Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prozapas

Channel

Prozapas

@prozapas77

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,827subscribers

+1,829 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001298794471
TypeChannel
Username@prozapas77
DescriptionМоя оборона
Created28 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prozapas77

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

36,99839,05638,0276 August 2026 — 36,998 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,003 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,047 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,053 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,066 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,088 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,093 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,086 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,112 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,137 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,180 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,207 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 37,259 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,426 subscribers22 August 2026 — 37,494 subscribers23 August 2026 — 37,606 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,695 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,942 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,063 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,198 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,330 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,494 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,618 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,817 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,843 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,904 subscribers4 September 2026 — 39,056 subscribers7 September 2026 — 39,038 subscribers10 September 2026 — 39,056 subscribers12 September 2026 — 39,019 subscribers14 September 2026 — 38,999 subscribers15 September 2026 — 38,971 subscribers18 September 2026 — 38,946 subscribers1 October 2026 — 38,759 subscribers6 October 2026 — 38,732 subscribers10 October 2026 — 38,753 subscribers13 October 2026 — 38,696 subscribers15 October 2026 — 38,677 subscribers16 October 2026 — 38,638 subscribers17 October 2026 — 38,614 subscribers18 October 2026 — 38,590 subscribers19 October 2026 — 38,599 subscribers20 October 2026 — 38,607 subscribers21 October 2026 — 38,646 subscribers22 October 2026 — 38,629 subscribers23 October 2026 — 38,630 subscribers24 October 2026 — 38,617 subscribers25 October 2026 — 38,597 subscribers26 October 2026 — 38,623 subscribers27 October 2026 — 38,625 subscribers28 October 2026 — 38,623 subscribers29 October 2026 — 38,617 subscribers29 October 2026 — 38,604 subscribers30 October 2026 — 38,610 subscribers31 October 2026 — 38,627 subscribers1 November 2026 — 38,608 subscribers2 November 2026 — 38,676 subscribers3 November 2026 — 38,760 subscribers4 November 2026 — 38,827 subscribers38,8276 August 20264 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net +1,829. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,689–39,365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 15:2438,827+67
3 Nov 2026, 17:2138,760+84
2 Nov 2026, 13:4938,676+68
1 Nov 2026, 15:2638,608-19
31 Oct 2026, 17:5838,627+17
30 Oct 2026, 19:5938,610+6
29 Oct 2026, 21:5538,604-13
29 Oct 2026, 01:1938,617-6
28 Oct 2026, 01:4738,623-2
27 Oct 2026, 00:5638,625+2
26 Oct 2026, 03:5138,623+26
25 Oct 2026, 04:4038,597-20
24 Oct 2026, 07:4838,617-13
23 Oct 2026, 10:3738,630+1
22 Oct 2026, 10:1138,629-17
21 Oct 2026, 02:0838,646+39
20 Oct 2026, 02:5138,607+8
19 Oct 2026, 02:0038,599+9
18 Oct 2026, 04:5638,590-24
17 Oct 2026, 02:5638,614first reading

Engagement

208 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 38,827 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,000
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 208 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held208 (28 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total520,220
Reactions total67,325
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 10:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,400
Videos
≈436
Links
≈977

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
2m 45s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

226,686 reactions across 207 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯116,02151.2%
👍21,2709.38%
❤20,0948.86%
😁18,5908.20%
🤬15,2616.73%
🤮13,6716.03%
😢5,0002.21%
💩4,1011.81%
🔥2,9351.29%
🤣2,9061.28%
🤡2,5821.14%
🙏1,8220.804%
👏1,1210.495%
🤷7080.312%
😱3060.135%
🫡2670.118%
😡310.014%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 208 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228,091 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 65 posts held from the last 30 days (12.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,170 views129 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Триває збір на на ремонт автівок артилерії - просимо долучитись! Вдячність з дорог Донбасу🇺🇦 🎯Ціль: 53 000.00 ₴ 🔗Посилання на Банку https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3dxp8sP7CG 💳Номер картки Банки 4874 1000 3470 5692

