Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал Счастья

Channel

Канал Счастья

@sitartur

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,164subscribers

-694 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193952427
TypeChannel
Usernames@silaartur @sitartur
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sitartur

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,16429,85829,5116 August 2026 — 29,858 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,858 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,831 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,808 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,807 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,796 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,792 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,772 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,765 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,730 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,719 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,718 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,701 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,689 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,671 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,657 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,642 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,611 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,592 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,585 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,583 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,579 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,569 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,557 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,546 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,536 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,528 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,526 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,511 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,501 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,469 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,463 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,455 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,446 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,442 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,422 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,407 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,404 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,401 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,397 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,388 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,352 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,345 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,339 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,333 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,328 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,321 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,312 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,298 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,289 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,283 subscribers4 September 2026 — 29,275 subscribers5 September 2026 — 29,262 subscribers6 September 2026 — 29,225 subscribers8 September 2026 — 29,195 subscribers9 September 2026 — 29,175 subscribers11 September 2026 — 29,164 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
58 measurements spanning 36 days, net -694. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,060–29,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 05:3829,164-11
9 Sept 2026, 21:3929,175-20
8 Sept 2026, 09:4129,195-30
6 Sept 2026, 13:3829,225-37
5 Sept 2026, 02:0129,262-13
4 Sept 2026, 07:2229,275-8
3 Sept 2026, 10:0729,283-6
2 Sept 2026, 20:2429,289-9
2 Sept 2026, 07:5629,298-14
1 Sept 2026, 15:4829,312-9
1 Sept 2026, 05:5429,321-7
31 Aug 2026, 12:1529,328-5
31 Aug 2026, 03:2429,333-6
30 Aug 2026, 11:4729,339-6
30 Aug 2026, 00:3529,345-7
29 Aug 2026, 14:0229,352-36
28 Aug 2026, 23:1729,388-9
28 Aug 2026, 12:1729,397-4
28 Aug 2026, 01:3629,401-3
27 Aug 2026, 09:3529,404first reading

Engagement

192 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.85%
avg views ÷ 29,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 192 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held192 (4 August 20266 September 2026)
Views total173,024
Reactions total44,002
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

55,378 reactions across 191 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24,94745.0%
❤‍🔥16,00128.9%
custom 54474008064226846838,57915.5%
🔥2,4324.39%
😁1,0801.95%
custom 53192340774574042611,0271.85%
custom 54494425136161218576911.25%
🤩2220.401%
👍1430.258%
🤯1150.208%
💔590.107%
😭590.107%
👏230.042%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 192 of the 192 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,765 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 192 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3,751
across the posts below
Posts paid on
191
of 192 we hold a reading for · 99%
Most on one post
323
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sitartur. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 192 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC758 views276 reactions5 Starsread 7 September 2026

Еще часто просят рассказать о том промежутке времени когда случилось пробуждение Каким тогда был Когда случилось просветление Но я не пишу об этом потому что не вижу для вас в этом пользы Это просто личное прошлое другого человека Оно не поможет вам ничем Личные истории могут доставить приятное ощущение, если тебе приятен человек проживший их, если он интересен тебе Но могут ли они принести пользу большую, чем сейчас

139❤‍🔥69custom 544740080642268468349🔥13custom 53192340774574042612custom 54494425136161218572🤩1😁1

6 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTC732 views287 reactions3 Starsread 7 September 2026

Ничего не ответил Пока рассказал вам Это же вас касается Что касается вас я пишу на каналах и говорю на видео А что вам бесполезно о том не говорю Не говорю с вами никогда о том, что вам ничего полезного не даст Поэтому мне кажется я всегда пишу, в каждом своем сообщении говорю только о самом важном и действительно абсолютно полезном

130❤‍🔥79custom 544740080642268468353🔥15custom 53192340774574042615👍1👏1🤩1

6 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC733 views271 reactions3 Starsread 7 September 2026

Мне сейчас дома предложили написать небольшую книгу брошюрку памятку из нескольких советов «Если бы ты завтра решил завершить все свои дела здесь, что бы ты последнее сказал людям перед этим - 10 самых важных моментов. И потом раскрыть их каждую в этой книге до невероятных глубин так как ты всегда это делаешь..» Это не первое такое предложение за прошедшие десять лет «Самое важное»))

128❤‍🔥70custom 544740080642268468345🔥17custom 54494425136161218575💔3👍2🤩1

6 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC734 views197 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026

О чем, о ком будем писать сегодня?

95❤‍🔥54custom 544740080642268468341custom 54494425136161218573👍1🔥1🤩1😁1

6 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC734 views196 reactions2 Starsread 7 September 2026

Будем писать книгу сегодня?

