Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prozapas

Channel

Prozapas

@prozapas77

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,946subscribers

+1,948 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001298794471
TypeChannel
Username@prozapas77
DescriptionМоя оборона
Created28 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prozapas77

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,99839,05638,0276 August 2026 — 36,998 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,003 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,047 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,053 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,066 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,088 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,093 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,086 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,112 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,137 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,180 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,207 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 37,259 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,426 subscribers22 August 2026 — 37,494 subscribers23 August 2026 — 37,606 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,695 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,942 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,063 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,198 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,330 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,494 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,618 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,817 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,843 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,904 subscribers4 September 2026 — 39,056 subscribers7 September 2026 — 39,038 subscribers10 September 2026 — 39,056 subscribers12 September 2026 — 39,019 subscribers14 September 2026 — 38,999 subscribers15 September 2026 — 38,971 subscribers18 September 2026 — 38,946 subscribers38,9466 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,948. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,689–39,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:3738,946-25
15 Sept 2026, 21:0138,971-28
14 Sept 2026, 03:0038,999-20
12 Sept 2026, 12:5739,019-37
10 Sept 2026, 10:1739,056+18
7 Sept 2026, 07:4039,038-18
4 Sept 2026, 10:5739,056+152
2 Sept 2026, 20:5438,904+61
1 Sept 2026, 22:3638,843+26
31 Aug 2026, 23:4938,817+199
31 Aug 2026, 00:5638,618+124
29 Aug 2026, 23:2338,494+164
29 Aug 2026, 02:1338,330+132
28 Aug 2026, 01:4338,198+135
27 Aug 2026, 01:3238,063+121
25 Aug 2026, 23:3437,942+247
25 Aug 2026, 02:1337,695+89
23 Aug 2026, 16:2437,606+112
22 Aug 2026, 00:1437,494+68
20 Aug 2026, 18:3737,426first reading

Engagement

114 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 38,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,290
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 114 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held114 (28 July 202620 September 2026)
Views total488,400
Reactions total68,593
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,340
Videos
423
Links
966

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 24s
Average length
2m 56s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

122,559 reactions across 113 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯65,93553.8%
👍12,0589.84%
11,5719.44%
😁11,0389.01%
🤬5,8894.81%
🤮4,0883.34%
🔥2,3611.93%
🤣2,2831.86%
💩2,0641.68%
😢1,5841.29%
🙏1,2271.00%
🤡9350.763%
👏8650.706%
🤷3050.249%
😱1850.151%
🫡1630.133%
😡80.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123,964 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 06:42 UTC≈2,240 views510 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

👆👆 True story💚

💯363💩100😢24🤮10🤡9😁3🔥1

19 Sept 2026, 06:18 UTC≈4,590 views1,151 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Спочатку забирати з оборони 40 млрд. гривень на е-бакінг, фінансувати "марафони" та позітівних блогерів, а потім розповідати про "чюдовіщний дефіцит коштів на оборону" - цей стиль "нових ліц" з фільмів для дорослих увійде в підручники 🤦‍♂️ І найсмішніше - вони ж через позітівну пропаганду кажуть як нам "Захід мало помогає".

💯1,010🤬72😢526🤮5🔥4👍1🙏1

18 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈8,590 views1,324 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Колись на переговорах з ЄС Порошенко забезпечив українцям можливість літати до Європи лоукостами за 15 євро - а "новиє ліца" допереговорювались до мита на посилки з країн ЄС. Це про ефективніть. В результаті українці платитимуть за чужу некомпетентність і менше донатитимуть на армію - а той же Порошенко попри ганебні "санкції" продовжує допомагати ЗСУ. Це вже про українську справедливість.

👍656💯60532🔥25👏3🫡2🙏1

17 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC≈5,800 views1,240 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Так а на кешбеки? На "єдыный марафон"? На позітівних блогєрів не відклали? Хвилюємось.

💯781🤬369🤡32🤮19😁16👍12😱4😢3

17 Sept 2026, 10:14 UTC≈12,900 views421 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Продовжуємо збір на пікап для розрахунків ударних дронів, залишилась 1/3 необхідної суми! Долучайтесь, небо має бути нашим! 🎯 Ціль: 230 000 ₴ 🔗Посилання на Банку https://send.monobank.ua/jar/5QESeCYoBf 💳Номер картки Банки 4874 1000 3256 7169

232🙏132👍46👏5🔥5🫡1

17 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈7,350 views1,078 reactionsread 20 September 2026

У "чювака" під носом влаштували кримінальне угрупування під дахом прокуратури, з блекджеком, шлюхами, і краденими мільйонами - а воно поїхало до Європи жалітись як НАБУ "несе загрозу демократії". Для них демократія це коли вони на поршах, з сейфами бабла і тусою за кордоном, а "мивсіпрезиденти" слухатють як "Порошенко вобще всьо здав" та щоб не відсвічували "до перемоги". Таку драмеді б на "єдыному марафоні" крутит

💯993👏41👍34😡6😢31

17 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC≈3,970 views945 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Вітаю з ухваленням у Конгресі США законопроєкту про «пекельні санкції» імені сенатора Ліндсі Грема. Це важливе рішення і водночас гідна пам’ять про людину, яка була щиро небайдужою до України, послідовно підтримувала нашу державу та займала сильну позицію проти російського агресора. Для мене було честю знати сенатора Грема особисто. Щиро сподіваюся на швидке підписання законопроєкту Президентом США Дональдом Трампо

🔥506👍31868🙏24👏15🤷6🫡4😁3

16 Sept 2026, 15:28 UTC≈6,630 views1,339 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

👆👆👆 Та ясно, що це Володимир Порошенко, але нашо так нервувати?

