Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QuickNRap

Channel

QuickNRap

@quicknrapp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,117subscribers

-164 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793763396
TypeChannel
Username@quicknrapp
Created18 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/quicknrapp

Growth

22,11722,28122,1996 August 2026 — 22,281 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,268 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,264 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,258 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,254 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,244 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,243 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,244 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,245 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,241 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,232 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,214 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,209 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,201 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,192 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,166 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,165 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,154 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,148 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,147 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,143 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,142 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,137 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,117 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 27 days, net -164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,092–22,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 12:1522,117-20
31 Aug 2026, 13:5522,137-5
30 Aug 2026, 16:5822,142-1
29 Aug 2026, 18:4622,143-4
28 Aug 2026, 19:1822,147-1
27 Aug 2026, 22:2522,148-6
26 Aug 2026, 23:2722,154-11
25 Aug 2026, 22:1822,165-1
24 Aug 2026, 22:4422,166-26
23 Aug 2026, 06:3422,192-9
20 Aug 2026, 15:4222,201-8
19 Aug 2026, 13:3222,209-5
18 Aug 2026, 15:4222,214-18
17 Aug 2026, 16:5822,232-9
16 Aug 2026, 14:2322,241-4
14 Aug 2026, 21:2322,245+1
13 Aug 2026, 12:0822,244+1
12 Aug 2026, 09:0222,243-1
11 Aug 2026, 11:4522,244-10
10 Aug 2026, 12:1022,254first reading

Engagement

214 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 22,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,450
214 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
214
of 214 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held214 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total524,640
Reactions total11,912
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 18m
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 99 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,912 reactions across 214 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,22660.7%
😁9397.88%
❤‍🔥8016.72%
🔥7886.62%
👎6795.70%
😭4183.51%
👍3793.18%
🕊3092.59%
🤯770.646%
🥴710.596%
💔610.512%
🙏590.495%
🤬330.277%
💯270.227%
🍓140.118%
😍140.118%
😐90.076%
🤔30.025%
😈20.017%
😎20.017%
1 further kind10.008%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 214 of the 214 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,912 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 214 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @quicknrapp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 214 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.467%
1 of 214 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,160
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,540
over 213 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHWDLxq111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 214 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC512 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📸 Playboi Carti и испанская певица Arca 🥤QuickNRap

🥴133

2 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,510 views66 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🥹 В сети всплыл старый твит Ken Carson, где 14-летний Кен поздравляет свою крашиху Зендаю с 18-летием Batman vs Spider-Man. 🥤QuickNRap

😁548😍4

2 Sept 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,050 views65 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video

💔 Когда Trippie Redd чуть не расплакался, услышав голос фаната 1 В 1 как у XXXTentacion Однажды Trippie встретил парня в прямом эфире, чей голос был невероятно похож на голос его ушедшего из жизни друга. Trippie настолько удивился сходству, что признался, что может расплакаться, потому что скучает по голосу X. После этого он попросил парня зачитать фристайл и не мог поверить, насколько тот похож на XXXTentacion по

63👍2

1 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC≈2,530 views82 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😤 A$AP Rocky записывает новую музыку даже в туре Ждёте новый альбом? 🥤QuickNRap

78👎4

1 Sept 2026, 16:44 UTC≈2,720 views67 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🤪 Возбуждённый Travis Scott на матче по теннису Артист пришёл посмотреть матч Карлоса Алькараса во второй день US Open 2026 в полном образе Cactus Jack x Nike. 🥤QuickNRap

53🔥8❤‍🔥6

1 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC≈2,730 views57 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

👀 ВСЕ частные адвокаты отказались от D4vd Теперь певца будет защищать государственный адвокат. Причина ухода его прежних адвокатов пока не раскрывается. D4vd свою вину не признаёт. 🥤QuickNRap

😁515❤‍🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,630 views58 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🤝 Don Toliver пригласил Drake на сцену во время своего солд-аут шоу в Торонто Это первое в истории выступление Drake на арене с треками из «ICEMAN». 🥤QuickNRap

🔥489👍1

1 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,760 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🎉 ПРАВОСУДИЕ НАД УБИЙЦЕЙ 2PAC ВОСТОРЖЕСТВОВАЛО! Дуэйна «Keffe D» Дэвиса признали виновным в организации убийства 2Pac. Сам он не стрелял, но, по версии прокуратуры, именно Дэвис организовал месть и передал оружие после конфликта Тупака с его племянником. Дело во многом строилось на собственных словах Дэвиса о том, что он находился в белом Cadillac, из которого были произведены выстрелы. Спустя почти 30 лет это пе

71🕊19❤‍🔥5👍1🥴1

1 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,870 views80 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😳 Yeat отреагировал на удаление своего куплета из трека Young Thug и YSL «Eaters»: «🤣» По информации из сети, другой артист с трека поставил Таггеру ультиматум: удалить либо его куплет, либо куплет Yeat. В итоге куплет Yeat убрали, и теперь на треке официально указаны только Travis Scott и Future. По слухам, ультиматум поставил Travis Scott из-за того, что Yeat ранее записал совместный трек с Kylie Jenner. 🥤Quick

55😁23👎2

1 Sept 2026, 07:04 UTC≈2,800 views69 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🦅 Совместный альбом Ye и Ty Dolla $ign «VULTURES 3» всё-таки выйдет! Во время последней трансляции Ty Dolla $ign подтвердил это. Я вас понял насчёт VULTURES 3. Вы знаете, мы это сделаем. Ждёте? ❤️/👎 🥤QuickNRap

62👎7

31 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,670 views50 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

✈️ Ровно 8 лет назад Eminem без какого-либо анонса выпустил свой десятый студийный альбом «Kamikaze». Пластинка дебютировала на первом месте Billboard 200, разойдясь тиражом в 418 тысяч копий за первую неделю. В итоге «Kamikaze» стал самым продаваемым хип-хоп-альбомом 2018 года! Какие ваши любимые треки с него? 🥤QuickNRap

46👍4

31 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,540 views52 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

⚡️ Альбом Drake «ICEMAN» уже может получить ВТОРУЮ платиновую сертификацию в США Пластинка преодолела отметку в 2 миллиона проданных единиц менее чем за четыре месяца и стала самым продаваемым рэп-альбомом 2026 года. Лучший рэп-альбом в 2026 году? 🥤QuickNRap

38🔥8👎6

Showing the 12 most recent of 214 posts we hold for @quicknrapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@quicknrapp edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 169,889 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CODEINE CRAZY.
@CodeineCrazyTG · 62,763
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
AVENUE GANG
@avenuegang1 · 44,862
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
No Cap
@nocap · 55,498
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
цитаты рэперов
@citatarap · 48,048
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QuickNRap” (@quicknrapp), 22,117 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quicknrapp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.