Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pezhvaak | پژواک

Channel

Pezhvaak | پژواک

@pezhvaak_ch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,335subscribers

+677 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509915410
TypeChannel
Username@pezhvaak_ch
Descriptionپژواک، کوششی فردی برای روشنگری پیرامون دین است. برای حمایت از پژواک، پادکست و ویدئوها را در شبکه‌های اجتماعی منتشر کنید. در رسانه‌های دیگر: instagram.com/pezhvaak_ch youtube.com/@pezhvaak_ch پژواک پلاس: @pezhvaak_plus ✉️ ارتباط با مدیر: @pezhvaak_bot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pezhvaak_ch

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6587,3356,996.56 August 2026 — 6,658 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,658 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,662 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,727 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,830 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,875 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,883 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,897 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,903 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,905 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,909 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,917 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,934 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,971 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,975 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,990 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,111 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,132 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,135 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,147 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,170 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,269 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,286 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,284 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,314 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,335 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net +677. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,556–7,437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:597,335+21
2 Nov 2026, 21:077,314+30
30 Oct 2026, 14:557,284-2
28 Oct 2026, 00:407,286+17
24 Oct 2026, 23:067,269+99
21 Oct 2026, 20:197,170+23
18 Oct 2026, 14:177,147+12
15 Oct 2026, 05:277,135+3
12 Oct 2026, 03:017,132+21
5 Oct 2026, 05:577,111+121
26 Sept 2026, 12:186,990+15
17 Sept 2026, 05:176,975+4
13 Sept 2026, 14:016,971+37
9 Sept 2026, 20:596,934+17
4 Sept 2026, 18:006,917+8
1 Sept 2026, 03:076,909+4
29 Aug 2026, 06:196,905+2
26 Aug 2026, 14:446,903+6
23 Aug 2026, 05:366,897+14
19 Aug 2026, 17:076,883first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 29 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
148.5%
avg views ÷ 7,335 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,900
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held24 (29 March 2025 – 30 October 2026)
Views total21,790
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 02:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Videos
34
Links
71

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
57m 23s
Average length
5m 13s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

30 Oct 2026, 13:51 UTC≈4,790 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎙 شریعت و کمال‌گرایی کمال‌گرایی در شکل ناسالم خود، یکی از موانع بهره‌وری و عوامل اضطراب و سرخوردگی در جهان مدرن است؛ گرفتاربودن میان نمرۀ صفر و بیست. شریعت چه چیزی دربارۀ کمال‌گرایی به ما می‌آموزد؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

21 Oct 2026, 18:45 UTC≈17,000 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

⚠️ دین دیگر جواب نمی‌دهد! __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

11 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC≈27,600 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

⁉️ ریشۀ نفرت اسلام از یهود ✍️ مقالۀ «ریشۀ نفرت اسلام از یهود» ✍️ یادداشت «ابن‌سینا و انقلاب جنسی» __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

8 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈43,300 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

📺 پایان حرفۀ یک کشیش مدت زیادی بود که ویدئوهایی از یک کشیش ایرانی در فضای مجازی دست‌به‌دست می‌شد. در این فرصت به سطح علمی او می‌پردازیم و به چند شبهه که دربارۀ اسلام مطرح کرده است پاسخ می‌دهیم. مقدمه 00:00 شاهکار کشیش در نقد ترجمۀ الهی‌قمشه‌ای 02:06 آیا سیوطی قائل به تحریف قرآن است؟ 03:44 معنای ﴿الصمد﴾ چیست؟ 05:56 آیا قرآن دربارۀ شرک مسیحیان اشتباه کرده است؟! 12:44 در یوتوب، با کیفیت دلخواه تماشا کنید #ویدئو _____…

30 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈19,200 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎙 گفتار نیک تقریباً همگان آموزۀ «گفتار نیک، پندار نیک و کردار نیک» را شنیده‌اند و تقریباً هیچکس معنایش را نمی‌داند! در این عنوان، در کنار تأکید اسلامی بر «گفتار نیک»، به این پرسش می‌پردازیم که آیا می‌توان برای ترویج آیین زرتشتی به ظاهر همین عبارت تکیه کرد؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

29 Jun 2026, 17:07 UTC≈20,900 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎙 نفرین مغاک همۀ ما از دشمنان خود فاصله داریم، اما آیا هم‌زاویه نیستیم؟ چرا گاهی بر دیگران ذره‌بین می‌گذاریم و بر خود چشم می‌بندیم؟ این اپیزود دربارۀ پیشگیری از هیولاشدن است. __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

16 Dec 2025, 17:20 UTC≈36,000 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

⁉️ ایرانیان چگونه مسلمان شدند؟! __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

26 Nov 2025, 17:38 UTC≈36,000 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

⁉️ آیا مسلمانان خانۀ کعبه را می‌پرستند؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

19 Nov 2025, 17:14 UTC≈19,900 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎙 معذرت می‌خوام! این اپیزود کوتاه دربارۀ معنا و چرایی عذرخواستن است؛ آیا می‌توانید به آسانی عذرخواهی کنید؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

9 Nov 2025, 17:53 UTC≈21,600 viewsread 8 November 2026

🎙 من مسلمان بودم اما... با وجود نوکیشانی که از ادیان دیگر به اسلام می‌گروند، کسانی هم هستند که جامۀ مسلمانی از تن بیرون آورند. می‌توان چرخش اعتقادی افراد را از نگاه روانشناختی بررسی کرد، اما گاهی این موضوع جنبۀ خطابه به خود می‌گیرد. آیا در مباحثات علمی جایی برای این شعارها هست؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

22 Oct 2025, 16:50 UTC≈23,500 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

📺 ابن سینا و دین آیا ابن سینا بی‌دینی و خردمندی را ملازم می‌داند و دین‌داران را بی‌خرد می‌پندارد؟ دین‌داران در پاسخ به این گزاره چه می‌گویند؟ در یوتوب، با کیفیت دلخواه تماشا کنید #ویدئو

11 Oct 2025, 18:33 UTC≈22,600 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

⁉️ چرا ندیده شهادت می‌دهیم؟ __________________ @pezhvaak_ch

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @pezhvaak_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

رد شبهات ملحدین
@no_atheism · 26,991
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
شبهه از شما، پاسخ از ما
@shobahat99 · 20,749
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
مرکز هدایت؛ رد اسلام‌ستیزان
@Hedayat1442 · 19,996
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 October 2026
سید عقیل هاشمی
@seyedaqilhashemi · 18,950
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
شبكه كلمه Kalemeh TV Iran
@kalemehtv · 47,379
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pezhvaak | پژواک” (@pezhvaak_ch), 7,335 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pezhvaak_ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.