Channel
@konuhova_nutrifem
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
473subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001763612784 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @konuhova_nutrifem |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/konuhova_nutrifem |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 473 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 472 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:23 | 472 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 33 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 56.4% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 16.4% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 7.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет, если вам сейчас актуальна тема питания, энергии, веса и возвращения в нормальный режим, хочу пригласить вас в мой бесплатный сентябрьский детокс 🌿 20 сентября мы начинаем 5-дневный лёгкий детокс в закрытой группе WhatsApp. Это будет мягкий формат без голодовок и экстремальных ограничений. В течение этих пяти дней будем разбирать и постепенно внедрять базовые вещи: • достаточное количество белка • сни…
❤5
Иногда смотрю на свою жизнь сейчас и думаю: если бы мне несколько лет назад показали один мой обычный сегодняшний день, я бы, наверное, сильно удивилась 😅 Утром - семья, школа, какие-то обычные домашние дела. Потом - контент, съёмки, Instagram, Telegram. Параллельно мы развиваем здесь, в Сан-Диего, ещё одно направление - кейтеринг с пловом на открытом огне. Недавно как раз снова показывала вам немного этого процес…
❤4
Каждая технологическая революция забирала у человека часть того, что раньше мог делать только он. Машины взяли на себя физический труд. Калькуляторы и компьютеры - сложные расчёты. Интернет избавил нас от необходимости держать в голове огромное количество информации. Но с искусственным интеллектом происходит кое-что другое. Он впервые заходит туда, что мы всегда считали исключительно человеческим: способность дума…
👏4
На выходные оставлю вам кое-что вместо сериала 😁 Наткнулась на очень интересный разговор Оскара Хартманна с Романом Ямпольским - профессором и одним из самых цитируемых экспертов по искусственному интеллекту. Название уже прекрасное: «Как ИИ обманывает людей?» 😂 То есть мы ещё не успели толком разобраться, как им пользоваться, а он, оказывается, уже нас обманывает. Но если серьёзно, разговор очень интересный. Про …
👍4
А ещё поделилась большим количеством фото и видео из нашей поездки к гигантским секвойям, если интересно, подписывайтесь на наш семейный канал ⬇️ https://t.me/koniukhovy
❤5
https://t.me/koniukhovy/1250
👍5
Когда мы были в парке Секвойя, один день решили посвятить походу к водопаду. Да, водопад оказался почти пересохшим. Но главным открытием этого дня стал совсем не он. Несмотря на то что подъём дался мне непросто физически, внутри появилось то самое чувство, которое я уже испытывала много лет назад. Ещё когда мы жили в Сочи, если накапливался стресс или просто хотелось выдохнуть, меня почти всегда тянуло не к морю. …
❤7
Video, posted without a caption
🔥6
Продолжаю отвечать на ваши вопросы 🙋🏻♀️
🔥5
Наверное, это был один из самых необычных дней рождения. Без аниматоров. Без большого праздника. Без шумной компании. Зато среди огромных деревьев, гор, костра и настоящего звёздного неба. Матвей давно мечтал увидеть гигантские секвойи. И мы решили исполнить его мечту именно так. Поставили палатку. Почти исчезли со связи. Несколько дней жили совсем в другом ритме. За это время к нашему лагерю дважды выходил…
❤5
В ближайшие дни продолжу отвечать на ваши вопросы, буду сюда тоже дублировать 🤝
❤5
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @konuhova_nutrifem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наталья Конюхова | Nutrifem” (@konuhova_nutrifem), 473 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konuhova_nutrifem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.