102❤‍🔥42custom 544740080642268468340🔥9👍1🤩1😁1

6 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC723 views197 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026

Что важно обсудить в книге Сила?

100❤‍🔥46custom 544740080642268468334🔥12custom 54494425136161218572👍1🤩1😁1

6 Sept 2026, 07:18 UTC854 views279 reactions6 Starsread 7 September 2026

Я Был в Силе Потом здесь в Счастье А Сейчас Радио Трансляция - лучший из всех возможных Методов сейчас в этом Мире

129❤‍🔥83custom 544740080642268468343🔥9custom 53192340774574042617custom 54494425136161218576🤩1😁1

6 Sept 2026, 07:14 UTC861 views293 reactions6 Starsread 7 September 2026

Используй этот метод, чтобы Быть

136❤‍🔥81custom 544740080642268468340🔥16custom 53192340774574042619custom 54494425136161218575💔2🤩2

6 Sept 2026, 07:14 UTC841 views291 reactions7 Starsread 7 September 2026

Я твой метод - если сейчас для тебя Я Есть

142❤‍🔥78custom 544740080642268468339🔥17custom 53192340774574042616custom 54494425136161218576🤩2😁1

6 Sept 2026, 07:13 UTC821 views279 reactions8 Starsread 7 September 2026

И если этот метод открывает Бытие - он Твой

137❤‍🔥78custom 544740080642268468341custom 54494425136161218579🔥7custom 53192340774574042615🤩1😁1

6 Sept 2026, 07:13 UTC778 views279 reactions7 Starsread 7 September 2026

Это лучший метод из всех что можно было бы придумать

142❤‍🔥77custom 544740080642268468334🔥11custom 54494425136161218576custom 53192340774574042615👍2👏1

6 Sept 2026, 07:12 UTC781 views269 reactions7 Starsread 7 September 2026

Потому что Быть - это само Бытие всё целиком одновременно И всё оно в тебе бесконечном

