Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net +3,738. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,378–25,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:58
24,677
-2
15 Sept 2026, 12:37
24,679
+58
13 Sept 2026, 22:40
24,621
+49
12 Sept 2026, 06:18
24,572
+199
9 Sept 2026, 22:59
24,373
-4
6 Sept 2026, 16:56
24,377
-49
4 Sept 2026, 05:40
24,426
+171
2 Sept 2026, 15:49
24,255
-23
1 Sept 2026, 12:34
24,278
+36
31 Aug 2026, 09:56
24,242
+20
30 Aug 2026, 08:24
24,222
+30
29 Aug 2026, 07:43
24,192
+88
28 Aug 2026, 05:16
24,104
+94
27 Aug 2026, 08:47
24,010
+49
26 Aug 2026, 05:53
23,961
+36
25 Aug 2026, 03:07
23,925
+49
23 Aug 2026, 16:37
23,876
+98
22 Aug 2026, 03:05
23,778
+96
20 Aug 2026, 16:36
23,682
+78
19 Aug 2026, 13:05
23,604
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.95%
avg views ÷ 24,677 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
35 (5 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
3,430
Reactions total
38
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 57s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
521 reactions across 35 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
305
58.5%
🔥
79
15.2%
👍
34
6.53%
👏
33
6.33%
🫡
24
4.61%
🥰
15
2.88%
😁
12
2.30%
💯
7
1.34%
😍
5
0.96%
🤯
4
0.768%
👎
2
0.384%
👌
1
0.192%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بچهها ببینید با Seedance 2.5 برای محصولتون چه ویدیوهای خفنی میشه ساخت 🤯✨
باهاش میتونید برای برند و محصولتون
محتواهایی بسازید که خیلی جذاب، لوکس و متفاوت دیده بشن 🎬
برای معرفی محصول، تبلیغات و ویدیوهای وایرال
واقعاً خروجیهای فوقالعادهای میده 🚀
🤖 راه ارتباط مستقیم با من 👇
@danidouen_bot
بچهها این ویدیو رو ببینید 🤯🔥
با Seedance 2.5 ساخته شده؛
حرکتها، جزئیات و حس سینمایی خروجیها واقعاً خفنه 🎬
با یه پرامپت درست میتونی ویدیوهایی بسازی که تشخیص AI بودنشون سخت میشه! 🚀
🤖 راه ارتباط مستقیم با من 👇
@danidouen_bot
بچهها این ویدیوهای کاراکترهای عجیب غریبی که میبینید معمولا به همین روش ویدیوی بالا ساخته میشن 👆🤖
دیگه دوران کلیپهای شانسی تموم شده.
الان با ترکیب APOB AI و Seedance 2.5 میشه ولاگهای ۳۰ ثانیهای با یه شخصیت ثابت و طبیعی ساخت 🚀
دیگه نیازی نیست برای یه خروجی خوب هی پرامپت عوض کنی و منتظر شانس بمونی.
🤖 راه ارتباط مستقیم با من 👈 @danidouen_bot
سه تا آدمی که تو این ویدیوی بالا ورزش میکنن هیچکدوم واقعی نیستن 👆
این همون بازآفرینی سبک جدید تولید محتوای وایرال با هوش مصنوعیه 🤯
یه ویدیوی وایرال باشگاه رو برداشته و فریم به فریم با همون حرکت برای سه نفر تو کشورهای مختلف کلون کرده.
با ابزار seedance 2.5 و فقط یه پرامپت میتونی هر ویدیویی رو اینجوری موبهمو بازسازی کنی 🤖
🤖 راه ارتباط مستقیم با من 👈 @danidouen_bot
راستی، ابزار هوش مصنوعی Google Flow روزانه ۵۰ کردیت رایگان بهت میده و میتونی باهاش عکسهات رو با Veo 3.1 به ویدئو تبدیل کنی 🎬
کافیه با یه حساب Gmail وارد بشی و برای مصرف کمتر، مدل Veo 3.1 Lite رو انتخاب کنی.
سایت رسمی گوگل فلو 👇
https://labs.google/fx/tools/flow
قضیه اسپاگتی خوردن Will Smith که یه زمانی سم خالص هوش مصنوعی بود رو یادتونه؟ 🍝
این خروجی وحشتناک بالا با Flux 3 ساخته شده 👆
کار تیم bfl_ai هست و قشنگ نشون میده تو همین زمان کوتاه چقدر پیشرفت کردیم 🤖
🤖 راه ارتباط مستقیم با من 👈 @danidouen_bot
اگه کیفیت برات خیلی مهمه و محدودیت بودجه نداری، مدلت رو Seedance 2.5 انتخاب کن ✨
رو دستش در حال حاضر وجود نداره 🚀
با ریاکشن بگو خروجی کار چطور شده؟ 🤔
🤖 راه ارتباط مستقیم با من 👈 @danidouen_bot
یه ایده جذاب واسه چنلهای YouTube اینه که بری سراغ داستانهای معروفی مثه خرگوش و لاکپشت 🐢
خروجیش که با seedance ساخته شده رو تو همین ویدیوی بالا میتونی ببینی 👆
کافیه با AI براش تصویر بسازی، صدا روش بذاری و ادیتش کنی تا یه ویدیوی خفن واسه آپلود داشته باشی 🤖
فقط حتما قبلش قوانین مانیتایز یوتیوب رو برای هوش مصنوعی بخون که خیالت راحت بشه؛ زنده کردن این قصههای قدیمی با ابزارهای جدید یه میانبر سریع برای رسیدن به درآ…
🚀 ۱۷ کانال یوتیوب که واقعا AI یادت میدن
اگه نمیخوای بین هزاران ویدیوی تکراری بچرخی، این لیست رو سیو کن. از آموزش ساده و کاربردی تا اتوماسیون، کسبوکار و عمق فنی؛ برای هر هدفی یه گزینه خوب اینجاست 👇
💼 کسبوکار و آژانس
۱) Sabrina Ramonov — کسبوکار یکنفره و درآمدزایی با AI
۲) Ben AI — اتوماسیون واقعی و رشد آژانس
۳) Liam Ottley — ساخت و فروش AI Agent
۴) Dan Martell — سیستمسازی و رشد بدون حجم کار بیشتر
۵) Nick Sara…
❤44🫡11
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @dani_douen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GiG4D @gigs4d · 31,336 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
مهندس شاینا امیری | Shaina Amiri @shaina_amiri · 48,661 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
سبقت از تورم با فرشید فرخی @farshid_io · 305,173 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
درآمد دلاری از یوتیوب | مهدی زردکانلو @mzardkanlo · 30,663 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
فرکانس شکرگزاری با کریم قنبرزاده @karim_ghanbarzadee · 28,121 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دنی دوئن| کلاب ترمیناتور های هوش مصنوعی” (@dani_douen), 24,677 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dani_douen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.