Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СПРАВА ГРОМАД

Channel

СПРАВА ГРОМАД

@spravagromad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,891subscribers

-147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001168031795
TypeChannel
Username@spravagromad
Created2 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/spravagromad

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,89112,03811,964.56 August 2026 — 12,038 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,037 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,034 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,030 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,025 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,020 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,015 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,010 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,008 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,004 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,005 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,996 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,988 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,978 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,977 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,974 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,970 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,967 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,961 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,958 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,954 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,952 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,948 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,945 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,939 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,929 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,918 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,913 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,911 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,899 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,896 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,891 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,869–12,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:3711,891-5
15 Sept 2026, 10:1511,896-3
13 Sept 2026, 19:0111,899-12
12 Sept 2026, 04:2111,911-2
9 Sept 2026, 23:0211,913-5
6 Sept 2026, 18:0211,918-11
4 Sept 2026, 03:0011,929-10
2 Sept 2026, 14:4911,939-6
1 Sept 2026, 15:1211,945-3
31 Aug 2026, 12:0411,948-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:0511,952-2
29 Aug 2026, 13:0511,954-4
28 Aug 2026, 15:4211,958-3
27 Aug 2026, 17:0211,961-6
26 Aug 2026, 15:0311,967-3
25 Aug 2026, 11:3711,970-4
22 Aug 2026, 18:3311,974-3
21 Aug 2026, 12:1311,977-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:3411,978-10
19 Aug 2026, 15:5311,988first reading

Engagement

182 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.69%
avg views ÷ 11,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 182 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held182 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total70,227
Reactions total8,420
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 59m
Average length
3m 09s

Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20,040 reactions across 175 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,20431.0%
👍4,70623.5%
💯4,39621.9%
🔥2,62913.1%
🙏5662.82%
❤‍🔥5312.65%
😢3891.94%
🤬3311.65%
🤔940.469%
😱420.21%
😭270.135%
🤮220.11%
😁180.09%
🤝170.085%
🌚110.055%
💩110.055%
100.05%
👏90.045%
🥰90.045%
🤯80.04%
6 further kinds100.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,662 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:19 UTC406 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🎧 #Музичний_вечір зі Справою громад Valeriia Vovk - Моя Одеса https://youtu.be/yDk1E2W_ODU

35👍10

2 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC541 views141 reactionsread 2 September 2026

​​😾 Олексій ПЕТРОВ: Думки вголос... Довіра до слів влади зараз відображається на полицях продуктових магазинів. Безумовно ж існує здоровий глузд. Так, зміниться логістика. На жаль, піднімуться ціни, але основні продукти харчування навряд чи щезнуть з продажу. Та й можна згадати початок повномасштабного вторгнення, коли нам вибили всі нафтобази. Але ж пальне на АЗС є. Набагато дорожче за ціною ніж до 24 лютого 2022 р

👍103💯2510😢3

2 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC900 views138 reactionsread 2 September 2026

​​❗ Валерій ПРОЗАПАС: Під час тотальних ударів рф по українській інфраструктурі, логістиці та виробництву, серед яких знищуються в тому числі об'єкти Рошен - хорошою демонстрацією єдності могла б стати відміна "санкцій" проти Порошенка, бо по факту він вигрібає і з боку ворога, і від нашої потужної середини, при чому продовжує допомагати ЗСУ на сотні мільйонів. Яка в цих умовах від них вигода крім пУтіна, усвідомит

81💯56🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC≈1,040 views128 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🔷🔶 #Проєкти_важливі і #числа_красиві 🔷🔶 🚿 Ми передали до ЗСУ 364 прально-душових комплексів. І зупинятися не збираємось! ❗ Що кажуть військові про прально-душових комплекси "Справи громад": 🪖 Лазня на фронті є невід'ємною частиною для збереження санітарного стану військовослужбовців та підтримання його 🪖 Це є одною із базових потреб всього особового складу https://youtu.be/jC6JhA3ghIU ℹ️ Докладніше про проєкт:

👍9625💯5❤‍🔥1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 03:41 UTC683 views120 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @GeneralStaffZSUPhoto

Загальні бойові втрати противника з 24.02.22 по 02.09.26 Підписатися на офіційний Telegram-канал Генерального штабу ЗСУ 🇺🇦 Сайт Збройних Сил України

