Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نَبـــض ♥️

Channel

نَبـــض ♥️

@oomarr5

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,081subscribers

+120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001203368243
TypeChannel
Username@oomarr5
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oomarr5

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

14.9 average views per post against 22,081 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.068%. Across the 5,223 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.41% and 12.8%, with a median of 6.52%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (10 August 2026 9 September 2026)
Posts measured148 of 148 published in the window (148 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,206
Mature posts only0.493% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers22,081 measured 7 September 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 5,223 channels · p10 0.765% · p25 2.41% · p50 6.52% · p75 12.8% · p90 21.8%
Position in cohort0.345th percentile · 1/100 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.131% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 9 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

21,81522,09921,9576 August 2026 — 21,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,961 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,942 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,912 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,886 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,897 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,959 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,940 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,910 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,877 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,852 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,838 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,815 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,858 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,950 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,042 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,032 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,994 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,963 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,997 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,013 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,009 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,986 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,962 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,984 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,022 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,049 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,099 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22,081 subscribers22,0816 August 20267 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net +120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,772–22,142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 15:3622,081-18
4 Sept 2026, 19:2022,099+50
3 Sept 2026, 05:5822,049+27
2 Sept 2026, 03:1722,022+38
1 Sept 2026, 00:3821,984+22
30 Aug 2026, 22:5521,962-24
29 Aug 2026, 22:2421,986-23
29 Aug 2026, 01:0822,009-4
28 Aug 2026, 01:3722,013+16
27 Aug 2026, 03:4421,997+34
26 Aug 2026, 02:1521,963-31
25 Aug 2026, 05:1521,994-38
24 Aug 2026, 04:0722,032-10
22 Aug 2026, 10:3422,042+92
20 Aug 2026, 23:0321,950+92
19 Aug 2026, 20:3321,858+43
18 Aug 2026, 21:2621,815-23
17 Aug 2026, 20:1621,838-14
16 Aug 2026, 22:1421,852-25
15 Aug 2026, 16:4421,877first reading

Engagement

204 posts held, back to 29 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.068%
avg views ÷ 22,081 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.9
148 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
148
of 204 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held204 (29 January 20263 September 2026)
Views total2,206
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 45s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6490.1%
👍45.63%
👏22.82%
💯11.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 204 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 204 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 11:57 UTC1 viewsread 3 September 2026

تمت إزالتك ❓❗️

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

2 Sept 2026, 22:59 UTC3 viewsread 2 September 2026

إلى كاااااااافة أعضاء القناة يرجى الاشتراك بهذه القناة بسررررعة قبل الحذف📌. https://t.me/Zad_Re https://t.me/Zad_Re ملاحظة الرابط مؤقت سارع بالانضمام🔥.

Signed بوت تواصل

2 Sept 2026, 22:57 UTC3 viewsread 2 September 2026

طَريقة لحفظِ القرآن الكريم؛ سَتحفظونه كما تحفظون سُورة الفاتحة. هذه الطَّريقة أخذتُها من أحد حَفظة كتاب اللَّه ففي يوم من الأيامِ وأنا...انقر هنا لقراءة المزيد وللانضمام 🎉🌸

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

2 Sept 2026, 10:59 UTC2 viewsread 2 September 2026

إلى كاااااااافة أعضاء القناة يرجى الاشتراك بهذه القناة بسررررعة قبل الحذف📌. https://t.me/Zad_Re https://t.me/Zad_Re ملاحظة الرابط مؤقت سارع بالانضمام🔥.

Signed بوت تواصل

2 Sept 2026, 10:57 UTC2 viewsread 2 September 2026

طَريقة لحفظِ القرآن الكريم؛ سَتحفظونه كما تحفظون سُورة الفاتحة. هذه الطَّريقة أخذتُها من أحد حَفظة كتاب اللَّه ففي يوم من الأيامِ وأنا...انقر هنا لقراءة المزيد وللانضمام 🎉🌸

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

1 Sept 2026, 22:59 UTC2 viewsread 1 September 2026

إلى كاااااااافة أعضاء القناة يرجى الاشتراك بهذه القناة بسررررعة قبل الحذف📌. https://t.me/Zad_Re https://t.me/Zad_Re ملاحظة الرابط مؤقت سارع بالانضمام🔥.

Signed بوت تواصل

1 Sept 2026, 22:57 UTC2 viewsread 1 September 2026

طَريقة لحفظِ القرآن الكريم؛ سَتحفظونه كما تحفظون سُورة الفاتحة. هذه الطَّريقة أخذتُها من أحد حَفظة كتاب اللَّه ففي يوم من الأيامِ وأنا...انقر هنا لقراءة المزيد وللانضمام 🎉🌸

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

1 Sept 2026, 10:59 UTC1 viewsread 1 September 2026

كان الله في عَون كُلّ مَن يَسلُك الطَّرِيق وَحدَهُ، يتألَّم وَحدَهُ، يسقُط.... انقر هنا لقراءة المزيد وللانضمام 🎉🌸

Signed بوت تواصل

1 Sept 2026, 10:57 UTC1 viewsread 1 September 2026

تأسرني كلمة ' دعيتلك ' كلمة حنونة، تهون عليَّ مشقة ما أُعانيه، تُعطيني دافعًا للإستمرار، أن هُناك مَن...انقر هنا لقراءة المزيد وللانضمام 🎉🌸

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

31 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC1 viewsread 31 August 2026

تمت إزالتك ❓❗️

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

Showing the 12 most recent of 204 posts we hold for @oomarr5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

كلمات انجليزي مترجمة
@English742 · 30,597
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نَبـــض ♥️” (@oomarr5), 22,081 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oomarr5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.