Канал про крутые и эффективные подходы к рекрутменту, на которых мы зарабатываем каждый день прямо сейчас.
Чат для общения @HRomosoma_Recr
https://clck.ru/35fdWa база знаний канала - здесь много полезного
По вопросам сотрудничества @MariDoz
Created
Between 1 August 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,549–7,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 10:56
7,563
+1
4 Nov 2026, 03:36
7,562
-9
1 Nov 2026, 05:30
7,571
+4
29 Oct 2026, 08:28
7,567
+2
26 Oct 2026, 08:05
7,565
-1
19 Oct 2026, 13:40
7,566
-7
16 Oct 2026, 03:26
7,573
-7
13 Oct 2026, 01:01
7,580
+11
6 Oct 2026, 07:36
7,569
-7
29 Sept 2026, 03:18
7,576
-12
19 Sept 2026, 09:39
7,588
-2
14 Sept 2026, 23:19
7,590
-8
11 Sept 2026, 16:19
7,598
-11
7 Sept 2026, 02:39
7,609
-16
2 Sept 2026, 06:03
7,625
-3
27 Aug 2026, 18:14
7,628
-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:48
7,631
-8
20 Aug 2026, 11:03
7,639
-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:53
7,641
+5
15 Aug 2026, 02:23
7,636
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 16 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
326
Videos
26
Links
358
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
483 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
166
34.4%
❤
150
31.1%
custom 5440792874683744373
71
14.7%
custom 5280854765096416446
40
8.28%
👍
23
4.76%
👏
11
2.28%
🆒
7
1.45%
🤣
4
0.828%
🍾
3
0.621%
🤝
3
0.621%
🗿
2
0.414%
😭
2
0.414%
💯
1
0.207%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 483 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 23 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hirockits. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 January 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔍 Ищем сильного HR Generalist в международную IT-команду
Есть роли, где HR — винтик в большой машине, но эта другая.
Международная IT-компания в сфере антифрод и риск-менеджмента (10+ лет на рынке, работает с банками и финтехом по всему миру) ищет своего единственного HR, который заберёт всю функцию под себя и будет работать в прямом тандеме с основателем.
• Роль с реальным влиянием.
• Прямое подчинение CEO, дост…
300 сообщений. 94 интервью. 23 оффера, чтобы нанять 12 DWH-аналитиков.
И всего одна замена.
Есть вакансии, где, если плейсмент не получается, можно попробовать написать ещё пятистам людям. А есть вакансии, где после этого вы просто обнаружите, что написали всему рынку, потому что он состоит из 500 человек, а нанимать всё ещё некого 🤪
Нашему клиенту нужны были senior DWH-аналитики с глубоким SQL, опытом ETL/ELT и ге…
tl;dr: 35 кандидатов 🤩 8 наших интервью 🤩 4 человека у клиента 🤩 1 оффер 🤩 1 выход.
Вакансию Quantitative Developer в HFT закрыли за 3 недели.
Знакомо ощущение, когда берёшь вакансию и думаешь, что искать её будешь до скончания веков и, скорее всего, попросишь выбить её на своей посмертной табличке? 🤪 И это не обесценивание Клиента, он сам пришел к нам с этим посылом 😁
В нашем случае нужно было найти Quantitative …
Нанимающий менеджер регулярно отказывает кандидатам, но не даёт развёрнутый фидбэк?
Или причины отказа каждый раз разные, а общее впечатление сводится к: «Вроде подходит, но что-то не то».
И иногда задавать открытые вопросы (Что именно не подошло? Кого вы хотите видеть?) не помогает, потому что проблема не в том, что нанимающий менеджер не хочет объяснять, а бывает, ему самому сложно сформулировать, по каким призна…
По мотивам вчерашнего поста с исследованием. Последние несколько месяцев мы проектируем антифрод систему для проверки кандидатов и тестируем антифрод механики. Сейчас берём несколько компаний на тестовые запуски, чтобы обкатать на количестве — по очень приемлемой цене, которая не потребует значительного согласования бюджета. Уже работаем с двумя компаниями и результаты впечатляют — действительно вскрывается фрод там …
Фрод в найме стал массовым
В начале года мы проводили масштабное исследование по проблеме кандидатского фрода, в котором вы тоже принимали участие.
Результаты исследования опубликовали на портале TheHRD.
В исследовании приняли участие 300 респондентов: 88,7% сталкивались с фродом за последний год, 35% — регулярно.
Самые частые форматы: накрутка опыта, искажение роли, подсказки на интервью, фейковые компании, совм…
Вакансия Executive Recruiter
Мы ищем Executive рекрутера для успешной EdTech-компании, находящейся в фазе большой трансформации.
Компания активно растет и запускает новые направления. В связи с этим появляется большое количество нестандартных управленческих ролей, и нам нужен рекрутер, который станет стратегическим партнером СЕО и поможет собрать топовую команду.
Эта роль подойдет рекрутеру, которому интересно раб…
📢А давайте сделаем пульс-опрос, поймем с вами на цифрах, что с HR рынком. Соберу несколько коротких анонимных опросов — потом сведу результаты в один вывод для канала.
В каком направлении вы работаете сейчас?
HR21%
Рекрутер47%
Руководитель HR (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)11%
Руководитель рекрутмента (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)9%
Я не из HR11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Мы понимаем, что здесь в основном наши коллеги, но всё же около 15% участников чата — IT-специалисты. Возможно, этот месседж будет полезен именно вам или долетит через вас до того, кому он сейчас особенно нужен.
У нас освободилось время сильных консультантов, и мы наконец запустили отдельный продукт — помощь с резюме и поиском работы.
Мы каждый день работаем с десятками нанимающих менеджеров — от HR до IT-директоро…
🔥8❤6👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @hirockits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @hirockits as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
25 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📢А давайте сделаем пульс-опрос, поймем с вами на цифрах, что с HR рынком. Соберу несколько коротких анонимных опросов — потом сведу результаты в один вывод для канала.
В каком направлении вы работаете сейчас?
HR21%
Рекрутер47%
Руководитель HR (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)11%
Руководитель рекрутмента (от тимлида до руководителя департамента)9%
Я не из HR11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 5 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Тольятти | Новости | Происшествия @Tolyatti_crazy · 26,430 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
Полезное для Кадровика @trud_krut · 23,338 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
HR[хаб]вакансии @hrhubvacancy · 22,862 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 20 September 2026
topcareer @topcareerschool · 23,207 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 18 September 2026
HR-аналитика @hranalitycs · 34,232 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 3 September 2026
Хабр Карьера @habr_career · 33,726 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hi, Rockits! 👋🏻 Полезности для IT-рекрутеров” (@hirockits), 7,563 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hirockits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.