Там, где солнце палит ярче.
Блог о самых ярких событиях в Западной Африке.
Многие упоминаемые группировки запрещены в РФ, канал не занимается пропагандой. а исследует их.
По рекламе: @Evg9_manager, @Vasseekk
Или напрямую @mmmwatermelon
Created
2 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,486–36,700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 02:36
36,530
+10
16 Sept 2026, 14:19
36,520
-3
14 Sept 2026, 21:38
36,523
-13
13 Sept 2026, 08:00
36,536
-23
11 Sept 2026, 08:17
36,559
+14
8 Sept 2026, 11:38
36,545
+34
5 Sept 2026, 03:00
36,511
-22
3 Sept 2026, 10:57
36,533
-21
2 Sept 2026, 03:24
36,554
-9
31 Aug 2026, 23:49
36,563
-8
30 Aug 2026, 21:53
36,571
+8
29 Aug 2026, 20:54
36,563
-4
28 Aug 2026, 23:25
36,567
-15
28 Aug 2026, 01:15
36,582
-11
26 Aug 2026, 23:03
36,593
-5
25 Aug 2026, 22:17
36,598
-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:08
36,603
-20
23 Aug 2026, 11:18
36,623
-14
21 Aug 2026, 19:54
36,637
-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:03
36,640
first reading
Engagement
150 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 36,530 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,220
84 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.838%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
150 (31 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
522,130
Reactions total
4,374
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,520
Videos
≈1,610
Links
≈2,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
1m 17s
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,998 reactions across 145 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,681
29.8%
❤
2,245
24.9%
🔥
1,246
13.8%
🤬
908
10.1%
😁
829
9.21%
🙏
362
4.02%
🤔
270
3.00%
👎
201
2.23%
custom 5307707020890100069
162
1.80%
🥰
48
0.533%
😱
46
0.511%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,377 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 150 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @departamente. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 150 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇲🇱 Из речи президента Мали Ассими Гойты, произнесенной по случаю 66-й годовщины провозглашения независимости.
«В этом контексте борьба с нестабильностью и вооружёнными террористическими группировками будет ещё более усилена. Мали адаптирует свою оборонную политику и оборонный аппарат к любым формам угроз, принимая стратегию, основанную на проактивных военных операциях на местах, глубоких институциональных и структур…
🔥 Кофе с собой, обеды не дома, подписки вслепую - 13 500 ₽/мес. В никуда. За год - 162 000 ₽. А могли бы работать и превратиться в ~3,5 млн за 10 лет.
Разница только в том, где деньги: в стаканчике или на брокерском счёте.
Канал «PN - просто о важном» - это честная арифметика без воды:
📌 Подушка безопасности: сколько именно держать в 2026
📌 Кредитки: почему минимальный платёж = кабала
📌 Досрочка ипотеки: когда она…
🇲🇱 Генштаб Мали заявил о ликвидации иностранных боевиков в Диуре
ВС Мали выпустили официальное коммюнике о боях в районе н.п. Диура.
Во-первых, в Генштабе заявили об эвакуации двух рот из района города, при этом о возвращении или усилении гарнизона не говорится, чем косвенно подтверждают версию, что база была покинута. К тому же есть видео сожженых окрестностей.
В то же время масштабная воздушно-наземная операция…
🇲🇱 Боевики JNIM сообщили о падении дрона «Молния-2» в регионе Сегу.
Впервые отмечается применение этого вида БпЛА в малийском конфликте. А с утра БД опубликовали надпись на подобном дроне с надписью Fuck Azawad.
🏇 Departamente
Telegram / MAX
🇳🇪🇸🇩 В Нигере расставляют приоритеты: Тчиани встретился с суданским послом и передал послание президенту Аль-Бурхану, представляющему Суверенный Совет Судана.
Нигер продолжает опираться на антиэмиратскую ось — сначала восстановление связей с западной Ливией, потом с Алжиром, а теперь с правительством Судана, которое ведет войну против, предположительно, поддерживаемых из Абу-Даби «Сил Быстрого Реагирования».
🏇 Depa…
🇲🇱🇺🇸🇺🇦 Свои же мешают
Французы предупреждают американцев о Мали
Парижский аналитический центр The Africa Report выкатил очередной материал о вероятном развёртывании США в Мали. Правда, французы подошли к вопросу с другой стороны — украинские инструкторы, оказывается, противоречат их интересам.
Пока в Вашингтоне пытаются восстановить контакты с малийским правительством и договориться о проведении собственной «малень…
📝Удерживать нельзя оставить📝
а может поставить запятую после второго слова?
Сколько бы ни было нападений в Мали, одна точка не дает покоя боевикам и становится мишенью раз за разом — Диура.
Её атаковали в 2019 радикалы, в 2023 сепаратисты, в 2025 году вновь нагрянули исламисты, как и пару дней назад. С каждым разом для правительственных сил это оказывалось все большей кровавой баней.
А такая судьба у этого опорник…
🇲🇱 «Не читайте до обеда советских газет».
Западные СМИ и аналитические центры выкатили совместное расследование о войне беспилотников в Мали. Jeune Afrique, Bellingcat и The Sentry синхронно рассказывают о гражданских жертвах, российских командирах и нарушениях международного права.
Правда вот за громкими заголовками в духе «Они видели детей, они все-таки стреляли», скрывается куда более скромная доказательная база…
🇲🇱 Вчера боевики в соцсетях заявили об очередных «преступлениях» малийских сил — якобы армейцы сожгли мотоциклы мирного населения.
Но чуть позже появилась информация, что, возможно, за атакой стоит JNIM, которые взяли ответственность за подрыв патруля ГАТИА.
Информацию, что это формирования туарегов опровергли проправительственные аккаунты.
🏇 Departamente
Telegram / MAX
🇳🇬 Боевики «Боко Харам» опровергли сообщения о тайном перемирии с нигерийским правительством.
В начале сентября появилась информация о подобного рода соглашении, что послужило передышкой правительство для борьбы с ЗАПИГ.
🏇 Departamente
Telegram / MAX
🤬13❤2👍2🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @departamente. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@departamente named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Африканская инициатива 🌍 @africaninitiative · 65,152 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Directorate 4 @directorate4 · 77,481 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
Африканский Корпус @corpsafrica · 42,727 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Белые дяди в Африке🌴 @wagner_group2022 · 122,616 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
جرائم المليشيات @jraimalmlyshyat · 40,853 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 1 September 2026
Naïm Infos @NaimInfos · 24,529 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
Bouba Fané news @boubafane · 23,314 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 September 2026
5 МГ @KGV5mg · 35,782 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
Hergon prime @hergonprime225 · 71,925 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 19 August 2026
КАСПЕР 🇧🇾 @kasper_mus · 69,353 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
Mali Emploi🇲🇱🇲🇱 @Mali_Emploi · 28,438 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 September 2026
Объявления о работе в Африке @bold_advertising_agency · 43,667 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Ibrahima Maiga @ibrahimamaigabf · 167,381 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Info Source @ibou_sy2 · 56,495 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
Африка @africamain · 40,374 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Голос арабов | Иран США война @arabiasocialism · 23,500 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
Maimouna Camara (La Guepe News) @laguepequipique · 21,770 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
Stratégies Mondiales @Strategiescontinentales · 35,681 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
GeoRadar @georadarinfo · 24,000 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
LEGEOGRAPHE221 @legeographe221 · 65,872 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
War Noir @war_noir · 53,378 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
𝐀𝐄𝐒 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐔 🚨 @InfosAes · 54,266 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Departamente” (@departamente), 36,530 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/departamente.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.