🙏87❤24👍16🫡2

5 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC≈2,090 views512 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ще раз, пряма мова СЕО FP 👇👇👇 "Балістику ми почали розробляти до крилатої ракети. Але це як би певний ітераційний шлях, який складний, і він не швидкий, і ми вирішили давайте поки ми робимо це, ми зробимо щось простіше, що нам зрозуміліше, і на що у нас більше досвіду. Так з'явилась Фламінго. ‌І‌ ‌я‌ ‌д‌у‌м‌а‌ю‌,‌ ‌щ‌о‌ ‌в‌о‌н‌а‌ ‌н‌а‌б‌а‌г‌а‌т‌о‌ ‌в‌а‌ж‌л‌и‌в‌і‌ш‌а‌ ‌б‌у‌л‌а‌ ‌ ‌я‌к‌ ‌п‌о‌л‌і‌т‌и‌ч‌н‌и‌й‌ ‌с‌т‌е‌й‌…

💯415🤬81👍7🤮4😢4🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈8,220 views1,044 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

"Ракета Фламінго була важливіша як політичний стейтмент, а не якась супер-пупер вандервафля", - продовжує свій перформанс "молода талановита" директорка FP. І додає, що "не плануємо більше на сьогоднішній день крилатих ракет" (с) Епоха "3000 ракет" закінчилась, так і не розпочавшись, і мені дуже цікаво як це прокоментують свідки "літають з петлями з Епіцентру? попадають? не мішайте!". Що це було, шановні? Чого "б…

💯799🤬182🤮31😢11❤7👍5😱3🔥2

3 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC≈5,320 views516 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😁298🤮191💯23🤷4

3 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈5,420 views1,143 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Скрипін так довго працював над перетворенням суспільства в гуппі, що схоже сам втратив пам'ять - і тепер обурюється, що "блядям похуй!" Але ми знаємо це ще з 2019 року, Роман Андрійович, ми знаємо. Дякуємо за таку самокритику, продовжуйте💚

💯952👍118😁40🤮18❤6🤣4💩3👏1

3 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC≈5,520 views1,106 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В Криму зрадили 90% силовиків та 70% військових - але позитивній пропаганді ротом Стецьківа вистачає цинізму просувати звинувачення, що "надо було воювать". Тільки в цю гру можна грати вдвох. В Маріуполі, Бердянську, Мелітополі і близко не було такої катастрофічної зради, і про напад попереджали за півроку. Питання до колективного Стецьківа - де Маріуполь, Бердянськ і Мелітополь?

💯1,030👍58🤬11🔥3❤2😢2

2 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC≈4,980 views321 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @IrritableOrcChannelPhoto

⬇️⬇️⬇️ Этот — теперь уже вдвойне уникальный — артефакт может стать вашим в ходе лотереи. Как и другие прекрасные призы, все как один посвящённые ДШВ. https://shop.spgr.org.ua/blahodiinyi-rozihrash-46-do-dnia-dshv/ Let's go. Зачем вам те сто гривень или две тысячи, они вам не осветят квартиру при блэкауте, зато флаг согреет сердце. #орк_волонтёрит

👍242❤65🔥10😱4

2 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC≈4,440 views334 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @IrritableOrcChannel

Ситуація наразі наступна. В воскресенье день ДШВ. Мы любим ДШВ. Вы любите ДШВ. Все любят ДШВ. Нельзя не любить ДШВ. По такому случаю "Справа громад" делает лотерею, посвящённую этой прекрасной дате, то есть 8-му ноября, то есть дню ДШВ. И мы там разыгрываем всякое прекрасное, и уже в пятницу разыгрываем, то есть чисто теоретически можно день ДШВ уже встретить с призом, если конечно Новая почта, но мы все понимаем …

❤221👍84💯19🤷6🔥3🤮1

2 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC≈4,920 views699 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Рубріка - "Де американські кунги"???

💯485🔥111🤮60👍15🤬10😁10😢5👏3

2 Nov 2026, 07:23 UTC≈5,070 views358 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Артилерії потрібна допомога на ремонт автівок - просимо долучитись! Вдячність з дорог Донбасу🇺🇦 🎯Ціль: 53 000.00 ₴ 🔗Посилання на Банку https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3dxp8sP7CG 💳Номер картки Банки 4874 1000 3470 5692

🙏251❤69👍25🫡10🔥2🤡1

1 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC≈5,300 views1,030 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @european_solidarity_zp

Не думали раніше - от і доводиться "жать руку обнімать" російського чиновника, щоби врятувати людей з Олешок. Гидко, що цю трагедію українців по повній використають політичні гієни з різних сторін, а особливо Кремль. І ще огидніше, що зупинки вогню та гуманітарної місії насправді потребують десятки (якщо не сотні) українських населенних пунктів, де люди голодують, замерзають і гинуть - але слова про це у нас оголош…

