Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔵Психологія з МПА🔵

Channel

🔵Психологія з МПА🔵

@psy_mpa_ua

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,285subscribers

+157 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001776362051
TypeChannel
Username@psy_mpa_ua
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psy_mpa_ua

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,10122,28522,1937 August 2026 — 22,128 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,135 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,136 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,127 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,128 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,125 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,144 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,137 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,120 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,117 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,122 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,109 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,102 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,101 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,112 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,115 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,113 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,115 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,111 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,115 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,124 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,145 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,155 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,178 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,191 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22,198 subscribers10 September 2026 — 22,229 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,235 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,248 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,279 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,285 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net +157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,073–22,313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:3722,285+6
16 Sept 2026, 06:1922,279+31
14 Sept 2026, 09:5822,248+13
12 Sept 2026, 16:5722,235+6
10 Sept 2026, 14:2122,229+31
7 Sept 2026, 10:1922,198+7
4 Sept 2026, 12:4122,191+13
3 Sept 2026, 00:3722,178+23
1 Sept 2026, 22:5722,155+10
31 Aug 2026, 21:4822,145+21
30 Aug 2026, 21:4722,124+9
29 Aug 2026, 20:0222,115+4
28 Aug 2026, 22:0622,111-4
27 Aug 2026, 21:4322,115+2
26 Aug 2026, 22:3522,113-2
26 Aug 2026, 00:5622,115+3
25 Aug 2026, 02:0922,112+11
23 Aug 2026, 15:1722,101-1
22 Aug 2026, 03:0922,102-7
20 Aug 2026, 19:4522,109first reading

Engagement

199 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.98%
avg views ÷ 22,285 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 199 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held199 (4 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total206,860
Reactions total2,210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 14s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,075 reactions across 197 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,99378.7%
🔥3667.21%
👍3466.82%
❤‍🔥1042.05%
😁891.75%
💯651.28%
👏470.926%
🎉200.394%
🙏160.315%
🤔70.138%
🥰70.138%
🤝60.118%
💔30.059%
💘20.039%
🌚10.02%
🏆10.02%
😢10.02%
🦄10.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 199 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,075 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,360 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

👩‍🎓 ВЖЕ СЬОГОДНІ О 16:00 СУПЕРВІЗІЙНА ГРУПА від МПА 🇺🇦 🔵 СУПЕРВІЗІЯ: розбір кейсів на тему тривоги та роботи з тривожними клієнтами 🔥залишилося останні три місяця 🔥 👩‍🎓 Супервізант — Яна Кобець, практикуючий психолог, гештальт-консультант, травматерапевт. ✅3 вересня 16:00–18:00 год. ✅Онлайн програма Zoom 💻 🔹 Розбір 3 реальних кейсів 🔹 Можливість поставити запитання та отримати професійний зворотний зв’язок 🔹 Жив

5🤝1

3 Sept 2026, 04:32 UTC≈1,740 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Міжнародна психологічна асоціація| Підписатися МПА 🇺🇦

33👍9

2 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,390 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

Колеги, ви просила презентацію з вебінару МОЗОК В РЕЖИМІ ХРОНІЧНОЇ НЕБЕЗПЕКИ. НАСЛІДКИ.ТЕХНІКИ САМОДОПОМОГИ." з психологинею Ольгою Шабловською 🎓 Надсилаємо ✅ Хай допомагає вам в роботі😌

74🔥5

2 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,190 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

✅💻ЗАПИС вебінару ✅💻 МОЗОК В РЕЖИМІ ХРОНІЧНОЇ НЕБЕЗПЕКИ. НАСЛІДКИ.ТЕХНІКИ САМОДОПОМОГИ." з психологинею Ольгою Шабловською 🎓 📌 https://www.youtube.com/live/KIbw-Y2WLrw?si=oFmJ25bs140ws42a Усі хто замовляв Сертифікати відправляємо, протягом декількох годин буде 🫶

35🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,900 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💻✅Анонс курсів з психології 💻✅ від МПА 🇺🇦 🔵3.09. СУПЕРВІЗІЯ. РОЗБІР КЕЙСІВ НА ТЕМУ ТРИВОГИ та роботи з тривожними клієнтами" https://forms.gle/PEq66DRNtWBYsPit9 🔵8.09. Психологічне консультування на глибинних рівнях" https://forms.gle/U1wyB8vYh8z8cGVH7 🔵11.09. "Тривожні стани та розлади. Психологічний супровід " https://forms.gle/V1eUKFARu2YcuS5K6 🔵 19.09. "АРТТЕРАПІЯ. Теорія та практика" https://forms.gle/V5Js3N

9

2 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,660 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔔👤🤩 Хочете почуватися впевнено під час консультації? Курс "Психологічне консультування на глибинних рівнях" – це курс щоб: ✔️отримати практичні інструменти, техніки, вправи, алгоритми ✔️зрозуміти, як працювати з глибинними переживаннями, ✔️ Сертифікат "Психолог-консультант". Ви навчитесь: ✔️ будувати консультацію від початку до завершення ✔️ працювати з сильними почуттями та кризовими моментами ✔️ поєднувати консуль

7👍2🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,770 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎬 Колеги,хто запитував 📌 У нас буде ЗАПИС вебінару МОЗОК В РЕЖИМІ ХРОНІЧНОЇ НЕБЕЗПЕКИ. НАСЛІДКИ.ТЕХНІКИ САМОДОПОМОГИ." (буде в YouTube) надішлемо сюди в групу після завершення Хто бажає отримати електронний Сертифікат (вартість 280 грн 🍀) Реєстрація тут 📝 https://forms.gle/VjMkpSkyk38jPmog8

22👍1

2 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,930 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Колеги розпочали вебінар в YouTube 📌 https://www.youtube.com/live/KIbw-Y2WLrw?si=oFmJ25bs140ws42a

10🔥4

2 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,930 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Колеги, 2 хв розпочинаємо ✅ Скинемо посилання 📝

13

2 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC≈2,170 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📌 Посилання на вебінар надішлемо сьогодні о 16:00 📌 "МОЗОК В РЕЖИМІ ХРОНІЧНОЇ НЕБЕЗПЕКИ. НАСЛІДКИ.ТЕХНІКИ САМОДОПОМОГИ."📝🎓📚 🔔Через велику кількість учасників проводимо лише у YouTube 🔔 🎬✅ Запис вебінару (буде в YouTube) надішлемо сюди в групу після завершення Хто бажає отримати електронний Сертифікат (вартість 280 грн 🍀) Реєстрація тут 📝 https://forms.gle/VjMkpSkyk38jPmog8

16💯1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,350 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🤔📝 ЧОМУ МИ УНИКАЄМО ТОГО, ЧОГО НАСПРАВДІ ХОЧЕМО? Іноді ми дуже хочемо чогось, але все одно відкладаємо, мовчимо, не робимо перший крок або відмовляємося від можливості. Часто за цим стоїть страх. Боїмося невдачі і навіть не пробуємо. У цей момент стає легше. Наче ми захистили себе від неприємних переживань. Але разом із цим можемо втратити щось важливе: близькість, нові можливості, розвиток або можливість бути п

28🔥5

2 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTC≈2,190 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

19

Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @psy_mpa_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTCAnonymous Poll231 voters

🔵 СТАРТУЮТЬ ТЕМАТИЧНІ СУПЕРВІЗІЙНІ ГРУПИ В МПА

  1. Робота з травмою та ПТСР45%
  2. Тривога, панічні атаки45%
  3. Втрати та горювання33%
  4. Депресивні стани41%
  5. Межі та складні стосунки29%
  6. Контрперенос і труднощі психолога27%
  7. Сімейні конфлікти30%
  8. Батьківсько-дитячі конфлікти30%
  9. Інше — напишіть свій варіант у коментарях1%

The shares total 281%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Скрипник Євген Доказовий лікар
@skripnik_evgen · 37,410
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Ненудна психологія 🎭
@psychology_uk · 33,794
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔵Психологія з МПА🔵” (@psy_mpa_ua), 22,285 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_mpa_ua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.