😁1,030💯237🔥26🤣26👍6🤮64🤬4

16 Sept 2026, 06:07 UTC≈6,580 views1,132 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

"Кілька років тому Ірина Терех проєктувала міські простори та виробляла вуличні меблі. Сьогодні вона очолює українську компанію Fire Point, яка створює далекобійні дрони, крилаті ракети, а тепер працює й над першою українською балістикою" (с) Це джинса таку мілоту просуває, а от сама пані Ірина сумніви в її компетентності зводить до сексизму, і заявляє, що - "ракети будуються не пенісами" (с) Храни нас Господь.

🤬789😱136😢86💯46🤷27🤮22😁118

15 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC≈4,750 views1,022 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Київ, Одеса, Запоріжжя, Дніпро та багато інших міст живуть під постійними атаками ударних реактивних дронів, від яких немає ефективного захисту. Щодня палають центри логістики, злітають у повітря АЗС та руйнуються великі й малі бізнеси. Змінилася ситуація і на полі бою. Це війна не танків і навіть не дронів, як ми звикли казати. Тепер це — війна технологій. Той, хто попереду в технологіях, той попереду і у війні. К

👍713224🙏63👏9🔥9🫡2💯1🤡1

15 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC≈6,380 views475 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Poll

Хто був ефективнішим Генпрокурором?

  1. Рябошапка1%
  2. Венедіктова1%
  3. Костін0%
  4. Кравченко1%
  5. Луценко98%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💯405👍3511💩8🤷8😁4🔥2🤮1

15 Sept 2026, 06:33 UTC≈10,900 views1,136 reactionsread 19 September 2026

А можна вже хоча б 10 ракет з тих 3000 "фламінгів" імені Штілермана запустити на Москву нарешті, у відповідь на цілолодобове кошмарення Києва? Чи дверні петлі в Епіцентрах закінчились?

💯955👍12118🔥13😁13🤣8😢4👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @prozapas77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTCAnonymous Poll2,560 voters approx.

Хто був ефективнішим Генпрокурором?

  1. Рябошапка1%
  2. Венедіктова1%
  3. Костін0%
  4. Кравченко1%
  5. Луценко98%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTCAnonymous Poll2,090 voters approx.

А ОН про ситуацію в ОГПУ знав чи не знав?

  1. Знав тільки, що їб@ть королев14%
  2. Знав тільки що крадуть мільйони7%
  3. Про все не знав6%
  4. Знав про все79%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll2,040 voters approx.

Так хто знав про фокуси заступниці голови ОП Мудрої?

  1. Ніхто, ОНА САМА10%
  2. Тільки Буданов1%
  3. Тільки Зеленський8%
  4. Зеленський і Буданов66%
  5. ОН (Порошенко)20%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTCAnonymous Poll1,940 voters approx.

Хто більш продажний та аморальний?

