC продолжит разгоняться или сентябрь всё испортит? 👇
Курс красивый. А деньги откуда?
При выводе крипты важен не только курс, но и от кого приходят деньги. Перевод, связанный с мошеннической схемой дробления платежей, может обернуться ограничениями по карте и разбирательствами.
Поэтому присмотритесь к 24BitBank! У сервиса более 1 500 настоящих отзывов на BestChange. Можно заранее почитать, как проходили обмены у других людей, посмотреть правила и задать вопросы поддерж…
⚰️ Сколько можно было заработать на «смерти» Bitcoin
Bitcoin хоронили уже столько раз, что на этих похоронах можно было неплохо заработать 😁
Если бы каждый раз после громких заявлений о «смерти» BTC вы вкладывали по $1 000, сегодня результат выглядел бы примерно так:
➖ Forbes, 2011 — $4,92 млн
➖ Уоррен Баффет, 2014 — $127 400
➖ Джейми Даймон, 2017 — $20 700
➖ Баффет снова, 2018 — $8 800
➖ Дональд Трамп, 2019 — $7 …
👀 CryptoQuant: бычий рынок подтверждён!
Bitcoin закрылся выше 365-дневной скользящей средней — уровня, который CryptoQuant использует как исторический ориентир для подтверждения бычьего рынка. Ранее аналитики компании называли именно этот показатель финальным условием для подтверждения нового цикла.
Теперь внимание рынка переключается на следующие уровни сопротивления — $88 000–$90 000. При этом сам факт выхода выш…
📈 Всплеск депозитов в альткоинах
За последние 7 дней количество транзакций с альткоинами на централизованные биржи резко выросло, достигнув одних из самых высоких значений за последние месяцы.
Похожие всплески наблюдались в начале года и в мае — тогда за ростом депозитов следовали волны распродаж. Теперь ситуация повторяется накануне важного заседания ФРС США.
Дополнительный риск создаёт большое количество кредитн…
❤39🔥39👍10🥰5⚡3🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @ogcryptop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
HashCats Official Channel @hash_cats · 2,005,471#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CryptoCash | Трейдеры @cryptoanlyst · 40,603 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 August 2026
Крипто Источник | Киты 🐋 @crypto_istok · 41,229 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Horrizon Trading @Crypto_Horrizon · 41,216 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
WHITE TRADER @WhiteTradeCom · 43,324 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Bambooster 🐼 @bambooster · 42,673 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
CRYPTO FARM - Криптовалюты @Crypto_FarmTrade · 43,225 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
NEO INSIDER CRYPTO @neo_cryptoboss · 49,361 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
ton://backrooms (cryptorofls) @cryptoroflston · 139,173 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐮𝐬 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 @VenustradePro · 76,834 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
PPC @hubnw · 38,305 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
✍TRUTH CHANNEL🦅 @recoveryteamchannel · 19,065 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OG CRYPTO TRADE” (@ogcryptop), 44,244 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ogcryptop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.