133❤‍🔥82custom 544740080642268468332🔥8custom 53192340774574042618custom 54494425136161218575🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 192 posts we hold for @sitartur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Сила Жизни
@ArturSitaLife · 3,752
#1
Pro всё полезное
@provsepoleznoe · 1,135
#2
Кристина Егиазарова Исходный Код
@kristina_egiazarovaaa1407 · 364,607
#3
Тот, кого нет 🪐
@totkogo_net · 13,420
#4
✨Екатерина Петерсил✨
@katepetersil · 7,093
#5
Anardreams Manifest
@anardreamsmanifest · 3,952
#6
Дима Спирит
@dmitry_spirit · 9,546
#7
Мария Дмитриева | Сокровенное знание❤️‍🔥
@marydme_spirit_wisdom · 1,371
#8
Ада Кондэ - личный канал - Ada Conde
@Adaconde1 · 125,604
#9
Александр Брат
@aleksandrbrat · 18,071
#10
Bhakti life с Натальей Савич
@Bhaktilife · 26,643
#11
Ekaterina Amani 🤍 просветление медитация самадхи
@ekaterinaamani · 1,771
#12
Архитектор Сознания | Константин Евдокимов
@evdokimov_arhitektor · 6,487
#13
Развитие с Игорем Будниковым: марафоны и обучающие курсы
@welcomebackhome · 28,160
#14
Иван Ананда
@now_awakening · 1,939
#15
Хочу Ясности
@dzenline · 3,403
#16
Канал ❤️‍🔥Инны Маруниной
@energy_marunina · 57,858
#17
ТЫ ЕСТЬ ВСЁ
@tietotmir333 · 3,942
#18
Петр Лупенко
@peka_pohudel · 90,627
#19
Елена Фесик l эволюция мышления
@Helena_fesik · 9,626
#20
Екатерина Никанорова ВИДЕО
@nikanorova_E · 1,473 (as read 8 September 2026)
#21
KONSTANTIN NOVOSELTSEV | Я ЕСТЬ
@Konstantin_Novoseltsev · 2,374
#22
Дмитрий Гухман | Сексология
@idemvmeste_dimagukhman · 69,824
#23
☀️Григорий Киреев | Путь к Себе
@omdobro · 6,327
#24
МАГИЯ БОГИНИ. ЖЕНСКИЕ ПРАКТИКИ
@my_mystery_room · 2,791 (as read 8 September 2026)
#25
Екатерина Прохорцева| психология роста сознания
@kate_proh · 37,441
#26
Артур Сила Цитаты #силадня
@artursila_citaty · 2,992
#27
Даниил Зуев | Искусство быть
@danzuev · 8,202
#28
Анар Дримс
@dreamslife · 18,372
#29
ОШО | Путь внутрь
@oshorussian · 23,194
#30
Анна✨Нутрициолог Medical Medium
@anechkavegan · 361
#31
СВЕТ ВЫСШЕЙ МИЛОСТИ
@Pranava_Ji · 10,217
#32
Наталья Кузьмич. Загоночки
@kuzmich_govorit · 5,543
#33
Денис Дзен
@dzendenis · 1,723
#34
Александр Палиенко
@alexanderpalienko · 68,888
#35
SASHA BELAIR
@ab_chat · 134,450
#36
©️Maks Kosmos
@kosmosmaks · 5,735
#37
Meta Spirituality Official
@metaspiritualityofficial · 12,359
#38
Дмитрий Троцкий и команда
@alhimik108 · 39,705
#39
Сергей Кулдин
@kuldinchannel · 18,815
#40
Mikhail Saidov
@MikhailSaidov · 54,638
#41
Алеся Байкалова 💎
@baikalowa · 4,405
#42
Дмитрий Лапшинов ЗОЖ
@dmitrii_lapshinov · 24,670
#43
Мона Соло | эстетика и стиль
@monasoloclub · 393
#44
Трансерфинг реальности
@transerfing_realnosti_tyt · 149,544
#45
ИМРАМ КРИЙЯ
@imram_kriya · 71,616
#46
Сергей Косенко
@Kosenkosergei · 58,628
#47
ЮЛИЯ ХАДАРЦЕВА 🕊️ | Расстановки
@JuliaKhadartseva · 38,228
#48
Lee — Вибрации
@lee_vibrations · 29,775
#49
LIZALAMA
@liza_mir6 · 759
#50
Дмитрий Шаменков
@shamenkov · 13,092
#51
Карина Исхакова
@karinapronastavnichestvo · 19,633
#52
Саи Прана Шакти Ма
@sai_prana · 776
#53
🔅MARIA LAV
@marialav_com · 887
#54
Лиана KaifTherapy
@kaiftherapy · 11,934
#55
Утренняя медитация 🧘‍♂️
@utro_meditation · 512 (as read 8 September 2026)
#56
ПОРА ПРОСНУТЬСЯ | Прогрессивная макро психология
@vselenamaster_ps · 75,042
#57
Роман Давыдов
@davydovuniverse · 2,447
#58
ДРЕВС
@drevs108 · 75,927
#59
ZAMORINA DARIA🙏🏼💙
@zamorinadaria · 1,913
#60
Светлана Драган
@svetlanadragan · 115,235
#61
Ключи Мастерства
@kluchimasterstva · 30,868
#62
Роландс Лагоцкис | Дом Со-Вершение
@so_vershenie · 475
#63
Сергей Теплых⚜️SYUCAI Training Institute UAE
@syucai_sergei_teplykh · 5,958
#64
KOH SAMUI EVENTS
@Buffalo_Event_Hall · 366
#65
РЕЛЬСЫ 5.0 - 11 января
@vlad_iss_reels · 3,441
#66
Роман Карловский | Энергодыхание
@Energybreathing · 13,328
#67
Наталия Андермур | BEYONDS
@beyonds_project · 1,100
#68
Осознанный Юмор 😜
@MindfulnessHumor · 510
#69
BJ Taro
@bjtaro · 18,190
#70
АЭСТЕТИКА
@antonantonov711 · 14,341
#71
Просветление реально для ТЕБЯ
@prosvetlenierealno · 572
#72
НЕЙРОДИНАМИКА С РОМАНОМ АРТЕМЬЕВЫМ
@neirodinamikaAR · 265
#73
ВсеЛенская Терапия Леонида Тальписа
@vselenskayaterapiya · 62,138
#74
ИВАН ПЕТРОВ | мотиватор по трансформации сознания
@ivanpetrovpsihologtvp · 548
#75
Дассий | Просветление | Осознанность | Пробуждение
@prosvetlenie_osoznannost · 1,897
#76
Юлия Ивлиева
@amelisoul_master · 104,912
#77
99,9% честности
@vctr_de · 365
#78
ANNA GOLITSYNA
@gods_lover_woman · 7,058
#79
🟪 АУДИОКНИГИ ПО ЭЗОТЕРИКЕ
@ezolibry · 16,342
#80
САМУИ БЛОГ
@samuiblog_feed · 19,056
#81
Ирина Безрукова • Актриса театра и кино
@bezrukova_telegram · 7,828
#82
Галина Приходько ⚜️СЮЦАЙ, консалтинг личностного роста и бизнеса
@galinaprikhodkosyucai · 3,515
#83
Муджи
@moojine2 · 583 (as read 8 September 2026)
#84
ОЛЬГА БАЛАРАМА | Личный дневник
@olga_balarama · 13,851
#85

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дмитрий Троцкий и команда
@alhimik108 · 39,705
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал Счастья” (@sitartur), 29,164 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sitartur.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.