π REK reached 7.14X after @Fuddles_Ceo's call π π View call | π DS | π Sect App
β€βπ₯12β€7π₯7π6π₯°4π2π―2

Channel
@fuddles_studio_calls
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
37,390subscribers
+16,757 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002375492663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fuddles_studio_calls |
| Description | NFA / DYOR β Good luck. π«‘ π© Info & updates: @Fuddles_Ceo β οΈ Payments ONLY to @Fuddles_Ceo. Anyone else is a SCAM β your risk. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fuddles_studio_calls |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 37,390 | +4,568 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 32,822 | -274 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 33,096 | -217 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 33,313 | +2,928 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 30,385 | -360 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 30,745 | -224 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 30,969 | -187 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:05 | 31,156 | +351 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:44 | 30,805 | +1,072 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 29,733 | -136 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 29,869 | -229 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 30,098 | -112 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 30,210 | -44 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 30,254 | -385 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 30,639 | -3,213 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 33,852 | -9,881 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 43,733 | +13,792 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 29,941 | -359 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 30,300 | -1,647 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 31,947 | first reading |
258 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 116 of 119 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 258 (4 August 2026 β 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 705,292 |
| Reactions total | 10,493 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 22 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
33,709 reactions across 250 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 5,798 | 17.2% | |
| π₯ | 5,769 | 17.1% | |
| β€ | 5,752 | 17.1% | |
| π | 5,722 | 17.0% | |
| π | 4,267 | 12.7% | |
| π₯° | 1,394 | 4.14% | |
| π― | 1,320 | 3.92% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1,308 | 3.88% | |
| π€© | 1,222 | 3.63% | |
| π | 1,152 | 3.42% | |
| π’ | 2 | 0.006% | |
| β‘ | 1 | 0.003% | |
| π | 1 | 0.003% | |
| π | 1 | 0.003% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 251 of the 258 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 33,709 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 258 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π REK reached 7.14X after @Fuddles_Ceo's call π π View call | π DS | π Sect App
β€βπ₯12β€7π₯7π6π₯°4π2π―2
This project is still doing small numbers but theyβve been cooking hard. They just built a whole world for AI agents bring your agent in, meet the residents, work together and actually build things inside the city. Also hearing theyβre starting to get support from some serious infrastructure teams behind the scenes. ca : 0xc839A88A05B231515a82c71EE97b4F18973C1340 thenation.city/city https://x.com/visitnation/staβ¦
β€βπ₯17π―16π₯16β€15π₯°14π13π11
$AGRIPPA CA: 0x82eF09793c78f7CB6a2B6696fcdCA8E1c3581e18 Fresh setup worth keeping an eye on. Momentum is building, and this could get interesting if buyers continue stepping in. DYOR β NFA.
π20π―19β€βπ₯14π₯14π₯°13π12β€8
π¦ DUCKED ($DUCKED) You didn't get rugged... you got DUCKED. ππ¦ Every great meme starts with a laugh, but the strongest communities turn memes into movements. $DUCKED is building a community that believes in organic growth, strong holders, and unstoppable momentum. π Community-first mindset π Diamond hands over paper hands π Growing a global flock of believers β‘ Powered by meme culture and Web3 innovation π Built foβ¦
β€βπ₯7π3π―2π₯2β€1π1π1
π HUB reached 9.35X after @Fuddles_Ceo's call π π View call | π DS | π Sect App
π₯°16π15β€βπ₯12π―11β€10π9π₯8
swappy Buy! π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ π° 0.10 ETH ($267.57) πͺ 453,530 swappy π·οΈ Price: $0.0005903 πΌ Mkt Cap: $590,276 π 0x5512...17cd β¬οΈ Position: New! π₯ #8 TRENDING Tx | Chart | Web | X | Trending
π₯°3π₯2β€1β€βπ₯1π1π1π―1
Second runner 4nianvQxSS5HEtE3fdWe6vyzhuThBEPmQJS8zYZRpump
π12π₯°12β€βπ₯11π₯11π9β€8π―8
$PATRYCZEK β QUICK RESEARCH Chain: Solana Launch: Pump.fun β PumpSwap MC: ~$50K Liquidity: ~$18K Holders: ~460 Volume: ~$100K+ Narrative: $PATRYCZEK is a Solana meme project built around the viral AI character Patryczek β an AI kid portrayed as living a millionaire lifestyle, flying planes and causing chaos. The project claims 70M+ TikTok views and 16.6M+ likes, giving it an existing social-media narrative to builβ¦
π₯15β€βπ₯12π12π10β€9π―7π₯°6
ππ¨πππππ¦ π¦π§π¨πππ’ πππππ¦ pinned Β«π₯$RSRV 5x (14.1x from VIP) From 40.7K βοΈ 321.6K within 46mΒ»
π₯$RSRV 5x (14.1x from VIP) From 40.7K βοΈ 321.6K within 46m
π―18π₯18π15β€13π₯°13β€βπ₯12π12
$RSRV β¬οΈ
π₯35β€βπ₯33π₯°30π28π―27π25β€24
$STAMP just added another layer to the Zcash meta new tokens launched through the platform are now automatically paired with $ZEC. and the team is working on custom $STAMP pairings next. more launches β more $ZEC liquidity β more volume flowing in if they get the $STAMP pairing structure right, this could add a serious new flywheel to the project. still early on this one.
π₯27π₯°27π26β€20
Showing the 12 most recent of 258 posts we hold for @fuddles_studio_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@fuddles_studio_calls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ¨πππππ¦ π¦π§π¨πππ’ πππππ¦β (@fuddles_studio_calls), 37,390 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuddles_studio_calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.