Trader signals RU pinned a photo

Channel
Trader signals RU
@daytrader_signals
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,554subscribers
-510 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001470500060 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daytrader_signals |
| Description | Бесплатные сигналы для трейдеров CScalp News : @cscalpofficial Сигналы МосБиржа: @signals_moex Мемы для трейдеров: @Memesfortraders Бесплатное обучение: @propstart TradersDiaries: @Free_Diary_and_Screener Поддержка: @CScalp_support_bot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daytrader_signals |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 43,554 | -10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 43,564 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 43,579 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 43,599 | -21 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 43,620 | -38 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 43,658 | -21 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 43,679 | -27 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 43,706 | -31 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 43,737 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:48 | 43,749 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 43,757 | -21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 43,778 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 43,782 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 43,788 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 43,792 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 43,807 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 43,820 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 43,836 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 43,847 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 43,855 | first reading |
Engagement
142 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.75%
- avg views ÷ 43,554 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,500
- 71 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.316%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 75
- of 142 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 142 (26 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 177,687 |
| Reactions total | 432 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈29,400
- Videos
- ≈68
- Links
- ≈41,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
821 reactions across 101 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 536 | 65.3% | |
| 🔥 | 185 | 22.5% | |
| 🤔 | 36 | 4.38% | |
| 👀 | 35 | 4.26% | |
| 😁 | 29 | 3.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 821 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 136 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @daytrader_signals. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 142 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🚀Бесплатный интенсив от ScalpingTradingSchool : “Типы трендов” 28 сентября | 18:30 (Мск) | 3 урока Пока большинство новичков теряют депозит на контртренде, профи зарабатывают на понятной математике и движении рынка. 🔥 Спикер: Владислав Черемисин - основатель ScalpingTradingSchool Чему вы научитесь за 3 урока: День 1: Анализ крипторынка и крупных участников, за которыми нужно идти. День 2: Торговые стратегии для р…
👍2😁1
Что "двигалось" за последние 24 часа Bybit USDT Perpetual 🔥 54.4% FOLKSUSDT 80.6% 4STOCKUSDT 43.1% 4USDT Binance USDⓈ-M 🔥 53.1% DRIFTUSDT 53.1% CHRUSDT 47.7% ONEUSDT OKX USDT-M USDC-M 🔥 64.3% MUBARAK-USDT-SWAP 34.5% ONE-USDT-SWAP 34.5% MET-USDT-SWAP Подпишитесь на Сообщество здесь. CScalp | WebCScalp | Дневник трейдера
MUBARAK формирует сильный сетап на пробой ключевого уровня с повышенным объёмом. Цена находится в выраженном восходящем движении и уже несколько раз подходила к области 0.0733, где ранее появлялся продавец. Каждый предыдущий тест заканчивался реакцией вниз, но покупатель продолжал возвращать цену обратно к уровню. Интересует пробой 0.0733 с последующим закреплением выше. Не просто фитиль над уровнем, а полноценный вы…
👍14😁4👀1🤔1
В данный момент SYN продолжает восстановление после глубокой коррекции и вплотную подходит к ключевой зоне сопротивления. Цена удерживается выше локальной базы, структура остается лонговой за счет серии повышающихся минимумов, а текущий импульс показывает готовность актива к тесту и возможному пробою ближайших максимумов. Дополнительно на это указывает уверенное удержание цены вблизи уровня 0.23$. Рассматриваю лонг …
🔥9👍3🤔1
UNI по активу формируется классический сетап на пробой и повторный тест верхней границы консолидации. Цена продолжительное время находилась внутри широкого диапазона, а область 9.30-9.53 выступала его верхней границей. Каждый предыдущий подход сюда встречал продавца и возвращал цену обратно внутрь накопления. Сейчас ситуация изменилась. Если область 9.30-9.53 удерживается сверху, а цена после отката снова начинает фо…
👍3🔥1
BCH формирует лонговая структуру с последовательным возвратом к уровням, от которых раньше рынок получал сильную реакцию продавца. После снижения в район 215-220 покупатель полностью перехватил локальную инициативу и вернул BCH к первой серьёзной зоне сопротивления. Именно эта область сейчас является ближайшей точкой принятия решения. Исторически район 274 уже выступал сопротивлением. Сейчас цена снова пришла сюда по…
🔥1
В данный момент LIT продолжает восстановление после глубокой коррекции и вплотную подходит к ключевой зоне сопротивления. Цена удерживается выше локальной базы, структура остается лонговой за счет серии повышающихся минимумов, а текущий импульс показывает готовность актива к тесту и возможному пробою ближайших максимумов. Дополнительно на это указывает уверенное удержание цены вблизи уровня 5.25$. Рассматриваю лонг …
👀4🔥4👍3
