National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,419–13,656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:20
13,446
-2
15 Sept 2026, 10:58
13,448
-7
13 Sept 2026, 17:58
13,455
-9
11 Sept 2026, 23:39
13,464
+1
9 Sept 2026, 13:56
13,463
+5
6 Sept 2026, 05:00
13,458
-15
3 Sept 2026, 20:18
13,473
-7
2 Sept 2026, 09:25
13,480
-10
1 Sept 2026, 07:08
13,490
-9
31 Aug 2026, 07:36
13,499
+4
30 Aug 2026, 09:53
13,495
-9
29 Aug 2026, 10:45
13,504
+2
28 Aug 2026, 08:36
13,502
-4
27 Aug 2026, 09:37
13,506
-7
26 Aug 2026, 06:39
13,513
-4
25 Aug 2026, 09:51
13,517
+1
24 Aug 2026, 11:58
13,516
-1
22 Aug 2026, 17:44
13,517
-9
21 Aug 2026, 08:49
13,526
-10
20 Aug 2026, 10:35
13,536
first reading
Engagement
398 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 13,446 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
124
of 398 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
398 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
184,972
Reactions total
14,630
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 44s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
46,895 reactions across 397 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
9,235
19.7%
👍
9,103
19.4%
🤬
5,113
10.9%
🤔
4,575
9.76%
🔥
2,657
5.67%
🤮
2,405
5.13%
❤
1,965
4.19%
🤡
1,754
3.74%
😁
1,627
3.47%
😢
1,600
3.41%
🙏
1,518
3.24%
💩
1,008
2.15%
💔
558
1.19%
🤯
456
0.972%
👏
354
0.755%
👀
318
0.678%
💊
252
0.537%
😡
216
0.461%
🥴
208
0.444%
😱
204
0.435%
40 further kinds
1,769
3.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 397 of the 398 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,895 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀 Офіс Зеленського тиснув на Верховний суд у справі про незаконні санкції проти Порошенка - доведено розслідуванням НАБУ.
Ніна Южаніна оприлюднила нову частину записів Ірини Мудрої, яка підтверджує тиск ОП на суддів Верховного суду.
Спочатку Банкова, зокрема вже колишня заступниця керівника ОП Ірина Мудра сприяла призначенню на посади голови Касаційного адмінсуду у складі Верховного суду такого собі Ігоря Дашутіна.…
✌️Петра Порошенка українці вважають найбільш ефективним Президентом за роки незалежності. Такі дані опитування проведеного на сайті «Апостроф»:
🔷Петро Порошенко — 22,7%;
🔶Володимир Зеленський — 21,34%;
🔷Леонід Кучма — 9,61%;
🔶Віктор Ющенко — 6,24%;
🔷важко відповісти — 5,88%;
🔶Леонід Кравчук — 2,36%.
🔷жодного з них — 31,87%;
👉Як бачимо, апеляція провладної пропаганди до часів "за Порошенка" чи "при Порошенку"…
Уряд каже, що знайшов, де взяти гроші на ЗСУ. Премʼєр Корецький хоче скоротити видатки держбюджету. Резерв для секвестру - 70 млрд. Правда, поки не відомо, які саме видатки будуть обрізати. Тому у мене погане передчуття, що гроші для Міноборони візьмуть у … Міноборони. Тим більше, що Корецький уже заявив про аудит оборонного відомства…
🌐 У кортежі Путіна у Владивостоку було включено пікап із зенітною кулеметом, а вздовж маршруту були виставлені військові та військова техніка. Крім того, Путін вдруге за кілька днів скористався закритим трапом з огорожею під час виходу з літака. Раніше такі конструкції не використовувалися під час його поїздок.
А що поробиш...
ЗСУ всесильне...
Будь-де дістане
Слава ЗСУ!
🌐 Адвокат зниклого командира РДК: "Один з бійців СБУ, який сьогодні відкрив вогонь по "гурівцях", міг бути причетним до вбивства агента ГУР Дениса Кірєєва у 2022 році"
Тарас Боровський зауважив, що наразі це не підтверджена інформація, яка ходить у середовищі Головного управління розвідки. Водночас адвокат закликав громадськість не ставитися до ситуації як "боротьби двох спецслужб" ⤵
Я прошу не надавати цій історії…
✍На тлі вкрай підозрілих подій у Києві між СБУ та ГУР слушно згадати про Дениса Кірєєва — агента Головного управління розвідки, який став жертвою хаосу перших днів великого вторгення росії ⤵
Навесні 2021 року Кирило Буданов залучив банкіра Дениса Кірєєва до ГУР через його зв'язки в рф. Саме Кірєєв вдень 23 лютого 2022 року попередив розвідку, що путін підписав наказ про наступ, а головна ціль — захоплення аеропорту …
🌐 У відповідь на російську диверсію в Лейпцигу, Німеччина передасть Україні нове озброєння.
Зокрема, вже у вересні Німеччина надішле Україні додаткові ракети для систем ППО Iris-T, а також найближчим часом – кілька тисяч ударних безпілотників.
🌐 Путін відвідав суднобудівний комплекс "Звезда" в Приморському краї.
Вранці президент РФ прибув до Владивостока для участі у Східному економічному форумі.
Як я і казав, він тримається подалі від України, бо безстрашний 😄.
Showing the 12 most recent of 398 posts we hold for @peremoga_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦 @bryhynets · 23,834 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
NUSS + @nusspavlo · 21,830 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина @Sofiya_Fedyna · 24,844 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦 @Chornovil_official · 45,909 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
Путч. Русский - нах*й @putch111 · 30,791 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Omelyan News @Omelyan_News · 21,616 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
Україна переможе! 🇺🇦❤️ @porohobotchenko · 21,587 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Дмитро Чекалкин @dmitriy_chekalkyn · 46,568 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Печера Дракона @dragonspech · 39,894 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж @rozumaha · 23,168 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ @zakrytazona · 41,458 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
ГОЛОБУЦЬКИЙ @allgolobutsky · 21,842 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
Андрій Карпов Полтава @vata_show · 26,282 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
Шалений Кіт @Shaleniy_Kit · 22,974 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
ПЕТРУШЕВСЬКИЙ @petrushevskyi · 70,920 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
🇺🇦КУРБАНОВА🇺🇦 @KurbanovaNEWS · 37,310 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
Prozapas @prozapas77 · 38,946 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
УКРАЇНА НАЖИВО 🇺🇦 @UaNazhyvo · 59,854 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
MYROTVORETS NEWS @myrotvoretsnews · 23,944 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
Будем всех бамбить! @budem_bambit · 22,171 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕТЕЛЕМАРАФОН🇺🇦news” (@peremoga_online), 13,446 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peremoga_online.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.