Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дом Некеле. Психология. Пишет Ирина Мальцева

Channel

Дом Некеле. Психология. Пишет Ирина Мальцева

@nekeletext

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,913subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001940674792
TypeChannel
Username@nekeletext
Created3 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nekeletext

Growth

10,89110,92110,9066 August 2026 — 10,920 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,920 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,921 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,918 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,914 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,910 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,906 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,896 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,891 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,895 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,892 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,891 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,895 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,896 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,900 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,897 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,898 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,899 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,903 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,904 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,905 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,910 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,913 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,907 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,904 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,913 subscribers10,9136 August 20264 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 29 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,887–10,926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 12:5810,913+9
2 Sept 2026, 22:3810,904-3
1 Sept 2026, 22:3610,907-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:3810,913+3
31 Aug 2026, 03:2510,910+5
30 Aug 2026, 00:4510,905+1
28 Aug 2026, 21:3810,904+1
28 Aug 2026, 00:1210,903+4
26 Aug 2026, 21:1410,899+1
25 Aug 2026, 23:0710,898+1
24 Aug 2026, 20:2710,897-3
23 Aug 2026, 04:5710,900+4
21 Aug 2026, 13:5210,896+1
20 Aug 2026, 09:5310,895+4
19 Aug 2026, 11:0610,891-1
18 Aug 2026, 12:0310,892-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:1710,895+4
15 Aug 2026, 19:5810,891-5
14 Aug 2026, 09:1710,896-10
13 Aug 2026, 03:1510,906first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 10,913 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held64 (2 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total105,494
Reactions total13,423
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 19:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14,635 reactions across 62 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,03854.9%
🔥2,68518.3%
😁2,60417.8%
👍5253.59%
💯3872.64%
👏840.574%
🙏720.492%
🤗460.314%
😭440.301%
💔400.273%
🕊310.212%
😢210.143%
🤔140.096%
😎110.075%
🤝90.061%
💘80.055%
👌70.048%
💅40.027%
🗿30.02%
20.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 64 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nekeletext. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 16:33 UTC614 views38 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Дайджест - 5 самых читаемых постов августа 1. Путь муми-троллей - о мире теплых живых существ и его создателе. 2. О любви ощутимой и центробежной - и о том, что любить - значит действовать 3. Что мы рассказываем себе о самих себе - про то, как переписать свою историю 4. Про живительную силу гнева - и о том, как использовать ее себе на пользу 5. Про глубокие отношения - о том, что прочная связь требует времени

38

1 Sept 2026, 03:33 UTC≈1,230 views97 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥50😁26👍174

1 Sept 2026, 03:33 UTC≈1,220 views122 reactionsread 1 September 2026

На порожке, на самом краешке осени вот вам снова анонсы и рабочие новости. В хронологическом порядке: 1. С пятницы, 4 сентября, буду на "Мельнице" под Питером, выступлю с темой "Напарничество в долгих отношениях". Предвкушаю и выступление, и встречи, и вообще атмосферу неповторимую. Ссылка здесь 2. Седьмого, в понедельник, я буду вечером в Питере и свободна. Это к тому, что можно устроить встречу и подписать книги,

101👍17🕊4

31 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC≈1,430 views149 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Фото: Фил Боргес Картина: Ванг Игуанг

119🔥30

31 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC≈1,470 views287 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Про внутреннюю силу Личная сила растет, когда делаешь. Это единственный способ. И то, делание деланию рознь. Она не растет, когда мы: - осознаем; - слушаем умных (просветленных, духовных, успешных) людей; - понимаем; - проживаем инсайты и катарсисы; - читаем умные книги. Это все очень клево и вызывает уважение, но не прибавляет силы. Все это - только подготовка тары для нее. Но кувшин останется пуст, если по итога

194🔥80👍13

30 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈1,580 views401 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

картинки - мои кони ночью и днем, с седла и на холмах, последняя неделя августа

303🔥89💘8👏1

30 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈1,560 views390 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026

Про глубокие отношения Расскажу вам историю из сегодняшнего обычного дня. Лошадь моя, молодая темпераментная дуреха, сегодня с утра на холме сбежала из рук моего мужа к возлюбленному коню и, пока носилась, потеряла кол, который утащила вместе с веревкой. Пасется она на длинной привязи, кол нужная штука. Это коричневая железяка толщиной в пару пальцев и длиной см 25, то есть, не очень большая. Она запропала где-то в

306🔥76👍6💯2

29 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,660 views149 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥9059

29 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,760 views255 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026

Ограничения делают игру У всякой игры есть условия, они же ограничения. Если нет правил, то есть, договоренностей, ограничивающих действия игроков, не будет никакой игры. Тут пролетают адепты позитивного мышления с лозунгом "ты можешь все, делай, что хочешь". Вот перед тобой твое "что хочешь" - миллионы вариантов. На самом деле нет, ну, с десяток. Ты вроде обладаешь всеми этими возможностями, но не выбираешь ни од

182🔥44👍22💯4👌3

28 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC≈1,780 views135 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥7445😁16

28 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC≈1,800 views364 reactionsread 1 September 2026

#буднитворцов О творческом топливе Я сейчас чувствую себя очень хорошо снаряженной для разной творческой работы. Любимое время года, много движения, много красоты вокруг, поездки и впечатления тоже падают в этот котелок. И, конечно, как всякий творец, пытаюсь сделать побольше. Обойти норму. У меня довольно широкие пределы этой самой нормы, но и большие задачи: ежедневный авторский пост вот прямо сюда, плюс домашнее

286👍25🔥19🕊13🙏10👏5👌4🤝2

27 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC≈2,120 views216 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

133🔥67👍16

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @nekeletext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

#ЧёртовыПодростки
@FreakingTeens · 38,678
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА АЛЕКСЕЕВА
@psyaal · 38,996
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Татьяна Мужицкая и все-все-все
@muzhitskaya · 164,723
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Nice&Easy / Нутрициолог Дарья Савельева
@perekusovnet · 39,752
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Анна Кирьянова: эссе о жизни и любви
@av_kiryanova · 81,294
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дом Некеле. Психология. Пишет Ирина Мальцева” (@nekeletext), 10,913 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nekeletext.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.