💯926👍61😢22🔥12❤8🫡1

1 Nov 2026, 07:33 UTC≈13,400 views1,121 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Переважна більшість з тих, хто зі зітханнями робить вигляд, що турбується про "рейтинг Порошенка", чомусь не згадує про "превентивні санкції", і що станом на зараз йому заборонено навіть відкрити рахунок в банку, а не те що думати про реалізацію "рейтингів". Ви прискіпливо вишукуєте "тези російської пропаганди" в словах неприємних вам політиків - а запровадження в Україні прямих путінськіх практик чомусь ігноруєте. …

💯1,050👍55🔥8❤6🤬2

Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @prozapas77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @prozapas77 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
21 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTCAnonymous Poll2,490 voters approx.

Чи вигідне Україні енергетичне перемир'я?

  1. Так, попереду зима32%
  2. Ні, треба добивати енергетику ворога69%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTCAnonymous Poll2,570 voters approx.

Хто був ефективнішим Генпрокурором?

  1. Рябошапка1%
  2. Венедіктова1%
  3. Костін0%
  4. Кравченко1%
  5. Луценко98%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTCAnonymous Poll2,090 voters approx.

А ОН про ситуацію в ОГПУ знав чи не знав?

  1. Знав тільки, що їб@ть королев14%
  2. Знав тільки що крадуть мільйони7%
  3. Про все не знав6%
  4. Знав про все79%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll2,040 voters approx.

Так хто знав про фокуси заступниці голови ОП Мудрої?

  1. Ніхто, ОНА САМА10%
  2. Тільки Буданов1%
  3. Тільки Зеленський8%
  4. Зеленський і Буданов66%
  5. ОН (Порошенко)20%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTCAnonymous Poll1,940 voters approx.

Хто більш продажний та аморальний?