🔥89👍28🙏21

1 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC468 views167 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сьогодні 1 вересня, перший день осені. А дехто ще до зими не почав готуватися, бо був у відпустці. Слуги нарешті вийшли з канікул. Більше місяця вони відпочивали. А у Збройних Сил відпусток немає. У пожежників і рятувальників відпусток немає. У наших ППО, які цієї ночі захищали Київ, відпусток немає. Військовим потрібні і нормальне забезпечення, і відпустки. Тому продовжуємо допомагати нашим військовим. Сьогодні пе

141👍25🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 16:49 UTC517 views141 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @budem_bambitPhoto

Перший прально-душовий комплекс, якщо чесно, був жахливим. Він був навіть не нашим. Нам просто запропонували його придбати та передати військовим. Незручний, недолугий, далекий від ідеалу. Але... він був потрібен. І військові були йому щиро раді. Потім ми вирішили зробити ще кілька. Вже самі. Трохи кращими. Потім ще. Потім ще. Ми постійно збирали відгуки, слухали військових, щось змінювали, переробляли, покращували,

104👍31🔥5❤‍🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 16:19 UTC503 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🎧 #Музичний_вечір зі Справою громад 💙💛 МОЯ ЗЕМЛЕ, УКРАЇНО! 🇺🇦 - Єлизавета Лопушанська https://youtu.be/I3yHQGEOUag

47

1 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC509 views104 reactionsread 1 September 2026

🧐 Віталій ГАЙДУКЕВИЧ: Зеленського розбещує абсолют Коли влада отримує майже абсолютну політичну перевагу, найбільша небезпека — повірити у власну безпомилковість і безкарність. Саме так можна прочитати й досвід 2019 року: величезний кредит довіри Зеленському та монобільшості мав стати інструментом реформ, але тепер дедалі частіше звучить питання — як цим кредитом скористалися і хто відповідатиме за помилки. Слово «

💯99🤔4👍1

1 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC573 views95 reactionsread 1 September 2026

​​😾 Олексій ПЕТРОВ: Я багато чув різної дурні від ноунейм акаунтів і не тільки. Фантазувати соцмережі вміють. Але таке (скріншот внизу) чую вперше. Хоча ні… Не вперше. Саме цю технологію «у міня брат, сват, кум, работаєт в фсб! І вот он сказал, что…», давно використовують спецслужби країни-агресора. Бо в цю обгортку, «брат с фсб сказал», можна загорнути, що завгодно. Зжеруть не розгортаючи… Звісно ж Вова, та його п

💯91👍4

1 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC≈3,730 views115 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

❗️ Розпочинаємо осінь правильно. Із донату на Збройні Сили України. 🇺🇦 🤝 Дякуємо, друзі, за довіру. Саме ВИ рухаєте наші проєкти вперед. Саме завдяки вам ми виконуємо запити військових частин, передаємо необхідне спорядження й допомагаємо нашим захисникам. 🔗 Ми — лише ланка у великому ланцюгу волонтерства. А його сила — у тисячах людей, які щодня обирають не стояти осторонь. 🔥 Кожен ваш внесок подвоює... — спробуй

🙏68👍3413

1 Sept 2026, 04:36 UTC650 views125 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @GeneralStaffZSUPhoto

Загальні бойові втрати противника з 24.02.22 по 01.09.26 Підписатися на офіційний Telegram-канал Генерального штабу ЗСУ 🇺🇦 Сайт Збройних Сил України

🔥101👍192🙏2🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @spravagromad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,960 voters approx.

Так хто знав про фокуси заступниці голови ОП Мудрої?

  1. Ніхто, ОНА САМА10%
  2. Тільки Буданов1%
  3. Тільки Зеленський8%
  4. Зеленський і Буданов66%
  5. ОН (Порошенко)20%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Prozapas
@prozapas77 · 38,946
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Будем всех бамбить!
@budem_bambit · 22,171
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Печера Дракона
@dragonspech · 39,894
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 24,844
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ
@zakrytazona · 41,458
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦
@bryhynets · 23,834
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Шалений Кіт
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,974
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
Путч. Русский - нах*й
@putch111 · 30,791
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦
@Chornovil_official · 45,909
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СПРАВА ГРОМАД” (@spravagromad), 11,891 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spravagromad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.