28 measurements spanning 30 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,066–22,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 19:58
22,086
-37
3 Sept 2026, 19:17
22,123
-3
2 Sept 2026, 14:24
22,126
-3
1 Sept 2026, 13:25
22,129
-14
31 Aug 2026, 11:58
22,143
-7
30 Aug 2026, 10:08
22,150
-3
29 Aug 2026, 10:44
22,153
+22
28 Aug 2026, 11:27
22,131
+21
27 Aug 2026, 14:13
22,110
+8
26 Aug 2026, 10:56
22,102
-11
25 Aug 2026, 12:23
22,113
+3
24 Aug 2026, 14:04
22,110
+30
22 Aug 2026, 20:03
22,080
+1
21 Aug 2026, 11:47
22,079
-12
20 Aug 2026, 10:06
22,091
-7
19 Aug 2026, 08:44
22,098
-13
18 Aug 2026, 09:35
22,111
+34
17 Aug 2026, 10:46
22,077
-9
15 Aug 2026, 17:13
22,086
-16
14 Aug 2026, 06:57
22,102
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 22,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.361%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
68 (26 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
118,861
Reactions total
412
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
5m 49s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
603 reactions across 65 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
209
34.7%
❤
160
26.5%
🤯
47
7.79%
😁
37
6.14%
🤣
32
5.31%
😡
24
3.98%
💔
18
2.99%
😨
14
2.32%
👏
11
1.82%
👎
9
1.49%
🔥
9
1.49%
😱
7
1.16%
🤔
7
1.16%
🤡
6
0.995%
🍌
4
0.663%
😭
3
0.498%
❤🔥
2
0.332%
🆒
1
0.166%
🎃
1
0.166%
👌
1
0.166%
1 further kind
1
0.166%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 603 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 68 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AIPyth0n. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤖 مهمترین اخبار دنیای هوش مصنوعی | ۲ و ۳ سپتامبر ۲۰۲۶
🔥 OpenAI مدل Astra را وارد سطح «بحرانی» امنیت سایبری کرد
Astra در آزمایشها توانایی کشف آسیبپذیریهای ناشناخته و ساخت اکسپلویت برای آنها را نشان داده و OpenAI برای دسترسی به آن محدودیتهای ویژهای در نظر گرفته است.
🔗 Link
🧠 Anthropic مدلهای Fable 5.1 و Mythos 5.1 را منتشر کرد
Fable 5.1 روی کدنویسی و کارهای پژوهشی تمرکز دارد و Mythos 5.1 با دسترسی محدود بر…
اگر نمیخواهید در بازار کار آینده بیسواد بمانید، وقت آن است که با مشاغل جدید و جذاب دنیای هوش مصنوعی آشنا شوید.
AI Visual Designer:
طراحی کمپینهای تصویری و استتها (Assets).
AI Video Creator:
ساخت و تولید ویدیوهای عمومی با هوش مصنوعی.
AI Art Director:
کارگردانی و مدیریت پروژههای هنری.
Generative AI Designer:
انجام پروژههای گرافیکی با کمک ابزارهای AI.
AI Prompt Designer:
بهینهسازی و تنظیم پرامپتها برای مراحل پی…
با این تورم، خرید قسطی ایفون واقعاً میتونه منطقیتر از خرید نقدی باشه
مثلاً اگه بتونی یه گوشی رو روزی ۱۹۹ هزار تومان بخری، ارزش پولت کمتر از حالتی افت میکنه که چند ماه دیگه بخوای همون گوشی رو نقدی تهیه کنی
من خودم این مدل خرید رو بیشتر میپسندم؛ مخصوصاً برای آیفون
اینجا قیمت و شرایطش خوبه به نظرم :
@iphonedarsho
✦ Anthropic از Claude Fable 5.1 و Mythos 5.1 رونمایی کرد
Anthropic میگه مدلهای جدیدش، پیشرفتهترین مدلهای این شرکت برای کدنویسی، تحقیق و کارهای دانشمحور هستن.
Fable 5.1 در Terminal-Bench 4.0 امتیاز ۵۵.۸٪ گرفته؛ در حالی که Fable 5 امتیاز ۴۲٪ داشت. در Terminal-Bench-Science هم به ۵۲.۶٪ رسیده؛ یعنی بیش از دو برابر نسل قبلی.
این مدل علاوه بر عملکرد بهتر، با تلاش کمتر هم میتونه به نتایج مشابه یا بهتر برسه. هزین…
شرکت دایسون اخیراً یک مسواک جدید با قابلیتهای هوش مصنوعی و یک دوربین ماکرو با وضوح 100,000 پیکسل عرضه کرده که قیمت آن 499 دلار هست.
