Channel
@kost1969
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
83,860subscribers
+862 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002128282729 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kost1969 |
| Description | Неудобные мысли, аналитика, история. Взгляд на мир сквозь призму иронии и здравого смысла. По вопросам сотрудничества обращаться @AM_shop_bot Авторский курс истории Украины: https://newhistory.com.ua |
| Created | 27 December 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kost1969 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
89,400 average views per post against 83,860 subscribers — an engagement rate of 106.6%. Across the 8,410 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 21.1%, with a median of 10.5%.
| Window | 30 days (21 August 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 43 of 44 published in the window (0 exact, 43 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 3,842,500 |
| Mature posts only | 106.6% over 43 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 83,860 measured 18 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,410 channels · p10 2.53% · p25 5.08% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.1% · p90 36.2% |
| Position in cohort | 99.798th percentile · 10.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.025% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 95.5% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 83,860 | +24 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 83,836 | +37 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 83,799 | +226 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 83,573 | +12 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 83,561 | +100 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 83,461 | -56 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 83,517 | +65 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 83,452 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 83,455 | -38 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 83,493 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 83,498 | +14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 83,484 | +14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 83,470 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 83,501 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 83,495 | -35 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 83,530 | +16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 83,514 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 83,528 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 83,536 | -21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 83,557 | first reading |
83 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (16 July 2026 – 17 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,842,500 |
| Reactions total | 140,659 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
273,040 reactions across 81 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 70,433 | 25.8% | |
| 💯 | 58,303 | 21.4% | |
| 😁 | 52,161 | 19.1% | |
| 👍 | 43,848 | 16.1% | |
| ❤ | 12,580 | 4.61% | |
| 👏 | 6,830 | 2.50% | |
| 🙈 | 6,420 | 2.35% | |
| 🔥 | 5,330 | 1.95% | |
| 💊 | 5,118 | 1.87% | |
| 🤔 | 3,756 | 1.38% | |
| 😢 | 2,006 | 0.735% | |
| 🤯 | 857 | 0.314% | |
| 🙉 | 541 | 0.198% | |
| 🙊 | 521 | 0.191% | |
| 🤪 | 493 | 0.181% | |
| 👎 | 482 | 0.177% | |
| 😱 | 399 | 0.146% | |
| 🤝 | 288 | 0.105% | |
| 👀 | 287 | 0.105% | |
| 🤬 | 270 | 0.099% | |
| 36 further kinds | 2,117 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276,377 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Владимир Зеленский: «Жаль, что Китай не на нашей стороне». Как не на нашей? Нам пять лет говорят, что «весь мир с Украиной». Контрреволюционные вещи говорите, Владимир Александрович!
😁1,930💯812🤣461👏110🙉58❤37👍28🤪20
Зеленскому его команда оказала очередную медвежью услугу - заблокировали выступление Юлии Мендель в здании Европарламента. Как человек, неоднократно организовывавший мероприятия в Европарламенте, могу сказать: если бы Мендель выступила, это вряд ли стало бы сенсацией для европейской политической публики. Обычно на подобного рода мероприятия приходят либо мотивированные политики, либо скучающие, либо по фракционной р…
👍1,810💯1,450❤321👏147🤔67🔥49😁35🤣21
Я тоже читал и плакал: у Государства Израиль нет Конституции.
🤣3,830😁580👏245💯128🙈89👍68🔥65❤51
Программа «Городок». Зеленский и Кравченко. https://youtu.be/T1cj6t3Vj7E?si=86941fgKWvyvM5SY
😁1,170👍635💯355🤣119🔥75❤48👏46👀6
Меня второй день штурмуют вопросами о Руслане Кравченко: «Ну как тебе? Что ты думаешь?». Что я думаю? Мы слишком много внимания уделяем господину Кравченко, подозревая его в субъектности или думая, что его случай - нечто экстраординарное. На самом деле кейс Кравченко - это только иллюстрация к состоянию дел в государстве. Полностью разрушенная система госуправления. Коррупция уже не является элементом, угрожающим гос…
💯2,600👍490😢168❤118👏56🔥37🤬10👀8
Из-за плохого владения украинским языком в окружении Зеленского считают, что лозунг «розбудова держави» переводится как «расстройство государства». Вот и действуют сообразно пониманию.
🤣2,050💯783😁449👍131❤64🙈44😢35🔥22
Зеленский ввел санкции против своего бывшего пресс-секретаря Юлии Мендель. Я так понимаю, это то событие, которое анонсировал Дмитрий Гордон?
🤣2,620😁473💯206👌59👏47❤44💊44🔥39
Святой Франциск, как известно, проповедовал птицам. Также известно, что «українська мова - соловʼїна». И, похоже, инициаторы надругательства над украинским языком реформы украинского языка делают все для того, чтобы в перспективе он мог использоваться только для проповедей святого Франциска. Соловьям.
💯1,600😁745👍283🙈175🤣109👏50❤44💊33
Заметили, как поменялись понятия? Патриотизм – это уже не любовь к родной земле, традициям, языку или культуре? Сейчас быть патриотом – это в первую очередь ненавидеть. Ненавидеть яростно, профессионально, активно. Понятийную и доказательную базу под ненависть подвести несложно. Образ врага автоматически распространяется не только на армию и политический класс противника, но и на всю гуманитарную сферу: враг должен …
💯4,020👏1,070❤429👍311😢220🔥86🤣81💊67
Не успел опубликовать книгу «Профайлы: энциклопедия позднего Путина», как уже пора вносить коррективы. Сегодня уволен один из героев книги - руководитель Службы экономической безопасности ФСБ Сергей Алпатов. В принципе, это увольнение прогнозировалось, но все же… Пора перемещать биографию Алпатова из раздела «Силовики» в раздел «Те, кто выпали из обоймы».
👍600😁456🤔165👏56❤47🤷♂35🤣10🥱9
Передайте Зеленскому, что я могу подсказать места захоронения прадеда двоюродной сестры тещи Мельника, соседа по лестничной площадке, который жил рядом с Мельником в Риме, садовника из Клерво и его жены (они в последние годы жизни Мельника косили газон и носили продукты Мельнику и его жене). Также я могу подсказать местонахождение могилы любовницы Степана Федака - шурина Мельника. Считаю, что все эти достойные люди д…
🤣2,720😁1,040👍363🔥223🙈184👏107❤94🤯60
В Европейском парламенте предлагают лишить финансирования Саксонию-Анхальт из-за победы на выборах «Альтернативы для Германии». АдГ «действует против европейского проекта и Евросоюза, и, если потребуется, Еврокомиссия будет вынуждена приостановить финансирование», - заявил депутат Европарламента от партии «Зеленые» Даниэль Фройнд. По его словам, после заморозки помощи для Венгрии и Польши «в обеих странах произошли…
😁1,080💯764👍339🤣219🤯95❤87👏31🔥14
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @kost1969. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kost1969 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бондаренко: Былое и Думы” (@kost1969), 83,860 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kost1969.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.