Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мама Марка 💗

Channel

Мама Марка 💗

@mamamarka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

20,038subscribers

+9,864 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001814134164
TypeChannel
Username@mamamarka
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mamamarka

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,11021,79915,954.520,0386 August 20266 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 92 days, net +9,864. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,357–23,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 05:4520,038-157
5 Nov 2026, 07:3820,195-118
4 Nov 2026, 03:3120,313+254
3 Nov 2026, 04:0120,059+31
2 Nov 2026, 05:5720,028-263
1 Nov 2026, 04:5620,291-146
31 Oct 2026, 02:0020,437-86
30 Oct 2026, 04:3720,523+452
29 Oct 2026, 01:5720,071-22
28 Oct 2026, 01:0020,093+61
27 Oct 2026, 04:0720,032+22
26 Oct 2026, 06:4720,010-163
25 Oct 2026, 09:2720,173+44
24 Oct 2026, 09:5020,129-213
23 Oct 2026, 12:1820,342+230
22 Oct 2026, 15:4520,112-251
21 Oct 2026, 13:4120,363+274
20 Oct 2026, 10:3120,089-337
19 Oct 2026, 13:4820,426+318
18 Oct 2026, 15:1920,108first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 20,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,820
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held85 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total33,845
Reactions total1,874
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 03:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 15s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,927 reactions across 84 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,21058.4%
👍2,24225.1%
🔥1,14912.9%
custom 53394475378771548733263.65%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,927 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.18%
1 of 85 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,270
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,270
over 83 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjcSuScB129 August 202629 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 20:38 UTC35 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤4🔥4👍2

5 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,020 views130 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня для меня было удивлением, что уже готовятся к Новому году, но только же начался ноябрь, не?🥴 По моему рановато…Поликлиники, кофейни, ТЦ, улицы Москвы🌲 У нас еще 🟨🟨 Я одна так считаю? #мыслиевы @mamamarka Я в МАКСе 🌷Я в VK 🔥

❤62👍57🔥11

4 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC≈3,130 views177 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤108👍59🔥10

4 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTC≈3,130 views178 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

У нас совместный выходной, так круто видеть ребёнка, который прыгает и бегает, а не сидит в планшете, а это все батутный центр «Небо» 🩵 В «Небо» много батутов, огромная площадь, горки, всякие лазелки, испытания. Здесь есть и большой высокий веревочный парк и детская игровая. А самое классное, что можно и пообедать в кафе, кстати очень вкусно, я взяла зеленый салат, Марк свой любимый бургер и фри, а мама ела пиццу! …

❤110👍59🔥9

4 Nov 2026, 08:49 UTC≈3,130 views135 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

С Днём народного единства! Этот праздник хороший повод вспомнить, как важна сплочённость. 4 ноября мы отмечаем события 1612 года, когда народное ополчение под руководством Кузьмы Минина и Дмитрия Пожарского освободило Москву от интервентов. В те времена люди разных сословий и национальностей объединились ради общей цели спасти страну. И сегодня праздник напоминает, что наша сила в единстве многонационального наро…

❤60👍59🔥16

3 Nov 2026, 18:26 UTC≈3,140 views184 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤110👍61🔥13

2 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTC≈3,200 views182 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Марк не хочет делится со мной Topicrem Мы обожаем этот бренд, с самого рождения пользовались и решили вернуться, так как отопительный сезон, кожу нужно увлажнять и поддерживать. Взяли набор средств Topicrem из линейки Ultra Hydratant 🔴Молочко для тела 🔴Ультраувлажняющее масло для душа 🔴Крем для рук, компактный, такой мне нужен! 🔴Скраб для тела, впервые буду тестировать! Вы знакомы с брендом?✔️ #находкиевы #модный…

❤110👍60🔥12

2 Nov 2026, 17:10 UTC≈3,190 views181 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤111👍59🔥11

1 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC≈3,220 views189 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤115👍58🔥16

1 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,250 views194 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

«Сиртаки и вино» У нас Марк уехал на выходные к бабушке. Я решила пригласить мужа на свидание в Греческое бистро. Он проводил в детстве время в спортивном лагере в Солониках, поэтому для него это был неожиданный сюрприз 🇬🇷 Здесь вайбово, приглушенная обстановка, приятная музыка. Кухня понравилась🩷 🔴Я попробовала греческий салат, томатный суп с морепродуктами, орзо с тыквой, пиде с креветками. Муж попробовал салат …

❤111👍65🔥18

31 Oct 2026, 18:44 UTC≈3,180 views176 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤108👍57🔥11

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @mamamarka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mamamarka edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @mamamarka as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мама Марка 💗” (@mamamarka), 20,038 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamamarka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.