  1. Актриси німецьких порнофільмів1%
  2. Сергій Лещенко99%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Березовый сок
@BerezaJuice · 143,492
#1
Дмитро Чекалкин
@dmitriy_chekalkyn · 45,793
#2
Печера Дракона
@dragonspech · 41,226
#3
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦
@bryhynets · 23,580
#4
Путч. Русский - нах*й
@putch111 · 32,194
#5
Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 97,584
#6
Шалений Кіт
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,667
#7
Цензор.НЕТ | Новини України та світу, війна та аналітика
@censor_net · 185,124
#8
MYROTVORETS NEWS
@myrotvoretsnews · 24,015
#9
ГЕРАЩЕНКО ІРИНА
@irynagerashchenko · 18,412
#10
Фашик Донецький
@gistapapapa · 104,010
#11
ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS
@Tsaplienko · 320,216
#12
NUSS +
@nusspavlo · 21,116
#13
Горковенко live
@VVgorkovenko · 13,865
#14
👀Прозріваю 🇺🇦
@zelenicholovichky · 4,943
#15
✙DeepState✙🇺🇦
@deepstateua · 752,873
#16
Victoria Joy 🇺🇦
@victoriajoy21 · 3,263
#17
Монова
@monovaolena · 33,698
#18
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ
@zakrytazona · 42,835
#19
Олег Леусенко
@oleg_leusenko · 5,126
#20
Будем всех бамбить!
@budem_bambit · 20,675
#21
ПП!: пора перемагати
@aschotamupp · 2,624
#22
Маршал 🔥✊️🇺🇦
@marshalvdv · 93,499
#23
Александр Коваленко
@zloyodessit · 81,437
#24
𝑺𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒔𝒌𝒂 🇺🇦
@sam_svit · 8,674
#25
СПРАВА ГРОМАД
@spravagromad · 11,740
#26
ГОЛОБУЦЬКИЙ
@allgolobutsky · 23,325
#27
Андрій Карпов
@vata_show · 27,176
#28
Процишин офіційний
@ProtsyshynOfficial · 8,922
#29
Ігор Рейтерович | REITERS 🇺🇦
@reiters · 11,428
#30
Министерство П
@TruthMinistry · 18,676
#31
<Команданте ЗЕгевара>
@zegevar · 2,971
#32
🇺🇦КУРБАНОВА🇺🇦
@KurbanovaNEWS · 36,607
#33
Скріни не горять
@fixators · 1,299
#34
ПЕТРУШЕВСЬКИЙ
@petrushevskyi · 69,850
#35
KNPU 🇺🇦 ✙ moscovia delenda est
@knputhebest · 10,011
#36
Новини Еспресо.TV
@espresotb · 50,071
#37
Валерій Калниш | Чорна лампа 🇺🇦
@blacklampa · 11,249
#38
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира
@D7_channel · 35,089
#39
🇺🇦Дафа: не бійся, бийся
@DaphniaBlog · 10,311
#40
Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦
@Chornovil_official · 45,916
#41
💥BEREZOVIEW (Taras Berezovets) WAR IN UKRAINE
@berezoview · 140,434
#42
Babchenko
@babchenko77 · 80,564
#43
Irritable Orc
@IrritableOrcChannel · 7,894
#44
Анатолій Штефан "Штірліц"
@a_shtirlitz · 136,142
#45
НЕТЕЛЕМАРАФОН🇺🇦news
@peremoga_online · 13,427
#46
ЗЕ зрада🕵️
@zelyazradnik · 10,561
#47
БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС
@ButusovPlus · 348,385
#48
Андрій Смолій
@smolii_ukraine · 523,409
#49
Червінський
@RomanChervinskyi · 14,369
#50
Портников
@portnikov · 68,918
#51
YIGAL LEVIN
@yigal_levin · 218,646
#52
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко
@gudymenko_official · 38,433
#53
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж
@rozumaha · 24,335
#54
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,003,159
#55
Libertatem
@libertatemua · 2,695
#56
InformNapalm
@informnapalm · 132,544
#57
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 23,770
#58
STERNENKO
@ssternenko · 880,895
#59
Європейська Солідарність
@officialeurosolidarity · 19,380
#60
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер
@voinasordoy · 200,337
#61
Omelyan News
@Omelyan_News · 21,624
#62
Денис Казанський
@kazansky2017 · 149,298
#63
Валерій Залужний
@Zaluzhnui · 240,277
#64
Березовий Джем
@bereza_jam · 20,418
#65
Антон ШВЕЦЬ (Шуецький канал)
@readshvets · 21,803
#66
Останній Капіталіст ✙
@OstanniyCapitalist · 118,368
#67
Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
@kpszsu · 941,283
#68
УКРАЇНА НАЖИВО 🇺🇦
@UaNazhyvo · 59,091
#69
Padre Poltava
@padrePoltava · 12,291
#70
ДИВОСКРИНЯ🇺🇦
@ta_rozslabsya_vzhe · 4,581
#71
Американський 🚀 піхотинець
@usinfantryman1 · 90,337
#72
Не Олексій
@notnets · 28,117
#73
Крінжарня 🤡
@trashikrinzh · 13,548
#74
Історія України 🇺🇦 ЗСУ ❤️
@istoriya_ukrainy · 76,077
#75
Roman Donik
@romandonik · 21,397
#76
Max Gadyukin
@maxgadyukin · 10,295
#77
ЗОЛА
@LapinFromUkraine · 14,226
#78
Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 170,209
#79
РАША-П∆-РАША🏳️‍🌈
@smertvorogam · 9,147
#80
Залізний нардеп
@yzheleznyak · 101,199
#81
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 304,389
#82

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Шалений Кіт
@Shaleniy_Kit · 22,667
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
Будем всех бамбить!
@budem_bambit · 20,675
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦
@bryhynets · 23,580
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Путч. Русский - нах*й
@putch111 · 32,194
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
NUSS +
@nusspavlo · 21,116
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
Балакаємо українською MovaSpark
@speakinua · 30,188
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
MYROTVORETS NEWS
@myrotvoretsnews · 24,015
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
ГОЛОБУЦЬКИЙ
@allgolobutsky · 23,325
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
Андрій Карпов
@vata_show · 27,176
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
Європейська Солідарність
@officialeurosolidarity · 19,380
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
Україна переможе! 🇺🇦❤️
@porohobotchenko · 21,747
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина
@Sofiya_Fedyna · 23,770
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
Березовий Джем
@bereza_jam · 20,418
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
Монова
@monovaolena · 33,698
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Omelyan News
@Omelyan_News · 21,624
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
ПЕТРУШЕВСЬКИЙ
@petrushevskyi · 69,850
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
🇺🇦КУРБАНОВА🇺🇦
@KurbanovaNEWS · 36,607
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж
@rozumaha · 24,335
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Портников
@portnikov · 68,918
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prozapas” (@prozapas77), 38,827 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prozapas77.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.