Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 41 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,062–11,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:18
11,090
-4
15 Sept 2026, 13:58
11,094
+8
11 Sept 2026, 23:38
11,086
+2
9 Sept 2026, 14:37
11,084
+2
6 Sept 2026, 07:00
11,082
+2
4 Sept 2026, 01:40
11,080
-7
2 Sept 2026, 18:29
11,087
+8
1 Sept 2026, 18:18
11,079
-6
31 Aug 2026, 20:07
11,085
+2
30 Aug 2026, 22:17
11,083
+7
29 Aug 2026, 19:34
11,076
+7
28 Aug 2026, 21:04
11,069
+1
26 Aug 2026, 18:45
11,068
-1
25 Aug 2026, 19:36
11,069
+2
24 Aug 2026, 21:43
11,067
+1
23 Aug 2026, 06:04
11,066
-11
21 Aug 2026, 15:07
11,077
+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:46
11,076
-9
19 Aug 2026, 17:46
11,085
+3
18 Aug 2026, 20:43
11,082
first reading
Engagement
161 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.01%
avg views ÷ 11,090 subscribers
Avg views / post
888
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 161 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 67 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
161 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
60,394
Reactions total
1,060
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17m 11s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,283 reactions across 157 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,360
41.4%
👏
672
20.5%
👍
522
15.9%
💯
243
7.40%
👌
207
6.31%
💔
92
2.80%
🙏
78
2.38%
😢
51
1.55%
🤔
14
0.426%
👎
13
0.396%
🥰
11
0.335%
🎉
7
0.213%
🔥
5
0.152%
🤣
5
0.152%
🫡
3
0.091%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 161 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,283 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 161 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚓پس از این که بساط تظاهرکنندگان را از خیابان برچیدی، یادت باشد هر کسی را به ذهنت رسید، مقصر اعلام کنی. به هر حال در جریان سرکوبها عدهای کشته و زخمی شدهاند و اپوزیسیون میکوشد تو را مقصر اصلی اعلام کند. اما پیش دستی کن و دیگران را مقصر اعلام کن. بگو خارجیها برنامه ریز اصلی تظاهرات بودهاند.
بگو اراذل و اوباش تحت هدایت سازمان دهندگانِ تظاهرات، دست به خشونت زدهاند؛ بگو تروریست ها و افراط گرایان در صفوف تظاهرکنندگا…
☕️قطعهای از کتاب
کشتار و ظلمشان، آنقدر روح را نمیخراشید
و قلب را آزار نمیداد که وقاحت و بیشرمیشان در تحریفِ حقایق!
📕 #استالین_خوب
✍ #ویکتور_ارافیف
https://t.me/ketab1yar
اگر دیگران ارزش مرا نمی دانستند، اساسا به این خاطر بود که خودم هم توجه زیادی به خودم نداشتم. اشتباه نکنید، من خیلی به خودم اهمیت می دادم و نازپرورده بودم، ولی در درونم "دختری تنها" پنهان شده بود که نیازش تنها در این خلاصه می شد که مردی شایسته او را
📕 #اشتباهات_یک_زن
✍🏻 #ام_سوسا
https://t.me/ketab1yar
درود
دنیا چیزی جز پژواک نیست!
یادمان باشد که زندگی، آینهی تمام نمای رفتار ماست.
هر آنچه امروز میکاریم، فردا درو خواهیم کرد.
اگر مهر بورزیم ، مهر میبینیم
اگر لبخند ببخشیم، لبخند میگیریم.
پس حواسمان را بیشتر جمع کنیم
که در گفتارمان، در کردارمان و در نیتمان
بهترینِ خودمان باشیم
تا بهترینها به سوی ما بازگردند.
نمیشود که خودمان خوب نباشیم،
اما از دنیا و آدمها انتظار خوبی داشته باشیم.
https://t.me/ketab1yar
با…
• اگر از صحبت کردن در جمع خجالت میکشی
کتاب “هنر سخنرانی در جمع” را بخوان،
• اگر دائم کارهات را به بعد موکول میکنی
کتاب “قانون ۵ ثانیه” را بخوان،
• اگر برنامه ریزی کردن برات سخته
کتاب “برنامه ریزی به روش بولت ژورنال” را بخوان،
• اگر میخوای عزت نفست را افزایش بدی
کتاب “شش ستون عزت نفس” را بخوان،
• اگر صبح زود بیدار شدن برات سخته
کتاب “باشگاه پنج صبحی ها” را بخوان،
• اگر عادتهای بد داری
کتاب “عادت های اتمی” را …
"فلسفه هنر زیستن است، نه دانستن صرف؛ زیرا دانشی که به زندگی نینجامد، باری بر دوش انسان خواهد بود."
#مارک_کینگول
#چرا_فلسفه_مهم_است
https://t.me/ketab1yar
همین که پایم را می گذارم خانه کسی قبل از هر کجای دیگری می روم سراغ کتابخانهی طرف. چون که جلوی کتابخانه کسی بهتر از هر کجای دیگر میشود روحیات صاحبخانه را شناخت
📕 #کافه_پیانو
✍ #فرهاد_جعفری
درود بامدادتان به روشنی 🙏❤️🌹
https://t.me/ketab1yar
در کتاب سفر به انتهای شب خبری از خودسانسوری، ترس و خجالت نیست. نویسنده برجستهی فرانسوی لویی فردینان سلین داستان معروف خود را که برنده جایزه ادبی رنودو فرانسه نیز شده است، از جنگ جهانی اول آغاز میکند. شخصیت این اثر برخلاف عرف و تصور، قهرمان و عاشق مبارزه نیست. او همانند بسیاری از مردم از جنگ واهمه دارد و خواهان دنیایی بدون خشونت است.
درباره کتاب سفر به انتهای شب:
لویی فردینان سلین (Louis-Ferdinand Céline) شخصیت این…
این کارل پوپر هست - فیلسوف علم - ۱۹۰۲ تا ۱۹۹۴
یکی از قشنگترین تعریفهایی که از حقیقت کرده است.
متن کامل حرفش:
و من واقعاً باور دارم که خیلی از حرفهایی که فکر میکنیم درسته، واقعاً درسته.
همینطور باور دارم که خیلی از حرفهایی که فکر میکنیم درسته، غلطن.
و باور ندارم معیاری وجود داشته باشه که با اطمینان بشه باهاش حرفهای درست رو از غلط تشخیص داد. و این عمیقترین دلیل برای جایزالخطا بودن انسانه.
این به این معنی نیست…
❤10👍5💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 161 posts we hold for @ketab1yar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
معلمان شاد @moallemshad · 50,267 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کتاب یار 📚” (@ketab1yar), 11,090 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketab1yar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.