#هوش_مصنوعی #AI #ChatGPT #Artificial_Intelligence #Agent #Claude #Meta
┏━━━━━━━━┓
〓 @AIPyth0n
┗━━━━━━━━┛
🔴 مهم: انقلابی در کسب درآمد با هوش مصنوعی
🚀 اپلیکیشن ایرانیای رونمایی شد که تمام مسیر را از پیداکردن ایده تا جذب مشتری و فروش داخل یک سیستم انجام میدهد!
دیگر لازم نیست بین دهها ابزار و آموزش مختلف سردرگم شوید؛ این اپلیکیشن با کمک هوش مصنوعی:
✅ مسیر درآمدی و پیشنهاد قابلفروش را میسازد
✅ محتوا و مسیر جذب مشتری را آماده میکند
✅ پیگیری مشتری و سیستم فروش را راهاندازی میکند
❌ بدون نیاز به مهارت یا کسبوکار قبل…
📊 درآمد تبلیغات ChatGPT به 1 میلیارد دلار رسید
درآمد سالانه تبلیغات ChatGPT کمتر از ۲۰۰ روز پس از راهاندازی به حدود ۱ میلیارد دلار رسیده؛ در حالی که OpenAI تنها ۶ هفته بعد از شروع تبلیغات، به درآمد ۱۰۰ میلیون دلاری رسیده بود.
OpenAI برای سال ۲۰۲۶، درآمد ۲.۴ میلیارد دلاری از تبلیغات را پیشبینی کرده است. البته عملکرد ماههای ابتدایی کمی کندتر از نرخ رشد فعلی بوده و همین موضوع میتواند رسیدن به این هدف را دشوارتر ک…
مصاحبههای شغلی آنلاین؛ قربانی جدید تقلب با هوش مصنوعی
گسترش دیپفیک، تقلب با هوش مصنوعی و استفاده از افراد جایگزین باعث شده شرکتها در احراز هویت متقاضیان با مشکل مواجه شوند.
حالا بعضی کارفرماها از کارجوها میخواهند در طول مصاحبه ویدیویی حرکتهای مشخصی مثل عبور دادن دست از جلوی صورت انجام دهند تا از واقعی بودن فرد مطمئن شوند.
به نظر میرسد با پیشرفت هوش مصنوعی، احراز هویت در استخدام آنلاین به چالش جدیتری تبدیل خ…
کدوم هوش مصنوعی ویدیو ساز بهتر فارسی صحبت میکنه؟
توی این تست، چند مدل هوش مصنوعی از نظر توانایی صحبت کردن به زبان فارسی با هم مقایسه شدن
رتبهبندی نهایی تست:
Omni Flash
Grok
Flux
H3
Veo
اگه برات کیفیت فارسیگویی، تلفظ و طبیعی بودن صدای AI مهمه، این تست میتونه جالب باشه.
┏━━━━━━━━┓
〓 @AIPyth0n
┗━━━━━━━━┛
چرا ۷ پژوهشگر OpenAI با هم از این شرکت جدا شدن؟
دنیلا آمودی، رئیس و یکی از بنیانگذاران Anthropic، میگه این افراد در واقع از OpenAI «فرار» نکردن؛ بلکه میخواستن هوش مصنوعی رو با یک نگاه متفاوت به آینده این فناوری بسازن.
هر ۷ نفر، از جمله دنیلا و داریو آمودی، یه دغدغه مشترک داشتن:
میخواستن ایمنی، مسئولیتپذیری و تأثیرات بلندمدت هوش مصنوعی از همون اول، بخش اصلی سازمانی باشه که قراره بسازن.
راهحلشون چی بود؟
همهچی…
❤4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @AIPyth0n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کالی لینوکس | Kali linux | ترفند | کامپیوتر | تکنولوژی @kali_linuxxx · 75,612 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
جزوه دانشجویی @jozveh_daneshjoyi · 33,075 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
زندگی با کتاب @tekhob · 35,693 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
هوش مصنوعی | AI @AI_University · 32,541 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
عصر گویش | هوش مصنوعی @asrgooyeshpardaz · 100,360 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
آموزش زبان انگلیسی روان @eng_ravan · 54,306 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
کتاب & اخبار دانشجویی @ketabkhaneh_daneshjoyi · 103,150 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
منبع کتاب و جزوه دانشگاهی @PDFDANESHGHAHY · 35,953 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
📚کتاب دانشگاهی📚 @ketab_University · 31,996 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 9 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“• AI & Python •” (@AIPyth0n), 22,086 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIPyth0n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.