Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,802–20,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 16:39
20,815
-33
9 Oct 2026, 18:56
20,848
-22
5 Oct 2026, 08:37
20,870
-30
29 Sept 2026, 13:22
20,900
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.75%
avg views ÷ 20,815 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
20 (15 June 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
2,809
Reactions total
41
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
57
90.5%
👏
3
4.76%
🏆
1
1.59%
🙏
1
1.59%
🤨
1
1.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💡 نکته خلاصه درباره «آیا هوش مصنوعی شغل ما را میگیرد؟»:
☑ کارهای تکراری در خطرند – هرچه یک کار قابلپیشبینیتر و تکراریتر باشد، امکان انجام آن با AI بیشتر است.
☑ ورود اطلاعات – ثبت، استخراج و دستهبندی اطلاعات میتواند تا حد زیادی خودکار شود.
☑ پشتیبانی ساده مشتری – پاسخ به سؤالات پرتکرار را دستیارهای هوشمند انجام میدهند.
☑ تولید محتوای ساده – کپشن، توضیحات محصول، خلاصهسازی و متنهای معمولی سریعتر با AI تولید …
💡 نکته خلاصه درباره «نسل جدید هوش مصنوعی؛ Astra و ChatGPT»:
☑ از چتبات تا دستیار هوشمند – AI فقط جواب نمیده؛ در انجام کارها هم کمک میکنه.
☑ درک تصویر – عکس و محیط اطراف رو میبینه و تحلیل میکنه.
☑ درک صدا – میتونه صدای شما رو دریافت و تحلیل کنه.
☑ تحلیل فایلها – گزارشها، اسناد و اطلاعات رو بررسی و خلاصه میکنه.
☑ کار با ویدئو – محتوای ویدئویی رو میتونه درک و تحلیل کنه.
☑ هوش مصنوعی چندوجهی – متن، تصویر، صدا …
🚨 بزرگترین اشتباه کسبوکارها این نیست که فروش ندارن...
بزرگترین اشتباه اینه که:
همه چیزشون به یک جا وابسته است! 😐
یک اتفاق...
یک تغییر...
یک محدودیت...
و ناگهان باید از صفر شروع کنند کسبوکارهای حرفهای اینطوری فکر نمیکنن.
اونها همیشه یک نقشه دوم دارن... 🗺️
یک مسیر دوم...
یک جامعه دوم...
یک بازار دوم...
🎯 چون میدونن:
کسی برنده آینده است که برای بدترین شرایط هم آماده باشه.
نه کسی که فقط امیدوار باشه همه چیز خو…
🔥 ۳ سال پیش اگر کسی بهت میگفت:
با یک گوشی و اینترنت میتونی کسبوکار راه بندازی...
شاید باورت نمیشد... 😅
اما امروز همه قبول دارن که شدنیه.
حالا من یک سوال دارم... 🤔
❓۳ سال دیگه مردم درباره چه چیزی خواهند گفت:
کاش زودتر شروع کرده بودم؟
💭
جالبه بدونی...
بیشتر ثروتها زمانی ساخته میشن که هنوز اکثریت مردم متوجه فرصت نشدن... 🚀
نه زمانی که همه فهمیدن!
⚠️ اکثر آدمها وقتی وارد یک فرصت میشن که:
📌 بازار شلوغ شده
📌 رقابت …
⭕فردا شب تو وبینار رایگان و آموزشی میخوام بهت یاد بدم چطوری از پلتفرم ها ایرانی و خارجی یک پایگاه درآمدی داشته باشی
✅یعنی اگر یک از پلتفرم ها قطع شد درآمد تو قطع نشه
یا کسب و کارت به چالش کشیده نشه
⛔الان نباید درآمد وابسته به یک پلتفرم باشه
باید روی چندین پلتفرم یک پایگاه درآمدی ایجاد کنی⛔
💢 اگه میخوای این روش رو یادبگیر و از چندین پلتفرم درآمد کسب کنی
از طریق لینک زیر ثبت نام کن که بتونی داخل وبینار شرکت کنی
وبین…
🧠 یک سوال...
اگر امروز از اول شروع میکردی و هیچ مخاطبی نداشتی...
هیچ پیجی نداشتی...
هیچ مشتریای نداشتی...
از کجا شروع میکردی؟ 🤔
‼️جالبه!! اکثر آدمها جواب این سوال رو ندارن.
چون بیشتر ما به روشهای قدیمی عادت کردیم...
در حالی که فرصتهای جدید معمولاً جایی هستن که هنوز شلوغ نشده...
👀 و پول همیشه قبل از شلوغ شدن بازار وارد میشه...
🚨 بزرگترین اشتباه کسبوکارها این نیست که مشتری ندارن...
بزرگترین اشتباه اینه که فکر میکنن شرایط چند سال پیش هنوز وجود داره.
❌ رفتار مشتری عوض شده
❌ مسیر خرید عوض شده
❌ ابزارها عوض شدن
اما خیلیها هنوز با نقشه قدیمی حرکت میکنن...
📍و مشکل اینجاست که با نقشه قدیمی نمیشه به مقصد جدید رسید.
📞 چند روز پیش با یک صاحب کسبوکار صحبت میکردم...
حرف عجیبی زد...
گفت:من از رقیبم بهترم...
محصولم بهتره...
قیمتم هم بهتره...
ولی درآمد اون داره بیشتر میشه!"😒
ازش پرسیدم چرا فکر میکنی این اتفاق افتاده؟
گفت:نمیدونم! اما من میدونستم...
رقیبش زودتر از بقیه فهمیده بود که بازار عوض شده...📈
بعضی آدمها وقتی بازار تغییر میکنه مقاومت میکنن...
بعضیها هم سوار موج میشن...
و معمولاً پول سمت گروه دوم میره. 💰
امشب هم تو وبینار بهت میگم که چطوری از هوش مصنوعی برای عملکرد بهتر در کسب و کارت استفاده کنی✅
یا چطوری ازش درآمد کسب کنی💸
برای شرکت در وبینار از طریق لینک زیر استفاده کن👇👇
https://behzadabbasi.com/competition/dpp
وقتی اسم هوش مصنوعی میآید، معمولا همه یاد چتجیپیتی و جمنای میافتند.
اما هوش مصنوعی فقط همینهاست؟🤔
قطعا نه! یکی از پرسروصداترین موضوعات این روزها، عوامل هوش مصنوعی هستند!💥
دیگر مثل چتجیپیتی فقط چت نمیکنید؛ هوش مصنوعی کارمند شماست و برایتان کار میکند👌
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @polsazi_abbasi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آموزش کسب درآمد دلاری از هوش مصنوعی @webmastermentor · 21,588 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پولسازی با هوشمصنوعی” (@polsazi_abbasi), 20,815 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polsazi_abbasi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.