Актив ONE после локального роста начал коррекционное движение, в процессе которого снова поджимаемся к отчетливым уровням поддержки в несколько подходов, за которыми есть стоп-лоссы покупателей. Медвежья структура указывает на доминацию продавцов и на возможное продолжение нисходящего тренда. Сигналом на вход будет являться: формирование накопления вблизи уровней и появление активных продаж книге ордеров. Цели с част…
🔥10👀2👍1
Актив LTC длительное время формирует сильнейшие локальные уровни сопротивления со множеством подходов и большим количеством стоп-лоссов продавцов. Локально образовался бычий паттерн, сжимающий цену вдоль трендовой с помощью покупателей. Ожидаю формирование накопления вблизи каскада из горизонтальных уровней и на ускорении исполнении сделок в книге ордеров импульсный пробой. Цели на закрытие: 62.12 - 62.73 - 63.01
👍8🤔4😁2👀1
#BTC 5m Биткоин продолжает движение в рамках восходящего канала, однако зона $81 300–81 700 остаётся областью повышенного предложения. Ожидаю локальную коррекцию с последовательным снятием ликвидности ниже $81 000 и тестом поддержки $80 450–80 530. Именно оттуда рассматриваю потенциальное возобновление роста к $81 900. Пока цена удерживает нижнюю границу канала, бычья структура сохраняется. Потеря $80 450 поставит…
👍10🔥5
#ZEC 5m Цена продолжает двигаться внутри нисходящего канала, однако в районе $1455–1465 сформировалась сильная зона интереса с незакрытым IMB. Ожидаю повторный тест этой области и реакцию покупателей. Вход рассматриваю после подтверждения удержания $1463. Стоп — ниже $1442, поскольку закрепление под уровнем сломает сценарий. Первые цели находятся в районе $1508–1523, основная — $1537. Потенциал сделки хороший, но д…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @daytrader_signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Cryptoinvest1207 · 13514 postsИнвестиции и заработок
@NeroManiYak · 412 postsCentrum_Trading
@Centrum_trading · 257 postsDStrade. Analytics
@DStradeProcess · 222 posts𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗼𝘃𝗡𝗲𝘁 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘
@netstopov · 592 postsBondar&CScalp
@cscalpofficial · 14,5711 postTX | Trading
@evolution_futures · 141 postLIMITLESS trade
@limitless_trade · 641 postSparrow is not a Bull
@scalping_05 · 991 postBTC prediction
@wwwbtcprediction · 41 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@cscalpofficial · 14,57112 postsNEWS TradersDiaries.com
@Free_Diary_and_Screener · 5,12410 postsProp-Broker
@prop_broker · 1,6093 postsSouth Spy
@SouthAmigos · 1043 postsМемы от трейдеров
@Memesfortraders · 2,6072 posts@feuturespda_bot
@futurespda498 · 21 postInvest Chats | Каналы по инвестициям и трейдингу | Чаты по трейдингу
@investing_chats · 681 postsignals lib
@signalslib · 31 postTradersDiaries.com EN
@TradeJournalfree · 4181 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@digahkaaaa · 41,690#1
@ScalpersAlmshouse · 5,423#2
@signals_moex · 15,154#3
@taiptrade · 7,000#4
@anis_trade · 2,137#5
@bittraders111 · 5,855#6
@topslivs · 12,095#7
@tradertrend · 60,704#8
@CryyptooGenn · 1,801#9
@COINSCANRRC · 4,998#10
@RuslanDanilovCrypto · 24,450#11
@markettwits · 336,496#12
@crypto_hd · 132,434#13
@breidatrade · 8,931#14
@invest_zonaa · 917,113#15
@rdnscalp · 32,146#16
@baks_max · 44,521#17
@proboyscalp · 21,738#18
@nwsmkr · 21,233#19
@wintrading_alerts · 3,979#20
@mr_mozart · 129,572#21
@Scalpich · 6,123#22
@SANCHO_DT · 65,589#23
@ikigaimain · 98,290#24
@dtsvet03 · 7,553#25
@LLvcryptoo · 482 (as read 28 August 2026)#26
@Coin_Post · 291,333#27
@x1024scalp · 7,790#28
@cscalpofficial · 14,571#29
@ssttaannookk · 8,477#30
@aleksandrnesterenkomvp · 1,328#31
@trade001k · 107,044#32
@cryptoattack24 · 56,173#33
@pifagortrade · 85,453#34
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418#35
@MOLLYtrading · 3,636#36
@broketra · 1,792#37
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,702#38
@gshYMvxwtns5Yzlk · 4,150#39
@Dnevnik10x · 6,348#40
@thebagaisakov · 9,797#41
@forklog · 92,345#42
@DigashLive · 9,095#43
@Free_Diary_and_Screener · 5,124#44
@fuckbulll · 139#45
@microcheliik · 5,532#46
@ScalpSectaLIVE · 4,077#47
@KingofTilt · 57,319#48
@BinanceCryptoWallHack · 2,107#49
@specu1ator · 2,302#50
@polunintrade7 · 525,189#51
@bluefutures · 3,962#52
@RASTERtrade · 5,592#53
@uiartemzvezdin · 75,931#54
@trading_001k · 28,525#55
@falconinvestors · 82,295#56
@incrypted · 108,728#57
@whitelist · 4,610#58
@PremiumTradingru · 2,221#59
@andryuninthelegend · 18,509#60
@Alkhimov_Vlog · 1,564#61
@cryptodaily · 85,610#62
@trend_gen · 55,259#63
@scalpvision · 1,029#64
@wyckoffcompany · 68,647#65
@binance_ru · 97,175#66
@ArturICT67 · 22#67
@cicap_official · 3,336#68
@DeCenter · 1,823,722#69
@logcap_prop · 11,970#70
@i_speculatorX · 6,835#71
@dogs · 7,065,215#72
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#73
@notcoin · 8,643,687#74
@BinanceLiquidations · 180,620#75
@market_shock · 8,324#76
@slezisatoshi · 124,064#77
@lineralerts · 4,419#78
@vataga_trading · 4,855#79
@akimaqu · 1,466#80
@guru_pumpsdumps · 11,045#81
@whale_alert_io · 300,889#82
@Video_archive0508 · 5,255#83
@CryptoMafiaScalp · 1,871#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@screeners_info · 21,882
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@digahkaaaa · 41,690
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
@igorcryptotrader · 30,090
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
@RuslanDanilovCrypto · 24,450
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
@dmitry_shukin · 52,415
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
@rdnscalp · 32,146
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
@uiartemzvezdin · 75,931
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
@baks_max · 44,521
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
@criptopatolog · 80,005
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trader signals RU” (@daytrader_signals), 43,554 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daytrader_signals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.