  1. Актриси німецьких порнофільмів1%
  2. Сергій Лещенко99%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Березовый сок
@BerezaJuice · 144,299
#1
Дмитро Чекалкин
@dmitriy_chekalkyn · 46,568
#2
Печера Дракона
@dragonspech · 39,894
#3
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦
@bryhynets · 23,834
#4
Путч. Русский - нах*й
@putch111 · 30,791
#5
Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 96,827
#6
Шалений Кіт
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,974
#7
Цензор.НЕТ | Новини України та світу, війна та аналітика
@censor_net · 183,762
#8
MYROTVORETS NEWS
@myrotvoretsnews · 23,944
#9
ГЕРАЩЕНКО ІРИНА
@irynagerashchenko · 18,667
#10
Фашик Донецький
@gistapapapa · 104,844
#11
ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS
@Tsaplienko · 321,452
#12
NUSS +
@nusspavlo · 21,830
#13
Горковенко live
@VVgorkovenko · 12,511
#14
👀Прозріваю 🇺🇦
@zelenicholovichky · 5,009
#15
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦
@deepstateua · 761,011
#16
Victoria Joy 🇺🇦
@victoriajoy21 · 3,331
#17
Монова
@monovaolena · 33,473
#18
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ
@zakrytazona · 41,458
#19
Олег Леусенко
@oleg_leusenko · 5,173
#20
Будем всех бамбить!
@budem_bambit · 22,171
#21
ПП!: пора перемагати
@aschotamupp · 2,662
#22
Маршал 🔥✊️🇺🇦
@marshalvdv · 95,839
#23
Александр Коваленко
@zloyodessit · 82,374
#24
𝑺𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒔𝒌𝒂 🇺🇦
@sam_svit · 8,678
#25
СПРАВА ГРОМАД
@spravagromad · 11,891
#26
ГОЛОБУЦЬКИЙ
@allgolobutsky · 21,842
#27
Андрій Карпов Полтава
@vata_show · 26,282
#28
Процишин офіційний
@ProtsyshynOfficial · 9,064
#29
Ігор Рейтерович | REITERS 🇺🇦
@reiters · 10,492
#30
Министерство П
@TruthMinistry · 18,293
#31
<Команданте ЗЕгевара>
@zegevar · 2,983
#32
🇺🇦КУРБАНОВА🇺🇦
@KurbanovaNEWS · 37,310
#33
Скріни не горять
@fixators · 1,301
#34
ПЕТРУШЕВСЬКИЙ
@petrushevskyi · 70,920
#35
KNPU 🇺🇦 ✙ moscovia delenda est
@knputhebest · 10,174
#36
Новини Еспресо.TV
@espresotb · 50,508
#37
Валерій Калниш | Чорна лампа 🇺🇦
@blacklampa · 11,240
#38
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира
@D7_channel · 35,208
#39
🇺🇦Дафа: не бійся, бийся
@DaphniaBlog · 10,569
#40
Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦
@Chornovil_official · 45,909
#41
💥BEREZOVIEW (Taras Berezovets) WAR IN UKRAINE
@berezoview · 141,090
#42
Babchenko
@babchenko77 · 80,512
#43
Irritable Orc
@IrritableOrcChannel · 8,041
#44
Анатолій Штефан "Штірліц"
@a_shtirlitz · 138,200
#45
НЕТЕЛЕМАРАФОН🇺🇦news
@peremoga_online · 13,446
#46
ЗЕ зрада🕵️
@zelyazradnik · 10,621
#47
БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС
@ButusovPlus · 348,268
#48
Андрій Смолій
@smolii_ukraine · 504,040
#49
Червінський
@RomanChervinskyi · 14,320
#50
Портников
@portnikov · 68,852
#51
YIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 219,263
#52
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко
@gudymenko_official · 38,810
#53
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж
@rozumaha · 23,168
#54
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614
#55
Libertatem
@libertatemua · 2,760
#56
InformNapalm
@informnapalm · 131,529
#57
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 24,844
#58
STERNENKO
@ssternenko · 882,036
#59
Європейська Солідарність
@officialeurosolidarity · 19,523
#60
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер
@voinasordoy · 200,967
#61
Omelyan News
@Omelyan_News · 21,616
#62
Денис Казанський
@kazansky2017 · 149,177
#63
Валерій Залужний
@Zaluzhnui · 236,380
#64
Березовий Джем
@bereza_jam · 20,121
#65
Антон ШВЕЦЬ (Шуецький канал)
@readshvets · 22,005
#66
Останній Капіталіст ✙
@OstanniyCapitalist · 118,352
#67
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
@kpszsu · 905,765
#68
УКРАЇНА НАЖИВО 🇺🇦
@UaNazhyvo · 59,854
#69
Padre Poltava
@padrePoltava · 12,454
#70
ДИВОСКРИНЯ🇺🇦
@ta_rozslabsya_vzhe · 4,677
#71
Американський 🚀 піхотинець
@usinfantryman1 · 91,878
#72
Не Олексій
@notnets · 27,463
#73
Крінжарня 🤡
@trashikrinzh · 13,684
#74
Історія України 🇺🇦 ЗСУ ❤️
@istoriya_ukrainy · 75,667
#75
Roman Donik
@romandonik · 21,733
#76
Max Gadyukin
@maxgadyukin · 10,514
#77
ЗОЛА
@LapinFromUkraine · 13,677
#78
Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 171,981
#79
РАША-П∆-РАША🏳️‍🌈
@smertvorogam · 9,356
#80
Залізний нардеп
@yzheleznyak · 97,710
#81
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,514
#82

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Шалений Кіт
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,974
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦
@bryhynets · 23,834
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Путч. Русский - нах*й
@putch111 · 30,791
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Балакаємо українською MovaSpark
@speakinua · 30,630
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
MYROTVORETS NEWS
@myrotvoretsnews · 23,944
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
Андрій Карпов Полтава
@vata_show · 26,282
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 24,844
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
Монова
@monovaolena · 33,473
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
ПЕТРУШЕВСЬКИЙ
@petrushevskyi · 70,920
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
🇺🇦КУРБАНОВА🇺🇦
@KurbanovaNEWS · 37,310
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж
@rozumaha · 23,168
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Портников
@portnikov · 68,852
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prozapas” (@prozapas77), 38,946 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prozapas77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.