Много военной истории до XX века и красочных иллюстраций в одном месте!
По всем вопросам к @VyacheslavFW
Добро пожаловать: https://t.me/+Rt4oProUCOYxMTRi
Наш чат: https://t.me/+F7sOciqTnc9hNTli
Created
25 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 89 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,620–9,142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 11:56
9,082
+31
31 Oct 2026, 04:10
9,051
+24
28 Oct 2026, 01:08
9,027
+13
25 Oct 2026, 06:50
9,014
+4
22 Oct 2026, 14:20
9,010
+108
16 Oct 2026, 06:34
8,902
-15
13 Oct 2026, 11:09
8,917
-2
7 Oct 2026, 08:40
8,919
+4
30 Sept 2026, 20:40
8,915
+105
16 Sept 2026, 03:21
8,810
-6
12 Sept 2026, 13:01
8,816
-3
8 Sept 2026, 02:18
8,819
+131
3 Sept 2026, 00:38
8,688
+8
30 Aug 2026, 21:24
8,680
-19
28 Aug 2026, 02:13
8,699
-5
25 Aug 2026, 09:48
8,704
-12
22 Aug 2026, 07:08
8,716
-8
18 Aug 2026, 21:48
8,724
-290
16 Aug 2026, 02:35
9,014
-13
12 Aug 2026, 04:53
9,027
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 9,082 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
54 (26 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
38,380
Reactions total
956
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 09:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,900
Videos
≈7
Links
≈581
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,664 reactions across 54 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,910
52.1%
🔥
1,314
35.9%
🕊
116
3.17%
😢
86
2.35%
💯
68
1.86%
🤯
42
1.15%
⚡
37
1.01%
❤🔥
27
0.737%
🤔
27
0.737%
👎
15
0.409%
🥴
14
0.382%
🥰
4
0.109%
😱
2
0.055%
🤩
2
0.055%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 54 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hist_battle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
1311 год, тевтонские рыцари в бою с литовцами.
Художник: Giuseppe Rava
Интересно, что в условиях "Северного крестового похода" германский рыцарский Орден был вынужден выработать совершенно новую стратегию и тактику.
Суровый климат, особенности местности и противника, с которыми столкнулись тевтонцы, совершенно непривычны для западноевропейской военной мысли. При этом сам Орден унаследовал три аспекта военной традиц…
X век, морское сражение викингов. Художник: Johnny Shumate
Викинги нередко устраивали сражения в открытом море. Как правило, это были конфликты враждующих кланов. Но иногда в морских битвах с норманнами сталкивались флоты европейских стран и городов. Эти бои обычно проходили по схожему сценарию. Викинги выстраивали свой флот в линию, связывая каждый корабль веревками. Так получалась стена из боевых кораблей. И воины…
1807 год, корпус маршала Ожеро попадает в метель в сражении при Прейсиш-Эйлау.
Художник: Keith Rocco
Есть в истории несколько сражений, в ход которых вмешивалась погода, внося серьезные коррективы. Одним из таких стала кровопролитная встреча русской и французской армий в 1807 году у небольшого городка в Восточной Пруссии.
В начале Наполеон, чтобы помочь солдатам Даву разбить русский левый фланг, отправил в бой цель…
Римские геодезисты
Римский легион был не только боевой единицей, но и огромной строительной и административной машиной. И среди специалистов, без которых эта машина не работала, особое место занимали геодезисты, люди, которые мерили землю, размечали лагеря и прокладывали дороги.
В легионах ранней империи такие специалисты назывались менсорами или метаторами в переводе землемеры. Их навыки ценились настолько, что о…
1757 год. Жестокая расправа над капитулировавшими и практически безоружными солдатами произошла в 1757 году, во время Семилетней войны.
Художник: Graham Turner
На североамериканском театре военных действий шло классическое противостояние между Великобританией и Францией. И завершилось оно целиком и полностью в пользу островной империи. Правда, французы тоже могут похвастаться отдельными победами, вроде захвата форта…
1415 год, саперы двух сторон встретились под землей.
Художник: Johnny Shumate
Специальные подкопы-мины, ведущие к вражеским укреплениям, являлись порой единственной возможностью одолеть мощные каменные стены крупных городов и замков. Осаждающие работали над подкопом до стены, под которой впоследствии создавали глубокую и широкую полость, укрепляя деревянными опорами во избежание преждевременного обрушения.
Затем пр…
Галлогласы — наёмники из гэльских кланов в XIII—XVII веках, размахивавшие двуручными мечами, облачившись в тяжёлые, но надёжные кольчуги ⚔️
Переводится название как «иностранные гэлы», потому что нанимателями их услуг были ирландцы и шотландцы, тем самым отмечавшие ассимиляцию наёмников со скандинавами. И знаете, не заметить это было довольно сложно!
Во-первых, это была тяжёлая пехота: никаких коней, только кольчуг…
Король Артур, Круглый стол и Средневековье!
Любишь ли ты легенду про Экскалибур? Знаешь имена рыцарей? А может, тебя бесит Гвиневра?
Тогда тебе самое место в «Духе Камелота».
Если твоя цель — поддерживать дух рыцарства, то нам следует объединиться, чтобы вместе следить за Артурианой на экранах, искать коллекционные предметы на тему, и изучать тему рыцарства, в том числе и в эссе!
Вступай в наши ряды!
👉 Дух Камелот…
1291 год, последний бой тамплиеров в ходе осады Акры.
Художник: Zvonimir Grbasic
Орден тамплиеров создали после успехов Первого крестового похода в 1099 году, когда взяли Иерусалим. Братья-рыцари поклялись тогда, что будут защищать пилигримов. И, собственно, больше полутора столетия они именно этим и занимались. Правда, не забывали обогащаться и приобретать в Европе земли - в основном их владения располагались во Фр…
V век до нашей эры, "бессмертный" из гвардии Дария I Великого.
Художник: Mateusz Przeklasa
Одним из самых загадочных подразделений древности является отряд так называемых "бессмертных". Именно так их назвал древнегреческий автор Геродот, который и оставил нам единственное их описание. Что интересно, отсутствуют персидские источники той поры, упоминающие "бессмертных". И сами персы начинают использовать этот термин л…
146 год до н. э., римляне разрушают город Коринф.
Художник: Johnny Shumate
Многие наслышаны о полном разрушении Карфагена римлянами в 146 году до нашей эры. Однако мало кто знает, что схожая судьба постигла и древнегреческий полис Коринф.
После череды побед над македонцами Рим контролировал практически все поселения Древней Греции. Правда, эллины теперь от сопротивления македонской гегемонии переключились на борьбу…
😢32🕊12🔥7👍4😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @hist_battle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@hist_battle edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @hist_battle as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Записки о Средневековье / Notatki o Średniowieczu / Medieval Notes @medievalnotes · 20,276 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
История и истории @historygothy · 20,841 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Популярная наука @PopularNauka · 20,374 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 September 2026
ЗЕЛЁНЫЙ МАЯК @zlnmayak · 39,867 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Исторические сражения” (@hist_battle), 9,082 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hist_battle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.