Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Истомин Виталий🫶

Channel

Истомин Виталий🫶

@istomin_chef

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,166subscribers

-330 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001257629832
TypeChannel
Username@istomin_chef
Descriptionhttps://knd.gov.ru/license? id=67490dc10acf9c1f42aef94c&registryType=bloggersPermission https://www.instagram.com/istomin_vitaly Любые вопросы @katkhagroup / @katkha_group Рестораны:🍽 AVA🐠PATRIKI🇮🇹LOONA🍣NARNIA🥐AVA BISTRO🔥PHANTOM 🇬🇷Afina
Created19 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/istomin_chef

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,16630,49630,3316 August 2026 — 30,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,489 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,495 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,488 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,483 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,476 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,473 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,463 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,443 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,435 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,431 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,428 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,419 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,416 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,405 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,400 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,402 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,397 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,395 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,378 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,374 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,363 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,345 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,343 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,334 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,336 subscribers5 September 2026 — 30,314 subscribers8 September 2026 — 30,294 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,276 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,258 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,241 subscribers16 September 2026 — 30,197 subscribers19 September 2026 — 30,166 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -330. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,117–30,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:5630,166-31
16 Sept 2026, 16:5930,197-44
14 Sept 2026, 19:5530,241-17
13 Sept 2026, 06:0130,258-18
11 Sept 2026, 05:2030,276-18
8 Sept 2026, 06:2030,294-20
5 Sept 2026, 04:5730,314-22
3 Sept 2026, 13:1830,336+2
2 Sept 2026, 07:3430,334-9
1 Sept 2026, 07:2830,343-2
31 Aug 2026, 06:2330,345-18
30 Aug 2026, 04:0430,363-11
29 Aug 2026, 07:1430,374-4
28 Aug 2026, 08:1530,378-17
27 Aug 2026, 08:5330,395-2
26 Aug 2026, 12:1330,397-5
25 Aug 2026, 12:3230,402+2
24 Aug 2026, 12:0730,400-5
22 Aug 2026, 16:3630,405-11
21 Aug 2026, 04:1230,416first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 30,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,100
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held52 (12 June 202620 September 2026)
Views total127,030
Reactions total3,883
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 00:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,590
Videos
774
Links
151

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 21s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,930 reactions across 51 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,51331.7%
😁1,66421.0%
🔥1,34717.0%
🤣4876.14%
🥰4876.14%
❤‍🔥3174.00%
💯3053.85%
👍2042.57%
🤯851.07%
👏640.807%
😱630.794%
💩600.757%
🙏600.757%
🤔480.605%
🤩410.517%
🤪320.404%
🤮310.391%
😍150.189%
😢130.164%
👀100.126%
16 further kinds841.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 52 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @istomin_chef. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 05:09 UTC≈2,370 views136 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Вопрос

😁91💯23🔥10👏53💅2👎1🤣1

18 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈3,290 views65 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Зуммеры-азиаты придумали очередной тренд и делают в маке кошачьи шапки из пакетов Ждем ответ от вкусно и точка с шапочками из фольги?

😁45🤪146

18 Sept 2026, 15:27 UTC≈3,490 views234 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026

Привет, ребята. 30 сентября закрывается Sage. И мне кажется, эта история хорошо отвечает на вопрос, зачем вообще люди ходят в рестораны После реконцепта там стало больше зожа: КБЖУ, протеин, коллаген, меньше сахара и жиров, все самого правильного и полезного. И конечно ресторан может быть умным, полезным, экологичным, фермерским, биодинамическим и каким угодно, но сначала он должен приносить удовольствие. Потому чт

🔥13353💯32😁12👎2👌1🕊1

18 Sept 2026, 11:20 UTC≈3,590 views97 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Тренд на все русское добрался уже и до онигири

😁53💩20🤪10🤮85🔥1

17 Sept 2026, 11:29 UTC≈3,730 views105 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Кажется, русская кухня окончательно увлекла Москву. Alba Group в ноябре открывает на Тверском бульваре Лёлю — современный русский ресторан с Энвером Джемиловым, локальными продуктами, ремеслами и русским искусством А Александр Раппопорт ближе к зиме возвращает Асторию на Центральном Московском ипподроме. Ресторан существовал здесь еще в 1930-х, а теперь обещают современную русскую кухню и «высокую кулинарию на кажд

🔥7131😁3

17 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,420 views93 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Ребята, хочу услышать ваши доводы: за и против

💯61🤔19😁94

16 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC≈3,910 views103 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

В Москве появилось место, куда бы я обязательно заглянул. Dean’s формально английский паб. Темное дерево, теснота, дартс на стене, гиннесс, фиш-энд-чипс, приборы кучей в металлическом стакане и пакетики с чипсами за баром. В общем, полная демонстрация того, что здесь все максимально просто и никто особенно не старался. Но, конечно, старались очень сильно. Чипсы оказываются домашними и сделаны из пастернака. С пивом с

78🔥19🤩6

16 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈3,980 views198 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Гость, из-за отсутствия стола для него, пишет 4 негативных отзыва и обещает записать ролик в ютюб. Как же не лень…

😁96🤯6713💩11🤣11

15 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈4,100 views114 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Увидел этот бокал-колокольчик в питерском poool bistro, и захотелось его прикарманить

85🤩21😁8

15 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTC≈4,440 views104 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Привет, ребята. Во вражеской Америке сейчас популярно вино со вкусом яблочного пирога. Обещают, что все сделано как у бабушки, только с алкоголем: яблоки, корица, мускатный орех, коричневый сахар и ваниль. Пить предлагают холодным, теплым или вообще сделать из него глинтвейн Как человек который смотрел все части американского пирога эту мразь я пробовать отказываюсь.

🤣936😁5

14 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTC≈4,500 views86 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Очень интересно, сколько было уплочено, чтобы японский хоррор AnyMart в российском прокате назывался «Вкускилл»

😁6417👎2💅2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @istomin_chef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@istomin_chef edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Instafoodpassion
@instafoodpassion · 27,370
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026
Макс Галишников
@makcgalishnikov · 96,389
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
FOODISCOVERY
@foodiscovery · 27,923
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Энди шеф — бесплатные рецепты
@blog_andychef · 117,529
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Resto_ray | Рецепты от шефа
@resto_ray · 96,612
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
Коте Оганезов
@koteoganezov · 133,592
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
СысоевFM
@sysoevfm · 372,919
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Журнал Соль
@thesaltmagazine · 146,099
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Истомин Виталий🫶” (@istomin_chef), 30,166 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/istomin_chef.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.