Channel
@ghalaam99
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,312subscribers
+294 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001098918715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghalaam99 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 31 October 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghalaam99 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 7,312 | +8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 7,304 | +19 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 7,285 | +63 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 7,222 | +20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 7,202 | +20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 7,182 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 7,181 | +74 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 7,107 | +20 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 7,087 | +41 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 7,046 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 7,039 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 7,022 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,018 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 7,018 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,555 reactions across 35 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,776 | 69.5% | |
| 👍 | 570 | 22.3% | |
| 👏 | 176 | 6.89% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 0.548% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 0.47% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.274% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,811 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اگر خدا روزی می دهد پس چرا آفریقایی ها از فقر می میرند؟؟ ➖➖➖➖➖ ✍🏻 خدا ارزشمندترین معادنش را زیر پاي این آفریقائیان گذاشت، دیگران آمدند و ظلم کردند؛ خدایي که نعمت داد متهم به ظلم شد، ظالم را هم تبرئه کردند چه قضاوتِ ناحقٌي... Mysterious Mineral from Earth's Mantle Discovered in South African Diamond مواد معدني مرموزي از جبه زمین در الماس آفریقاي جنوبي کشف شد ═════┅┄ 📝 چرا ثروت آفریقا،باعث ثروتمندي آفریقایيها نم…
❤51👍7👏3👎2
اگر خدا روزی می دهد چرا آفریقائیان فقیر هستند ؟؟ ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ❶ ظلم ظالم است؛ به خدا چه ربطی دارد؟ اگر کسی اموال شما را غصب کند مگر خدا فرمان داده؟ ❷انسان برای امتحان شدن آفریده شده؛ بنابراین حتی ظالم هم نباید بزور سلب اختیار شود الّذِي خَلق الْمَوتَ وَالْحياةَ ليَبْلوكُم(ملك) ❸ظالمان هم در این دنیا مهلتی دارند که باید به سرآید؛ و اگر خدا بخاطر ظلم گناهکاران در این دنیا تقاص کند سنگ روی سنگ بند نمیشود که: ولَو یُؤاخ…
❤60👍13👏3
منکرین حدیث و قرانیون در مواجه با آیات قران چگونه عمل می کنند ؟! پاسخی کوتاه و قرانی 🔎 بدون حدیث امکان فهم قرآن و تفسیرش غیرممکن می شود، تا جایی که حتی «روش نماز و تعداد رکعات نماز و جزئیات حج و زکات و جهاد و حیات پیامبر اسلام» غیرممکن می شود ... 🎙 دانش پشابادی
❤43👏12👎2👍1
این اسلام اون اسلام نیست ... چرا در طی ۱۴۰۰ سال اصلا اسلامی دیده نمیشه ؟!؟ ✏️ پاسخی کوتاه و البته متفاوت به اینکه اسلام کجا و چگونه پیاده می شود ... 🎙 دانش پشابادی
👍50❤21👏4👎1
🖥 خروجی خلاصه ی «هوش مصنوعی» از مقاله ی تمدن اسلامی که پیشتر نوشتم
❤42
🎧 ۳- همخوانی مدارج السالکین: سخن دربارهٔ إیاك نعبد وإیاك نستعین 📋 مباحث مطرح شده: مدار بیماریهای دل بر دو اصل میچرخد - آنچه فساد قصد و نیت به آن بستگی دارد - کسانیکه هدفشان خوب است اما انتخابِ وسایلشان برای رسیدن به هدف اشتباه است - دو بیماری بزرگ دل - سوره فاتحه همچنین درمان جسم است - شرح ایاک نعبد و ایاک نستعین - توکل - چرا اول «ایاک نعبد» آمده و سپس «ایاک نستعین»؟ - مردم در عبادت و استعانت بر چهار گروه هستن…
❤43🔥1
📺 پایان حرفۀ یک کشیش مدت زیادی بود که ویدئوهایی از یک کشیش ایرانی در فضای مجازی دستبهدست میشد. در این فرصت به سطح علمی او میپردازیم و به چند شبهه که دربارۀ اسلام مطرح کرده است پاسخ میدهیم. مقدمه 00:00 شاهکار کشیش در نقد ترجمۀ الهیقمشهای 02:06 آیا سیوطی قائل به تحریف قرآن است؟ 03:44 معنای ﴿الصمد﴾ چیست؟ 05:56 آیا قرآن دربارۀ شرک مسیحیان اشتباه کرده است؟! 12:44 در یوتوب، با کیفیت دلخواه تماشا کنید #ویدئو _____…
❤39👍4
📝 چند نکته ای درباره ی سوال پرسیدن لطفا لطفا گوش بدید و رعایت کنید ☺️🌹
❤35👍3👏3
دین های انستاگرامی ➖ ساختن یک «خدا و دین» تقلبی بنام خدای اسلام و القای تفکرات مذموم و مسموم 🎙 دانش پشابادی
👍50❤16👏5👎1
ادراک نه برای واقعیت بلکه برای بقا این سخن یعنی در واقع هدف مغز شما حقیقت نیست بلکه بقاست و اگر دانش شما بهچیزی دست پیدا کرد انچیز لزوما درست نیست فقط آن دانش باعث زنده ماندن و ادامه ی شما بوده ➖ پیشتر مقاله ای در نقد رویکرد طبیعت گرایان با شرط پذیرش فرگشت (با خوانش نئوداروینیرم) نوشتم. البته تاکنون هم هیچ فردی نتوانسته چنین خطا و تناقضی رو حل کنه یا حداقل من ندیدم قبلا هم درخواست مناظره کردم لیکن هیچ فردی حاضر…
❤38👍3
🖥 طنزی از نژاپرستان با قومیت های مختلف؛ هیچ ایرانی مسلمان نیست و هیچ مسلمانی ایرانی نیست و یا بعضا با شعار تو اول ایرانی هستی یا مسلمان؟! 📝 قومیت اجباری ولی باور اختیاری است، قومیت بر انسان جبر شده ولی در انتخاب عقیده مخیر شدیم ➖ هیچ گونه منطقی وجود ندارد که اولویت بندی را تعیین کند و ما ملزم به چنین چهارچوبی نیستیم چونکه اصولا هیچ ارتباطی در اولویت بندی این نگرش وجود نداره ✏️ یک ایرانی و اسپانیایی و امریکایی و …
❤68👍17👏3
به این حجم از پوچگرایی بیخدایان توجه کنید که انسان را از کرم توی اقیانوس هم پایین تر می آورد ➖➖➖➖➖ ➖ما نه اشرف هستیم و نه مخلوق؛ ما حاصل یک فرآیند آشوبناک و «بی هدف» هستیم؛ در کنار هزاران هزار محصول دیگر. ما فقط یک گونه ی زیستی هستیم در جایگاهی مشابه با ٫کرم پهن اقیانوس و یا دانه ی گندم٫. هر چند شاید آنها مفیدتر هم باشند 📝 مطالب بالا اخرین تحقیقات علمی طبیعت گریی خالی از رویکرد دینی است. شما هیچ نوع کرامت و ارزش …
❤38👍8👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @ghalaam99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ghalaam99 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قلم های نافذ /در رد الحاد/” (@ghalaam99), 7,312 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghalaam99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.